don't watch if you're a pussy
Last edited by Eye-GiZzLe (2008-05-25 11:30:55)
mhh, looks jummy
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
wat
badass rape
I can see this going wrong in so many ways.... oh and THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN!!!
In all honesty, being a member/donator of the ASPCA, I'd much rather see people hunt like this, as gory as it is. It's not like shooting or using bow and arrows where if you hit the animal anywhere but the head or heart, the animal dies a slow, painful death. Here, the animal simply doesn't feel anything and dies instantaneously.
watPoseidon wrote:
It's not like shooting or using bow and arrows where if you hit the animal anywhere but the head or heart, the animal dies a slow, painful death.
It's exactly the same. Infact it's worse, I'd imagine you'd cause alot of pain and suffering if you hit the bird anywhere but the neck for a decapitation.
I don't care what you'll say -
I don't see a reason for filiming the killing of animals and putting it on youtube, sickos
I don't see a reason for filiming the killing of animals and putting it on youtube, sickos
Lazy hunting redneck bums
Nuff said'
Nuff said'
how do you think humans have survived without hunting?Magpie wrote:
Lazy hunting redneck bums
Nuff said'
Epic ownage is epic.
But seriously...
But seriously...
I never said that, I said "lazy redneck hunting bums"Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
how do you think humans have survived without hunting?Magpie wrote:
Lazy hunting redneck bums
Nuff said'
how you can get that to "how do you think humans have survived without hunting" is beyond me
hmm maybe because you seem to be against hunting...Magpie wrote:
I never said that, I said "lazy redneck hunting bums"Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
how do you think humans have survived without hunting?Magpie wrote:
Lazy hunting redneck bums
Nuff said'
how you can get that to "how do you think humans have survived without hunting" is beyond me
Wos it really necessary to decapitate the turkey that wos humping his missus?
Not at all, but if you miss with that "arrow" and hit the turkey anywhere else you can be sure that you wont kill the animal just hurt it badly. If you hunt you have to make sure that the animal you put down goes down quickly , and then that you acctualy eat up what you hunt.Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
hmm maybe because you seem to be against hunting...Magpie wrote:
I never said that, I said "lazy redneck hunting bums"Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
how do you think humans have survived without hunting?
how you can get that to "how do you think humans have survived without hunting" is beyond me
Quick decapitation is the least painful way to die, besides being shot in the neck.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
watPoseidon wrote:
It's not like shooting or using bow and arrows where if you hit the animal anywhere but the head or heart, the animal dies a slow, painful death.
It's exactly the same. Infact it's worse, I'd imagine you'd cause alot of pain and suffering if you hit the bird anywhere but the neck for a decapitation.
...considering it snaps the bird's neck right off. The reason it's still moving is because nerve signals are still being sent down the spinal cord.
So...expect to see more turkey heads laying around on the forest floor? Or on people's walls.
hmm, i'll stick to a shotgun blast to the head
can you imagine one of those hitting a bird in the body? that wouldnt be quick... That would be incredibly messy and painfull.Poseidon wrote:
Quick decapitation is the least painful way to die, besides being shot in the neck.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
watPoseidon wrote:
It's not like shooting or using bow and arrows where if you hit the animal anywhere but the head or heart, the animal dies a slow, painful death.
It's exactly the same. Infact it's worse, I'd imagine you'd cause alot of pain and suffering if you hit the bird anywhere but the neck for a decapitation.
...considering it snaps the bird's neck right off. The reason it's still moving is because nerve signals are still being sent down the spinal cord.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
I'm not talking about that.Poseidon wrote:
Quick decapitation is the least painful way to die, besides being shot in the neck.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
watPoseidon wrote:
It's not like shooting or using bow and arrows where if you hit the animal anywhere but the head or heart, the animal dies a slow, painful death.
It's exactly the same. Infact it's worse, I'd imagine you'd cause alot of pain and suffering if you hit the bird anywhere but the neck for a decapitation.
...considering it snaps the bird's neck right off. The reason it's still moving is because nerve signals are still being sent down the spinal cord.
You're saying this is more humane than using arrows and shit. But, it's the same thing. Both require you to shoot a specific part of the body for a humane kill. Both inflict unnecessary suffering if you miss said vital area. It's literally no different than using arrows and aiming for the head and destroying the brain.
I don't know it depends, if the velocity of the arrow is the same as with a regular arrow it would be more painful but alot quicker. OF course if it was a lower volocity then it wouldn't penetrate as far and as you said it may well be slower and more painful, though it may open enough blood vessels to kill it quickly anyway.presidentsheep wrote:
can you imagine one of those hitting a bird in the body? that wouldnt be quick... That would be incredibly messy and painfull.Poseidon wrote:
Quick decapitation is the least painful way to die, besides being shot in the neck.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
wat
It's exactly the same. Infact it's worse, I'd imagine you'd cause alot of pain and suffering if you hit the bird anywhere but the neck for a decapitation.
...considering it snaps the bird's neck right off. The reason it's still moving is because nerve signals are still being sent down the spinal cord.
it might still be an arrow but the area to aim for is much bigger since you have the decapitation blades extruding like 3 inches to the side of the arrow. this means that it might be messy if you hit it in the body, but the chance of hitting in the wrong spot is incredibly small unless the animal is moving or you are a complete idiot and use the arrow in a wrong way (different munitions for different hunting scenarios, it's exactly the same with buckshot and slugs for shotgun, they are used for different scenarious.)Mek-Stizzle wrote:
You're saying this is more humane than using arrows and shit. But, it's the same thing. Both require you to shoot a specific part of the body for a humane kill. Both inflict unnecessary suffering if you miss said vital area. It's literally no different than using arrows and aiming for the head and destroying the brain.
As far as i see it its all death no matter how horrific or inhumane it is. Death is a part of life.
My god, we already have a hippy-infested topic here, why not go there? Stop making these topics, im starting to hear bob marley and i'm smelling some nasty shit...and weed.
NeXuS4909 wrote:
As far as i see it its all death no matter how horrific or inhumane it is. Death is a part of life.
Got any thing for hunting roast potatoes? Or better still a "Chicken Tikka Masalla, Pilau Rice and Plain Naan" ?