Vax
Member
+42|6274|Flyover country

God Save the Queen wrote:

captured Iraqi documents that show how Saddam thought he had a WMD program.  Interviews with his highest ranking generals that said that if they wanted to live or stay at the top in their positions, they had to tell saddam shit he wanted to hear. 

Saddam thought he had em.
Another factor reduced Iraq's military effectiveness: sanctions. For more than a dozen years, UN sanctions had frayed the fiber of the Iraqi military by making it difficult for Baghdad to purchase new equipment, procure spare parts, or fund adequate training. Attempts to overcome the effects of the sanctions led Saddam to create the Military Industrial Commission as a means to sustain the military. The commission and a series of subordinate organizations steadily promised new capabilities to offset the effects of poor training, poor morale, and neglected equipment. Saddam apparently waited for the delivery of wonder weapons that would reverse the erosion of his military strength.

A captured Military Industrial Commission annual report of investments made in 2002Ð3 showed more than 170 research projects with an estimated budget of about 1.5 percent of Iraq's GDP. The commission divided projects among areas such as equipment, engineering, missiles, electronics, strategic weapons, artillery, and air forces. One senior Iraqi official alleged that the commission's leaders were so fearful of Saddam that when he ordered them to initiate weapons programs that they knew Iraq could not develop, they told him they could accomplish the projects with ease. Later, when Saddam asked for updates on the nonexistent projects, they simply faked plans and designs to show progress.

This constant stream of false reporting undoubtedly accounts for why many of Saddam's calculations on operational, strategic, and political issues made perfect sense to him. According to Aziz, "The people in the Military Industrial Commission were liars. They lied to you, and they lied to Saddam. They were always saying that they were producing or procuring special weapons so that they could get favors out of Saddam -- money, cars, everything -- but they were liars. If they did all of this business and brought in all of these secret weapons, why didn't [the weapons] work?" 

Members of the Military Industrial Commission were not the only liars. Bending the truth was particularly common among the most trusted members of Saddam's inner circle -- especially when negative news might reflect poorly on the teller's abilities or reputation. According to one former high-ranking Baath Party official, "Saddam had an idea about Iraq's conventional and potential unconventional capabilities, but never an accurate one because of the extensive lying occurring in that area. Many reports were falsified. The ministers attempted to convey a positive perspective with reports, which were forwarded to Saddam's secretary, who in turn passed them up to Saddam." In the years before Operation Iraqi Freedom, everyone around Saddam understood that his need to hear only good news was constantly growing and that it was in their best interest to feed that hunger.
source

Last edited by Vax (2008-06-22 12:02:51)

usmarine2
Banned
+233|6213|Dublin, Ohio
hmmmm.  interesting.

maybe all of the cry babies about wmd's should stuff it.

Last edited by usmarine2 (2008-06-22 12:03:32)

Vax
Member
+42|6274|Flyover country
David Kay said the same thing

But Mr. Kay's Study Group has also discovered plenty to suggest that Saddam couldn't come clean because he knew he wasn't. In his interim report last year, Mr. Kay disclosed a previously unknown Iraq program for long-range missiles; this was a direct violation of U.N. resolutions.

Mr. Kay has also speculated that Saddam may have thought he had WMD because his own generals and scientists lied to him. "The scientists were able to fake programs," the chief inspector says. This is entirely plausible, because aides who didn't tell Saddam what he wanted to hear were often tortured and killed. We know from post-invasion interrogations that Saddam's own generals believed that Iraq had WMD. If they thought so, it's hard to fault the CIA for believing it too.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6765|tropical regions of london

ZombieVampire! wrote:

Or some reliable news service.


In fact, for something like that, I'd be suspicious if I didn't hear about it from at least 2 sources.
well I cant necessarily post the essays and articles that I read from Foreign Affairs magazine everytime I pinch a loaf.  But, Ill search, just for you bubs.
usmarine2
Banned
+233|6213|Dublin, Ohio
I am sure CNN covered these stories right?

I bet they were all over the BBC also.

lulz...rhetorical I know.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6765|tropical regions of london

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Marine is only skeptical of things that don't match his predispositions.
I would trust GS over any of your awesome non bias accurate news sources that you may peruse.
You trust a fag over news media?
youre such a troll.  Although, Ive come to expect this from you.  Grow up.
usmarine2
Banned
+233|6213|Dublin, Ohio

God Save the Queen wrote:

ZombieVampire! wrote:

Or some reliable news service.


In fact, for something like that, I'd be suspicious if I didn't hear about it from at least 2 sources.
well I cant necessarily post the essays and articles that I read from Foreign Affairs magazine every time I pinch a loaf.  But, Ill search, just for you bubs.
I wonder why people can't look their own shit up if they do not believe someone.  This is not a fucking book report in college.  if you do not believe it, then go prove it wrong.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6765|tropical regions of london
I think Vax took care of all the sources all the nay sayers needed.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6765|tropical regions of london

Vax wrote:

God Save the Queen wrote:

captured Iraqi documents that show how Saddam thought he had a WMD program.  Interviews with his highest ranking generals that said that if they wanted to live or stay at the top in their positions, they had to tell saddam shit he wanted to hear. 

Saddam thought he had em.
Another factor reduced Iraq's military effectiveness: sanctions. For more than a dozen years, UN sanctions had frayed the fiber of the Iraqi military by making it difficult for Baghdad to purchase new equipment, procure spare parts, or fund adequate training. Attempts to overcome the effects of the sanctions led Saddam to create the Military Industrial Commission as a means to sustain the military. The commission and a series of subordinate organizations steadily promised new capabilities to offset the effects of poor training, poor morale, and neglected equipment. Saddam apparently waited for the delivery of wonder weapons that would reverse the erosion of his military strength.

A captured Military Industrial Commission annual report of investments made in 2002Ð3 showed more than 170 research projects with an estimated budget of about 1.5 percent of Iraq's GDP. The commission divided projects among areas such as equipment, engineering, missiles, electronics, strategic weapons, artillery, and air forces. One senior Iraqi official alleged that the commission's leaders were so fearful of Saddam that when he ordered them to initiate weapons programs that they knew Iraq could not develop, they told him they could accomplish the projects with ease. Later, when Saddam asked for updates on the nonexistent projects, they simply faked plans and designs to show progress.

This constant stream of false reporting undoubtedly accounts for why many of Saddam's calculations on operational, strategic, and political issues made perfect sense to him. According to Aziz, "The people in the Military Industrial Commission were liars. They lied to you, and they lied to Saddam. They were always saying that they were producing or procuring special weapons so that they could get favors out of Saddam -- money, cars, everything -- but they were liars. If they did all of this business and brought in all of these secret weapons, why didn't [the weapons] work?" 

Members of the Military Industrial Commission were not the only liars. Bending the truth was particularly common among the most trusted members of Saddam's inner circle -- especially when negative news might reflect poorly on the teller's abilities or reputation. According to one former high-ranking Baath Party official, "Saddam had an idea about Iraq's conventional and potential unconventional capabilities, but never an accurate one because of the extensive lying occurring in that area. Many reports were falsified. The ministers attempted to convey a positive perspective with reports, which were forwarded to Saddam's secretary, who in turn passed them up to Saddam." In the years before Operation Iraqi Freedom, everyone around Saddam understood that his need to hear only good news was constantly growing and that it was in their best interest to feed that hunger.
source
I have the exact same issue sitting in my bathroom as we speak.  They also talk about the special relationship the US and Britain have.  Thats the exact source that I would have looked for
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7179|Argentina

God Save the Queen wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2 wrote:


I would trust GS over any of your awesome non bias accurate news sources that you may peruse.
You trust a fag over news media?
youre such a troll.  Although, Ive come to expect this from you.  Grow up.
Lulz
Vax
Member
+42|6274|Flyover country
I'm still reading it, friggin long article.
 
Very interesting though.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6959|Long Island, New York
Children, children. Settle down. Can't we handle this like adults?

https://espn.go.com/photo/2006/0905/pg2_a_octagon_275.jpg
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7251|Grapevine, TX
He didnt suck....
https://www.shieldsnet.org/images/strange/rubens_bill_and_monica.jpg

She did.    Oh wait... nvm
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6765|tropical regions of london

Vax wrote:

I'm still reading it, friggin long article.
 
Very interesting though.
Ive read it a bunch of times.  Its part of my recycled reading material.
usmarine2
Banned
+233|6213|Dublin, Ohio
pr0n
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7054|949

God Save the Queen wrote:

ZombieVampire! wrote:

Or some reliable news service.


In fact, for something like that, I'd be suspicious if I didn't hear about it from at least 2 sources.
well I cant necessarily post the essays and articles that I read from Foreign Affairs magazine everytime I pinch a loaf.  But, Ill search, just for you bubs.
You could also quote Foreign Policy magazine, The Nation (super liberal), a myriad of US News and World Reports/Newsweek articles.  It's a fact that has come to light especially in the last 2 years.

You know, this is a recurring theme here in DST - the "I don't want to look up information, so just link it for me or else it's not true" type mentality.  Oh well.

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-06-22 12:26:49)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6827|North Carolina

Vax wrote:

source
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?ti … _Relations

"The CFR dates back to 1921, and in 1996 published its history, available on its website.

The membership of the CFR includes past Presidents, Ambassadors, Secretaries of State, Wall Street investors, international bankers, foundation executives, think tank executives, lobbyist lawyers, NATO and Pentagon military leaders, wealthy industrialists, journalists, media owners and executives, university presidents and key professors, select Congressmen, Supreme Court Justices, Federal Judges, wealthy entrepreneurs, and as many as ten 9-11 Commission Members.

Due perhaps more to its origins, associations, and history, than to its current composition and activities, the CFR does have a reputation as one of the "triumvirate of elite organizations" together with the Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission. Elitism doesn't necessarily preclude the ability to provide unbiased and useful service however.

Carroll Quigley, Professor of History at Georgetown University, stated, "The Council of Foreign Relations is the American Branch of a society which originated in England and believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."

They hold regular private meetings including members, and very select guests. Occasionally they will hold a public meeting, and invite the open press (including C-SPAN). The image of the CFR as a closed-shop bi-partisan discussion forum for the foreign policy establishment has fuelled criticism that the organisation and its members are controlling world policy and events."


It sounds like the Council on Foreign Relations is knowledgable but has an agenda in its own right.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7054|949

Turquoise wrote:

Vax wrote:

source
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?ti … _Relations

"The CFR dates back to 1921, and in 1996 published its history, available on its website.

The membership of the CFR includes past Presidents, Ambassadors, Secretaries of State, Wall Street investors, international bankers, foundation executives, think tank executives, lobbyist lawyers, NATO and Pentagon military leaders, wealthy industrialists, journalists, media owners and executives, university presidents and key professors, select Congressmen, Supreme Court Justices, Federal Judges, wealthy entrepreneurs, and as many as ten 9-11 Commission Members.

Due perhaps more to its origins, associations, and history, than to its current composition and activities, the CFR does have a reputation as one of the "triumvirate of elite organizations" together with the Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission. Elitism doesn't necessarily preclude the ability to provide unbiased and useful service however.

Carroll Quigley, Professor of History at Georgetown University, stated, "The Council of Foreign Relations is the American Branch of a society which originated in England and believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."

They hold regular private meetings including members, and very select guests. Occasionally they will hold a public meeting, and invite the open press (including C-SPAN). The image of the CFR as a closed-shop bi-partisan discussion forum for the foreign policy establishment has fuelled criticism that the organisation and its members are controlling world policy and events."


It sounds like the Council on Foreign Relations is knowledgable but has an agenda in its own right.
Despite being controlled by the CFR, "Foreign Affairs" magazine is fairly spot on in international relations.  I've subscribed to it for over 5 years (ever since I was forced to by one of my teachers).
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6827|North Carolina
Fair enough, but the question remains...  Does this mean we invaded due to Saddam's own delusional deception of having WMD's, or was it something else?
Vax
Member
+42|6274|Flyover country

Turquoise wrote:

It sounds like the Council on Foreign Relations is knowledgable but has an agenda in its own right.
Noted. 
Do you think the information in that article is compromised by this agenda ?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6827|North Carolina

Vax wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

It sounds like the Council on Foreign Relations is knowledgable but has an agenda in its own right.
Noted. 
Do you think the information in that article is compromised by this agenda ?
I don't know, but the situation does make a little more sense now.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6765|tropical regions of london
its funny how this is news to so many
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7054|949

Turquoise wrote:

Fair enough, but the question remains...  Does this mean we invaded due to Saddam's own delusional deception of having WMD's, or was it something else?
Obviously ulterior motives.
Vax
Member
+42|6274|Flyover country

Turquoise wrote:

Fair enough, but the question remains...  Does this mean we invaded due to Saddam's own delusional deception of having WMD's, or was it something else?
I 'm not trying to speculate on the entire motivation, there were lots of reasons -- I'm just trying to show that it may not be so shocking that people thought he had WMD's when he apparently did not.
I keep seeing people say that UN weapons inspectors knew there were no WMD, I don't think that is accurate.

I think it was complicated, there was a ton of subterfuge and BS surrounding the whole weapons thing.

Saddam wanted everyone to think he had them, but then later this caused problems, and he wanted to appear to be compliant with the UN...but he wanted Iran to think he had the stuff...trying to have it both ways.

Last edited by Vax (2008-06-22 12:49:02)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6827|North Carolina

God Save the Queen wrote:

its funny how this is news to so many
I'm sorry GS, I was too busy observing how much profit the contractors were making with my tax money.

Last edited by Turquoise (2008-06-22 12:46:31)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard