Drykill
I Like Waffles.
+47|6962|England
Will a 750W PSU cost more to run than a 600W if the demands from both PSUs are the same? So 450W being used on both would the electricity bill be more on the 750W?
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone
Make sure the PSU is 80+. Your PC will only take as much power as it needs, so it doesn't matter if its 1000W or 500W.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Brasso
member
+1,549|6900

As .Sup alludes to, it depends on the efficiency.  80+ = 80%+ efficiency.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Kurazoo
Pheasant Plucker
+440|6954|West Yorkshire, U.K

.Sup wrote:

Make sure the PSU is 80+. Your PC will only take as much power as it needs, so it doesn't matter if its 1000W or 500W.

haffeysucks wrote:

As .Sup alludes to, it depends on the efficiency.  80+ = 80%+ efficiency.
What do you guys mean by 80+, may I ask?
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6467|Winland

Kurazoo wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Make sure the PSU is 80+. Your PC will only take as much power as it needs, so it doesn't matter if its 1000W or 500W.

haffeysucks wrote:

As .Sup alludes to, it depends on the efficiency.  80+ = 80%+ efficiency.
What do you guys mean by 80+, may I ask?
It's a certification. It means that over 80% of the power that goes in comes out, and doesn't convert to noise or heat. If there was a PSU that was 100% effective, it wouldn't need any cooling, as it wouldn't genereate any heat. But that's quite impossible.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Brasso
member
+1,549|6900

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Kurazoo wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Make sure the PSU is 80+. Your PC will only take as much power as it needs, so it doesn't matter if its 1000W or 500W.

haffeysucks wrote:

As .Sup alludes to, it depends on the efficiency.  80+ = 80%+ efficiency.
What do you guys mean by 80+, may I ask?
It's a certification. It means that over 80% of the power that goes in comes out, and doesn't convert to noise or heat. If there was a PSU that was 100% effective, it wouldn't need any cooling, as it wouldn't genereate any heat. But that's quite impossible.
Yep.  It's like perpetual power - everyone wants it, but we're 99.9999% sure it's not physically possible.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6467|Winland

haffeysucks wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Kurazoo wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Make sure the PSU is 80+. Your PC will only take as much power as it needs, so it doesn't matter if its 1000W or 500W.
What do you guys mean by 80+, may I ask?
It's a certification. It means that over 80% of the power that goes in comes out, and doesn't convert to noise or heat. If there was a PSU that was 100% effective, it wouldn't need any cooling, as it wouldn't genereate any heat. But that's quite impossible.
Yep.  It's like perpetual power - everyone wants it, but we're 99.9999% sure it's not physically possible.
Wonder if it'll start popping up 90+ supplies some day...
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


It's a certification. It means that over 80% of the power that goes in comes out, and doesn't convert to noise or heat. If there was a PSU that was 100% effective, it wouldn't need any cooling, as it wouldn't genereate any heat. But that's quite impossible.
Yep.  It's like perpetual power - everyone wants it, but we're 99.9999% sure it's not physically possible.
Wonder if it'll start popping up 90+ supplies some day...
Its possible but their cooling bodies will need to get a lot bigger.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6467|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:


Yep.  It's like perpetual power - everyone wants it, but we're 99.9999% sure it's not physically possible.
Wonder if it'll start popping up 90+ supplies some day...
Its possible but their cooling bodies will need to get a lot bigger.
Why on earth would they need to get that? The more efficient a PSU is, the less heat it produces.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


Wonder if it'll start popping up 90+ supplies some day...
Its possible but their cooling bodies will need to get a lot bigger.
Why on earth would they need to get that? The more efficient a PSU is, the less heat it produces.
But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Brasso
member
+1,549|6900

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:


Its possible but their cooling bodies will need to get a lot bigger.
Why on earth would they need to get that? The more efficient a PSU is, the less heat it produces.
But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
No, I think Freezer is right.  The conversion is from 120V in the wall socket to the 12V rail for your GPU, 5V, etc.  Electricity to electricity.  But PSU's today aren't as efficient because although they convert electricity to electricity, they also convert some of that first electricity into heat, thus needing fans.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone

haffeysucks wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


Why on earth would they need to get that? The more efficient a PSU is, the less heat it produces.
But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
No, I think Freezer is right.  The conversion is from 120V in the wall socket to the 12V rail for your GPU, 5V, etc.  Electricity to electricity.  But PSU's today aren't as efficient because although they convert electricity to electricity, they also convert some of that first electricity into heat, thus needing fans.
Are you saying electricity doesn't pass through the CPU and that the electricity is not one of the factors why CPU's produce heat?
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6467|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Its possible but their cooling bodies will need to get a lot bigger.
Why on earth would they need to get that? The more efficient a PSU is, the less heat it produces.
But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
If it's more efficient, it doesn't produce that heat. Today's 75+/80+ PSUs don't produce much heat at all, enough to be cooled by 15-20CFM passing over some aluminum heatsinks. If there is a 90+ 500w PSU, it could probably even run passively.

