.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6875|The Twilight Zone
haha good news here it is:

A federal judge is awarding Tanya Andersen, who defeated the Recording Industry Association of America's file sharing lawsuit, $108,000 in legal fees to compensate for defending herself against the RIAA.
The award, made public Wedesday by U.S. District Judge James A. Redden of Oregon, marks the second time that a target of the RIAA who beat a lawsuit was awarded attorney's fees. In August, a federal judge ordered the RIAA to pay $68,685 in litigation costs to two Oklahoma women whose case was dismissed.
Whether RIAA defendants who successfully defend such suits are automatically entitled to legal fees is on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The dispute is whether judges must award fees to a prevailing party under the Copyright Act.
Judge Redden ruled (.pdf) that RIAA's arguments against legal fees were "misplaced."
"An award of attorney's fees to the prevailing party are 'the rule rather than the exception' under the Copyright Act, and 'should be awarded routinely,'" Redden wrote.
The RIAA dropped the case against Andersen last year after concluding her hard drive didn't contain purloined music tracks. The RIAA initially claimed a Kazaa shared directory that linked to her internet-protocol address was unlawfully distributing thousands of songs.
In response to the lawsuit against her, Andersen has countersued the RIAA in a case seeking class-action status to represent what her attorneys say is thousands of persons wrongly sued by the RIAA. That case has been dismissed three times, and its fourth try is pending.
Andersen attorney Lory Lybeck requested $300,000 and the RIAA suggested $30,000 was more appropriate. The award is upwards of $190 a hour.
The RIAA has sued more than 20,000 people for copyright infringement.
Source - Wired Threat Level
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6913|Northern California
What the HELL is going on????  All this good news from the courts!!  Maybe this is the calm before friggen Armageddon!!  **puts on tinfoil hat and sits in corner sucking thumb**
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7023|132 and Bush

The RIAA is fighting an impossible battle. They need to focus on other ways to capitalize on the internet. If they are creative enough they will be able to offer something that will entice consumers to open their wallets.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
chittydog
less busy
+586|7257|Kubra, Damn it!

Before everyone gets too happy and starts a downloading spree, reread the article:

Wired wrote:

The RIAA dropped the case against Andersen last year after concluding her hard drive didn't contain purloined music tracks.
This doesn't mean you'll win your case when the RIAA sues you for all the mp3s you DLed. It means IF you win your case because you never illegally downloaded music and spent an assload on lawyers, they'll have to pay your legal fees.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard