• Index » 
  • Community » 
  • Tech » 
  • SO whats the best SINGLE core graphics card right now?
ELITE-UK
Scratching my back
+170|6743|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND
So im definately getting a new graphics card this weekend.

Im wanting a single card only so i dont want the 48 x2 or gx2..

I just cant make my mid up as to which is best for the money, im ruling out the 280 gtx as it costs way to much for what its worth...

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu … =GX-100-HT

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu … l%20DVI%20(PCI-Express)%20-%20Retail

Those are the 2 im looking at.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6819|UK

Why would you discount the 4870X2?  You (or indeed anyone) do not know what it will be like.  They have apparantly worked on the micro suttering issue, and many other of the issues assoiated with dual GPU cards (I read stuff about shared memory which is a big plus for one).  The reason it isnt out yet is because there hammering the drivers so upon release it actually behaves, quote, ''Like a single core card''.

However, if you have to just stick to a single core it's a 4870 every day of the week.

Martyn
Brasso
member
+1,549|6900

Out of those two, definitely the 4870.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6733|cuntshitlake

4870 is not only cheaper, but also performs better.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,054|7041|PNW

DeathUnlimited wrote:

4870 is not only cheaper, but also performs better.
I'll wait until I can find solid benchmarks that aren't old and products of forum rumor mills before I decide.
ELITE-UK
Scratching my back
+170|6743|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND
I think im tipping towards the GTX 260, more video ram will help me with the higher resolutions and stuff.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6819|UK

ELITE-UK wrote:

I think im tipping towards the GTX 260, more video ram will help me with the higher resolutions and stuff.
The memory on the ATi card is running faster (effectivly) so in this instance less is more.  The ATi card has a bigger bandwith than the GTX 260 which is the important figure (or atleast one of them), it's the bandwith that allows you to crank the rez and AA more so than the memory.  Though the memory is imporant, unlike many who dunno what there talking about, 512 is a standard I think that will remain with us for some time yet.

You cant just look at 896Mb and say well that is > 512.  Mathmatically fine, but since when was hardware as linear as that, you have to account for GDDR5.  Look at the bandwiths.

Martyn

Last edited by Bell (2008-06-25 14:12:14)

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6890|London, England
The price difference between the 4870 and 260 is quite alot, if that doesn't concern you, clearly buying a GTX 280 won't either. And the 280 is the most powerful card out there atm.
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone
GX2. Lol wait you are the guy that actually bought a GX2 right? No, seriously wait a bit more for a ATI X2.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6733|cuntshitlake

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

4870 is not only cheaper, but also performs better.
I'll wait until I can find solid benchmarks that aren't old and products of forum rumor mills before I decide.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone

DeathUnlimited wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

4870 is not only cheaper, but also performs better.
I'll wait until I can find solid benchmarks that aren't old and products of forum rumor mills before I decide.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341
Wait is over for newbie
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6763|N. Ireland
4870
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone
Oh single core card Why single core? What res. are you running?
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6733|cuntshitlake

.Sup wrote:

Oh single core card Why single core? What res. are you running?
As a side note, no GPUs are single core

Single GPU cards would be more correct.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6819|UK

DeathUnlimited wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Oh single core card Why single core? What res. are you running?
As a side note, no GPUs are single core

Single GPU cards would be more correct.
I had a guy correct me on that the other day on a form.  I proceeded to call his mother a fat whore and that he was an ugly dumb fat fuck (twas a bad day ).

Lmao

Martyn
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6733|cuntshitlake

Bell wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Oh single core card Why single core? What res. are you running?
As a side note, no GPUs are single core

Single GPU cards would be more correct.
I had a guy correct me on that the other day on a form.  I proceeded to call his mother a fat whore and that he was an ugly dumb fat fuck (twas a bad day ).

Lmao

Martyn
I have been extremely knit-picky for a couple of days :S
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6723|The Twilight Zone
Oh I always say single core instead of single GPU. So sue me!
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
ELITE-UK
Scratching my back
+170|6743|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND

.Sup wrote:

GX2. Lol wait you are the guy that actually bought a GX2 right? No, seriously wait a bit more for a ATI X2.
Yes i was, bad experiences with the X2 type of cards just put me right off the whole idea.
Volatile
Member
+252|6974|Sextupling in Empire

Aapje wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

4870 is not only cheaper, but also performs better.
I'll wait until I can find solid benchmarks that aren't old and products of forum rumor mills before I decide.
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=58 … &pid=1
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1481/s … index.html
http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/ATI … s_Arrived/
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc. … 41&p=1
http://techreport.com/articles.x/14990

Unfortunately techsite reviews don't always equate to what one can expect on their own system. I've seen a number of reviews from users that say the actual performance of a 4850 is = 8800gt.

ELITE-UK wrote:

.Sup wrote:

GX2. Lol wait you are the guy that actually bought a GX2 right? No, seriously wait a bit more for a ATI X2.
Yes i was, bad experiences with the X2 type of cards just put me right off the whole idea.
I stepped up to a 9800GX2 when it was released and it ran like crap on my system. I got better performance with my 8800gts than I did with that GX2 card.

I personally won't ever go that route again.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7035|Cambridge (UK)

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Bell wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:


As a side note, no GPUs are single core

Single GPU cards would be more correct.
I had a guy correct me on that the other day on a form.  I proceeded to call his mother a fat whore and that he was an ugly dumb fat fuck (twas a bad day ).

Lmao

Martyn
I have been extremely knit-picky for a couple of days :S
You beat me to it.

Git.

  • Index » 
  • Community » 
  • Tech » 
  • SO whats the best SINGLE core graphics card right now?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard