They use a GFX card incapable of DX10?
I have a high end PC (well, a couple of generations old, E6600 and 8800GTX) and I get 40% more FPS in XP over Vista in DX9 games.Stimey wrote:
They use a GFX card incapable of DX10?
If I get almost 400FPS in BF2 on low settings and ~120 on high with 4x AA. I can't imagine what a new card's going to be like. Even with less FPS people have been talking about with Vista. 200FPS on high would be niceSydney wrote:
I have a high end PC (well, a couple of generations old, E6600 and 8800GTX) and I get 40% more FPS in XP over Vista in DX9 games.Stimey wrote:
They use a GFX card incapable of DX10?
Crysis on XP still looks nicer than COD4 on Vista.ebug9 wrote:
If I get almost 400FPS in BF2 on low settings and ~120 on high with 4x AA. I can't imagine what a new card's going to be like. Even with less FPS people have been talking about with Vista. 200FPS on high would be niceSydney wrote:
I have a high end PC (well, a couple of generations old, E6600 and 8800GTX) and I get 40% more FPS in XP over Vista in DX9 games.Stimey wrote:
They use a GFX card incapable of DX10?
I'm interested to see what CoD4 looks like with DX 10
Pffft...Crysis. Who needs that..Sup wrote:
Crysis on XP still looks nicer than COD4 on Vista.
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2008-06-29 09:11:04)
Whoops...my bad.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Since when does CoD4 support DX10?
And I have that ram, it's awesome.
Oh, I should also have said, "...and whether you mind asking Microsoft nicely for the 64bit version (assuming you're buying retail (if you're getting OEM, make 100% sure it is 64bit))" - see here (towards end of page)ebug9 wrote:
Not at all....looks like I just saved myself $80Scorpion0x17 wrote:
So, the question comes down to, do you mind sometimes having to reinstall everything?
Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2008-06-29 19:11:46)