That was mature, but Im guessing your saying fuck the government, not the people? Least thats what I hope.Pubic wrote:
Fuck Iran, fuck the USA, GWB and I'm-mad-in-a-jar should just drink 20 shots and settle it, Pussies.
I don't think it proves anything at all.Turquoise wrote:
This does not justify war. This just proves that our complaints of Iran aiding terrorists are hypocritical.rammunition wrote:
Along With Israel
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080523/wl … 0523174601
If someone with Iranian links bombed a church in America, i would bet the U.S would do some strikes on Iran, so why should Iran not now nuke the virus, that is America,???
"Those responsible for the attack against the Shiraz mosque have confessed to having links to worldwide oppression, in particular the United States and Israel," Ghorbanali Dorri-Najafabadi was quoted by the agency as saying.
^^^ That is the charge. Pretty damn vague and completely without any evidence. We are supposed to just believe him ?
Oh and LOL at rammunition, you are like the National Enquirer of thread starters
Well, Vax, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical. However, we do have a history of supporting insurgency in Iran. Remember the Iran-contra scandal?
That was more about an arms for hostages scheme, wasn't it ?Turquoise wrote:
Well, Vax, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical. However, we do have a history of supporting insurgency in Iran. Remember the Iran-contra scandal?
But yes I suppose we have supported opposition to the mullahs, I just doubt it extends to training terrorists to bomb mosques...
People hate people from other places. It's human nature.Bell wrote:
Indeed, I think hes playing on how, in the rest of the world, it is almost fashionable to hate America. Atleast from my experience it is. Go anywhere in europe and say ''and those dam Americans'' and someone is bound to agree with you.NantanCochise wrote:
This thread is FAIL big time.
There just ignorant, I wouldnt worry about it
Martyn
You walk in America and say "Fuckin' Europeans", "Fucking Muslims" , "Fucking non-Americans" and people are going to agree.
the U.S doesn't train others to bomb mosques, they do it themselvesVax wrote:
That was more about an arms for hostages scheme, wasn't it ?Turquoise wrote:
Well, Vax, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical. However, we do have a history of supporting insurgency in Iran. Remember the Iran-contra scandal?
But yes I suppose we have supported opposition to the mullahs, I just doubt it extends to training terrorists to bomb mosques...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0407-06.htm
You can arm camels with nukes?
Wow. That was totally objective.rammunition wrote:
the U.S doesn't train others to bomb mosques, they do it themselvesVax wrote:
That was more about an arms for hostages scheme, wasn't it ?Turquoise wrote:
Well, Vax, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical. However, we do have a history of supporting insurgency in Iran. Remember the Iran-contra scandal?
But yes I suppose we have supported opposition to the mullahs, I just doubt it extends to training terrorists to bomb mosques...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0407-06.htm
/sarcasm
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
True... I guess what I should have said is that we have a history of supporting insurgency in Iran (like how we undermined Mossadegh) and that most of our interest in supporting insurgencies involves Latin America (Cuba in particular).Vax wrote:
That was more about an arms for hostages scheme, wasn't it ?Turquoise wrote:
Well, Vax, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical. However, we do have a history of supporting insurgency in Iran. Remember the Iran-contra scandal?
But yes I suppose we have supported opposition to the mullahs, I just doubt it extends to training terrorists to bomb mosques...
Perhaps, but every single thread rammuniton takes part in is vitrol-filled and "anti-american."jord wrote:
People hate people from other places. It's human nature.Bell wrote:
Indeed, I think hes playing on how, in the rest of the world, it is almost fashionable to hate America. Atleast from my experience it is. Go anywhere in europe and say ''and those dam Americans'' and someone is bound to agree with you.NantanCochise wrote:
This thread is FAIL big time.
There just ignorant, I wouldnt worry about it
Martyn
You walk in America and say "Fuckin' Europeans", "Fucking Muslims" , "Fucking non-Americans" and people are going to agree.
Nobody should nuke anyone. What the fuck is your problem?
he's an idiot. that's what.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody should nuke anyone. What the fuck is your problem?
Last edited by RoosterCantrell (2008-05-24 16:18:25)
dorkstar...ask your mom... how would i know...d4rkst4r wrote:
Haha good luck with that. So tell me Catbox, is George Bush's cock 2 or 3 inches long??[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I thought the op was the handicapable poster of the day... we may have a tie... back under your rock...d4rkst4r wrote:
good, maybe then it will teach and America a fucking lesson.
Iran doesn't have a nuke and we should make sure they never do...
Love is the answer
i would ask why the US is the only one taking the threat of islamifcation seriously.
people complain all day long about the US being an imperialist menace.
well, let me tell you, islam is THE imperialist problem we should all be united in defeating. Darfur anyone? IJ in Phillipines? etc etc
islam should be erased.
people complain all day long about the US being an imperialist menace.
well, let me tell you, islam is THE imperialist problem we should all be united in defeating. Darfur anyone? IJ in Phillipines? etc etc
islam should be erased.
Radical Islam, not fair to destroy one belief by generalizing the whole thing is a meance.CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
i would ask why the US is the only one taking the threat of islamifcation seriously.
people complain all day long about the US being an imperialist menace.
well, let me tell you, islam is THE imperialist problem we should all be united in defeating. Darfur anyone? IJ in Phillipines? etc etc
islam should be erased.
Last edited by r2zoo (2008-05-24 20:24:20)
I reckon at 22 years old I have about 60-odd years left. I know I will witness nuclear war before I die, fuck it'll probably kill me.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody should nuke anyone. What the fuck is your problem?
Were all doomed.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
That was in IRAQ, and during combat, if they shoot from the mosque, can they expect the mosque to be off limits ?rammunition wrote:
the U.S doesn't train others to bomb mosques, they do it themselvesVax wrote:
That was more about an arms for hostages scheme, wasn't it ?Turquoise wrote:
Well, Vax, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical. However, we do have a history of supporting insurgency in Iran. Remember the Iran-contra scandal?
But yes I suppose we have supported opposition to the mullahs, I just doubt it extends to training terrorists to bomb mosques...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0407-06.htm
Anyway, we were talking about IRAN
(I know they are easily confused sometimes)
What benefit do the US or the Israelis get from blowing up people at a sermon in an Iranian mosque...? Oh and btw, the british are accused also..
I just doubt the cia or the mossad are fuckin around with this
I was reading a little more about the Shiraz bombing
Bombs are rarity in Iran. No one has yet taken responsibility for the blast. Hojatoleslam Anjavinejad is a cleric popular with young religious crowds and his sermons typically contain attacks on Wahabis, the fundamentalist Sunni sect with largest following in Saudi Arabia.
At the time of the blast, Anjavinejad was addressing the youths affiliated with Rahpouyan Vesal-e Shiraz organization. An eyewitness report put the number of people in attendance at around 800.
interesting.
Then, there's this from CNN ???/
Last edited by Vax (2008-05-24 22:07:17)
No idea if it was mentioned before, but:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/ … explosion/
Iran says that Britain was involved too. So, rammunition, should Iran nuke the UK?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/ … explosion/
Iran says that Britain was involved too. So, rammunition, should Iran nuke the UK?
Given the Wahhabi connection... I'd say Saudi Arabia is the REAL culprit. This isn't something the Saudi government would necessarily be behind, but it is something Wahhabi groups would be more than comfortable with.Vax wrote:
That was in IRAQ, and during combat, if they shoot from the mosque, can they expect the mosque to be off limits ?rammunition wrote:
the U.S doesn't train others to bomb mosques, they do it themselvesVax wrote:
That was more about an arms for hostages scheme, wasn't it ?
But yes I suppose we have supported opposition to the mullahs, I just doubt it extends to training terrorists to bomb mosques...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0407-06.htm
Anyway, we were talking about IRAN
(I know they are easily confused sometimes)
What benefit do the US or the Israelis get from blowing up people at a sermon in an Iranian mosque...? Oh and btw, the british are accused also..
I just doubt the cia or the mossad are fuckin around with this
I was reading a little more about the Shiraz bombing
Bombs are rarity in Iran. No one has yet taken responsibility for the blast. Hojatoleslam Anjavinejad is a cleric popular with young religious crowds and his sermons typically contain attacks on Wahabis, the fundamentalist Sunni sect with largest following in Saudi Arabia.
At the time of the blast, Anjavinejad was addressing the youths affiliated with Rahpouyan Vesal-e Shiraz organization. An eyewitness report put the number of people in attendance at around 800.
interesting.
I think I'll witness a Nuclear attack but not a war. Just one side using Nuclear weapons.KILLSWITCH wrote:
I reckon at 22 years old I have about 60-odd years left. I know I will witness nuclear war before I die, fuck it'll probably kill me.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody should nuke anyone. What the fuck is your problem?
Were all doomed.
Something better happen, for all I know I'm half way through life.
your creativity is outstanding. And how would you know? because your one of the 12 people in this world that think george bush is the greatest president ever, defending his police state agenda.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
dorkstar...ask your mom... how would i know...d4rkst4r wrote:
Haha good luck with that. So tell me Catbox, is George Bush's cock 2 or 3 inches long??[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I thought the op was the handicapable poster of the day... we may have a tie... back under your rock...
Iran doesn't have a nuke and we should make sure they never do...
"you know life is what we make it, and a chance is like a picture, it'd be nice if you just take it"
Stop swinging from Alex Jones' nuts ...
Save your energy. Some people can't grasp the idea of intent.Vax wrote:
That was in IRAQ, and during combat, if they shoot from the mosque, can they expect the mosque to be off limits ?rammunition wrote:
the U.S doesn't train others to bomb mosques, they do it themselvesVax wrote:
That was more about an arms for hostages scheme, wasn't it ?
But yes I suppose we have supported opposition to the mullahs, I just doubt it extends to training terrorists to bomb mosques...
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0407-06.htm
Anyway, we were talking about IRAN
(I know they are easily confused sometimes)
What benefit do the US or the Israelis get from blowing up people at a sermon in an Iranian mosque...? Oh and btw, the british are accused also..
I just doubt the cia or the mossad are fuckin around with this
I was reading a little more about the Shiraz bombing
Bombs are rarity in Iran. No one has yet taken responsibility for the blast. Hojatoleslam Anjavinejad is a cleric popular with young religious crowds and his sermons typically contain attacks on Wahabis, the fundamentalist Sunni sect with largest following in Saudi Arabia.
At the time of the blast, Anjavinejad was addressing the youths affiliated with Rahpouyan Vesal-e Shiraz organization. An eyewitness report put the number of people in attendance at around 800.
interesting.
Then, there's this from CNN ???/
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I hold Irans claims that the US/UK are supporting terrorists in Iran with the same skepticism as as the US claims that Iran is supporting militias in Iraq. Prove it or shut up.
Personally I expect that both will turn out to be slightly true. Iran has no fondness of the US and has a chance to dig the knife in a bit, but ultimately has little to gain and a lot to loose from it. Same goes for the US/UK. We have a history of supporting and engaging in terrorism, I've seen little to indicate that that's suddenly changed.
Also supporting terrorism isn't a crime that should be responded to with nukes, that's just stupid. If anyone has actual evidence that another country is supporting tarrorist organisations that attack them, take the evidence to the world court and prove it, then let them decide the punishment.
Personally I expect that both will turn out to be slightly true. Iran has no fondness of the US and has a chance to dig the knife in a bit, but ultimately has little to gain and a lot to loose from it. Same goes for the US/UK. We have a history of supporting and engaging in terrorism, I've seen little to indicate that that's suddenly changed.
Also supporting terrorism isn't a crime that should be responded to with nukes, that's just stupid. If anyone has actual evidence that another country is supporting tarrorist organisations that attack them, take the evidence to the world court and prove it, then let them decide the punishment.
What if I admit to ties to the Easter Bunny under Iranian interrogation?