Good defrag sofware.

2008-06-16 08:02:17

#1

sportsman11-2cool4u: We can be those mistakes!; +98|6597|USA Biznatch!

Well I need help with a good defrag software. I searched and the ones that stuck out was diskeeper but you have to buy it XD. So, what's a current one that's good. Thanks.

Ok just to keep it all in one topic what's a good firewall? I had zonealarm but, it limited all my download speeds even with changes I made. Thanks.

Last edited by sportsman11-2cool4u (2008-06-16 10:05:37)

2008-06-16 08:03:27

#2

Mitch92uK: aka [DBS]Mitch92uK; +192|6505|United Kingdom

sportsman11-2cool4u wrote:
Well I need help with a good defrag software. I searched and the ones that stuck out was diskeeper but you have to buy it XD. So, what's a current one that's good. Thanks.

A current free one which is good or what?

2008-06-16 08:03:47

#3

Buckles: Cheeky Keen; +329|6826|Kent, UK

Defraggler is good, or if you want something a bit more fancy, O&O Defrag works wonders.

2008-06-16 08:06:39

#4

sportsman11-2cool4u: We can be those mistakes!; +98|6597|USA Biznatch!

Haha sorry more clear; A more popular one, that is free, and does it's job. I only know O&O something, diskeeper. Thanks buckles.

2008-06-16 08:20:33

#5

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6919

Just trying out Defraggler now, seems pretty good. I ran the Windows one the other day, which I thought was good enough, but it still seems to be finding stuff to do.

2008-06-16 08:34:27

#6

Mitch92uK: aka [DBS]Mitch92uK; +192|6505|United Kingdom

I tend to use the windows one just because i thought it did the job .. might have to try defraggler too now

2008-06-16 08:51:53

#7

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6467|Winland

Mitch92uK wrote:
I tend to use the windows one just because i thought it did the job .. might have to try defraggler too now

Windows defragger is very ineffective.

Also, Diskeeper is free. Everything is free.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-06-16 09:10:05

#8

sportsman11-2cool4u: We can be those mistakes!; +98|6597|USA Biznatch!

Thanks I got Diskeeper 2008 Pro . And just to keep it all in one topic what is the best firewall. I had zonealarm but it limits too much even when I change the settings =/. Thanks.

2008-06-16 09:23:37

#9

chittydog: less busy; +586|7105|Kubra, Damn it!

We use Diskeeper at my work. Our helpdesk guys are trying to change corporate policy to get it removed since it's caused some disk corruption.

2008-06-16 09:44:08

#10

Brasso: member; +1,549|6900

Freezer7Pro wrote:
Mitch92uK wrote:
I tend to use the windows one just because i thought it did the job .. might have to try defraggler too now
Windows defragger is very ineffective.

Also, Diskeeper is free. Everything is free.

It's what I use as well. Although I read a review of defrag programs in either PC Magazine or Maximum PC and Diskeeper wasn't the best.

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-06-16 10:00:42

#11

Drykill: I Like Waffles.; +47|6962|England

I've been using IObit Smartdefrag since the early beta days and its a brilliant bit of software and free too. http://www.iobit.com/iobitsmartdefrag.html if your interested.

2008-06-16 10:06:17

#12

sportsman11-2cool4u: We can be those mistakes!; +98|6597|USA Biznatch!

Thanks for all the help, karma given out. Now the OP is edited thanks for everything!

2008-06-16 11:17:30

#13

Brasso: member; +1,549|6900

I've been using ZoneAlarm for XP and I love it. But if you're on Vista, I wouldn't really worry about a firewall. The built-in one is good enough.

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-06-16 11:36:57

#14

warhero1: Eon8 failure:O; +12|6718

haffeysucks wrote:
I've been using ZoneAlarm for XP and I love it. But if you're on Vista, I wouldn't really worry about a firewall. The built-in one is good enough.

Yeah I use the built-in firewall in Vista and I haven't noticed any problems.

2008-06-16 12:49:52

#15

rammunition: Fully Loaded; +143|6131

check this site out of anything free, it does suggest a good free firewall and defragment software

http://www.techsupportalert.com/all-freeware-summary

2008-06-16 13:14:23

#16

Drykill: I Like Waffles.; +47|6962|England

I've been using Kaspersky for about 2 years now and its a relatively hastle free firewall. Year license off ebay is only a few quid so doesn't cost much. Only problem is it can slow torrents down so just pause it when using torrents.

2008-06-16 13:18:45

#17

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|7026|Scotland

Don't touch Karspersky, Norton or any of the big ones. Grab NOD32. You will love it.

2008-06-16 13:21:41

#18

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6759|Gogledd Cymru

Zimmer wrote:
Don't touch Karspersky, Norton or any of the big ones. Grab NOD32. You will love it.

ESET Smart Security > NOD32

2008-06-16 13:22:19

#19

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone

The Sheriff wrote:
Zimmer wrote:
Don't touch Karspersky, Norton or any of the big ones. Grab NOD32. You will love it.
ESET Smart Security > NOD32

Thats the same dude.

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-06-16 13:23:04

#20

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6792|...

dd-wrt (firmware) firewall builder > software lolwalls

Last edited by jsnipy (2008-06-16 13:23:29)

2008-06-16 13:25:03

#21

sportsman11-2cool4u: We can be those mistakes!; +98|6597|USA Biznatch!

What about the Comodo or something? I heard it doesn't mess with the download speed. I want one that won't interfere with my downloading at all . Thanks.

2008-06-16 13:26:36

#22

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6837|NYC / Hamburg

harware firewalls / a router is way better than a software firewall.

as for defrag. O&O is a really nice program

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2008-06-16 13:27:39

#23

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6759|Gogledd Cymru

.Sup wrote:
The Sheriff wrote:
Zimmer wrote:
Don't touch Karspersky, Norton or any of the big ones. Grab NOD32. You will love it.
ESET Smart Security > NOD32
Thats the same dude.

Newer version of NOD dude.

2008-06-16 13:28:48

#24

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone

The Sheriff wrote:
.Sup wrote:
The Sheriff wrote:

ESET Smart Security > NOD32
Thats the same dude.
Newer version of NOD dude.

Link plz.

2008-06-16 13:29:59

#25

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6467|Winland

.Sup wrote:
The Sheriff wrote:
.Sup wrote:

Thats the same dude.
Newer version of NOD dude.
Link plz.

...dude.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

BF2S Forums Good defrag sofware.

sportsman11-2cool4u wrote:

Mitch92uK wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Mitch92uK wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

.Sup wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

.Sup wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

.Sup wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Board footer