.Sup wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

.Sup wrote:

But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
No, I think Freezer is right.  The conversion is from 120V in the wall socket to the 12V rail for your GPU, 5V, etc.  Electricity to electricity.  But PSU's today aren't as efficient because although they convert electricity to electricity, they also convert some of that first electricity into heat, thus needing fans.
Are you saying electricity doesn't pass through the CPU and that the electricity is not one of the factors why CPU's produce heat?
You can't compare a PSU and a CPU in that manner. A PSU just makes electricity to electricity, a CPU does calculations. A PSU converts A to B, the CPU uses B to do calculations. Basically, a CPU converts electricity to computer power. A PSU converts electricity to electricity.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-06-12 12:28:29)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Brasso
member
+1,549|6900

.Sup wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

.Sup wrote:


But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
No, I think Freezer is right.  The conversion is from 120V in the wall socket to the 12V rail for your GPU, 5V, etc.  Electricity to electricity.  But PSU's today aren't as efficient because although they convert electricity to electricity, they also convert some of that first electricity into heat, thus needing fans.
Are you saying electricity doesn't pass through the CPU and that the electricity is not one of the factors why CPU's produce heat?
No, in that aspect, you're right.  That's an example of electricity energy converting into heat energy.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Its possible but their cooling bodies will need to get a lot bigger.
Why on earth would they need to get that? The more efficient a PSU is, the less heat it produces.
But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
If it's more efficient, it doesn't produce that heat. Today's 75+/80+ PSUs don't produce much heat at all, enough to be cooled by 15-20CFM passing over some aluminum heatsinks. If there is a 90+ 500w PSU, it could probably even run passively.

.Sup wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:


No, I think Freezer is right.  The conversion is from 120V in the wall socket to the 12V rail for your GPU, 5V, etc.  Electricity to electricity.  But PSU's today aren't as efficient because although they convert electricity to electricity, they also convert some of that first electricity into heat, thus needing fans.
Are you saying electricity doesn't pass through the CPU and that the electricity is not one of the factors why CPU's produce heat?
You can't compare a PSU and a CPU in that manner. A PSU just makes electricity to electricity, a CPU does calculations.
I have never seen a 500W 80+ passively cooled PSU. And you are saying you can effectively cool off a 500W 90+ PSU if it would exist?
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6467|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Its possible but their cooling bodies will need to get a lot bigger.
Why on earth would they need to get that? The more efficient a PSU is, the less heat it produces.
But it can't be more efficient if you don't loose the heat doh. Its the same with CPUs, lower temps-higher clock.
If it's more efficient, it doesn't produce that heat. Today's 75+/80+ PSUs don't produce much heat at all, enough to be cooled by 15-20CFM passing over some aluminum heatsinks. If there is a 90+ 500w PSU, it could probably even run passively.

.Sup wrote:


Are you saying electricity doesn't pass through the CPU and that the electricity is not one of the factors why CPU's produce heat?
You can't compare a PSU and a CPU in that manner. A PSU just makes electricity to electricity, a CPU does calculations.
I have never seen a 500W 80+ passively cooled PSU. And you are saying you can effectively cool off a 500W 90+ PSU if it would exist?
Well, considering that a 90+ 500w PSU would produce less than half as much heat as an 80+ 500w PSU, yes.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6759|Gogledd Cymru

Sup you tard.

The more efficient something is, in this case PSU's, then the less heat they will produce.
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone
Tell me why aren't there any 500W 80+ passive PSU if they aren't getting that hot? At least i haven't seen any.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6759|Gogledd Cymru

.Sup wrote:

Tell me why aren't there any 500W 80+ passive PSU if they aren't getting that hot? At least i haven't seen any.
Because they are only 80% efficient, and thus create more waste energy (Sound + Heat).
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6467|Winland

The Sheriff wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Tell me why aren't there any 500W 80+ passive PSU if they aren't getting that hot? At least i haven't seen any.
Because they are only 80% efficient, and thus create more waste energy (Sound + Heat).
Exactly. Are you even listening to what we're all saying?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
The_Sniper_NM
Official EVGA Fanboy
+94|6383|SC | USA |
We need to get back on topic...

Drykill, a power supply only uses as much power as is required. It should cost the same between the 750w and 600w.

That is if both Units have the same specs, (except wattage) and have the same load on them.

Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2008-06-12 12:38:33)

Drykill
I Like Waffles.
+47|6962|England

The_Sniper_NM wrote:

We need to get back on topic...

Drykill, a power supply only uses as much power as is required. It should cost the same between the 750w and 600w.

That is if both Units have the same specs, (except wattage) and have the same load on them.
Thank you.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard