Lai
Member
+186|6628
First of all let me say that I think that if we have a [youtube][/youtube] option, we should have a [liveleak][/liveleak] option as well, especially on a 'Battlefield' related forum.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=310_1212367354&p=1

That said, I'd say the guys above are totally nuts, but it does prove a point. It's interesting to see in any case.
belldawg
Serial Jay-Walker
+52|6460|Perth, indian ocean
wow. It didn't even hurt them. Must've been good armour

they're still crazy fucks though
OrangeHound
Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...
+1,335|7126|Washington DC

Lai wrote:

First of all let me say that I think that if we have a [youtube][/youtube] option, we should have a [liveleak][/liveleak] option as well, especially on a 'Battlefield' related forum.
Nothing will be added on this forum I would guess, but trackr supports multiple video formats.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|7015|Long Island, New York
Impressive...I'd never do that no matter how much protection I had on, though. That guy's nuts.

I think I've seen something like this on the Military Channel.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6924|Chicago, IL
nice

just curious, buy why don't our soldiers get better body armor?  Is it not worth the cost to save a life?  and considering the medical costs, it would likely be cheaper in the long run...
13rin
Member
+977|6956
Mini moronothon.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|7158|Disaster Free Zone

S.Lythberg wrote:

nice

just curious, buy why don't our soldiers get better body armor?  Is it not worth the cost to save a life?  and considering the medical costs, it would likely be cheaper in the long run...
The wrong company makes it.
Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7199|Eastern PA

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Mini moronothon.
The guy in the blue t-shirt had some shorts on.

80s-tastic!
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|7045|Mountains of NC

operator - " Hello General Insurance "

man - " Yes I would like to apply for life insurance "

operator - " Excellent, I just need you to answer some questions, Hows your health ? "

man - " In good shape, I don't smoke or drink and exercise once a day "

operator - " Sounds good, Whats your line of work "

man - " I test body armour on live fire ranges "

operator - * click *

man - " Hello, Hello "
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
imortal
Member
+240|7142|Austin, TX

S.Lythberg wrote:

nice

just curious, buy why don't our soldiers get better body armor?  Is it not worth the cost to save a life?  and considering the medical costs, it would likely be cheaper in the long run...
There are several factors that play into the armor game. 

-The better the armor protection is, in general terms, the heavier and bulkier it is.
-The more areas you cover with armor, the more weight you are carrying, and the less maneuverable you are.
-The heavier your armor is, the less carrying capacity you have for other things, like weapon, ammuniton, radios...
-The less maneuverable you are, the less effective you in a combat situation (ducking for cover, running, turning, moving inside buildings).

It is a balance.  Armor is just one of the things a soldier needs.
Lai
Member
+186|6628

S.Lythberg wrote:

nice

just curious, buy why don't our soldiers get better body armor?  Is it not worth the cost to save a life?  and considering the medical costs, it would likely be cheaper in the long run...
Define 'better body armour' please,.. I mean yes a 3 inch titanium sheet would probably stop more than anything around, but it would be quite cumbersome.

To my knowledge the Interceptor body armour is pretty decent and as a guy I think the groin protection is a big plus. DragonSkin is claimed to be superior, but I'm rather sceptical about the design and I've never seen a full protection version of it. Which is probably due to not being able to form the curves necessary for it to fit one's neck and limbs. I do believe there was a alternative to kevlar/twaron called zelon/xelon or something but, allthough it outpreformed the standard aramids in weight/protection, the fibers deteriorated too fast.

What I'm very curious about is how the armour of the French FELIN systems preform; they seem to have very good neck and shoulder protection and are said to be very flexible.

Edit:
imortal wrote:S.Lythberg wrote:nice

just curious, buy why don't our soldiers get better body armor?  Is it not worth the cost to save a life?  and considering the medical costs, it would likely be cheaper in the long run...There are several factors that play into the armor game. 

-The better the armor protection is, in general terms, the heavier and bulkier it is.
-The more areas you cover with armor, the more weight you are carrying, and the less maneuverable you are.
-The heavier your armor is, the less carrying capacity you have for other things, like weapon, ammuniton, radios...
-The less maneuverable you are, the less effective you in a combat situation (ducking for cover, running, turning, moving inside buildings).

It is a balance.  Armor is just one of the things a soldier needs.Something that seems to be forgotten quite often: with most of the conflicts in which western nations are currently involved taking place in arid to extremely arid region, heat and heat dispersion seems to me like a very important issue. The more armour you wear, the warmer it is and the worse the heat dispersion is.

Last edited by Lai (2008-06-05 12:02:05)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard