Lul. You'll get used to the archers. They're easy to take out too. When you're running towards them, they'll just warn and aim at you. You can practically walk up to them and assassinate them. They're also really easy to take out with throwing knives.FatherTed wrote:
I'm in Acre now.
Man this city sucks, just one big run down dump.
WITH ARCHERS ON EVERY FUCKING ROOF.
Last edited by Goven (2008-01-25 15:32:17)
Haha, motherfucker.FatherTed wrote:
I'm in Acre now.
Man this city sucks, just one big run down dump.
WITH ARCHERS ON EVERY FUCKING ROOF.
Last edited by Archer (2008-01-26 05:27:09)
Archer wrote:
Haha, motherfucker.FatherTed wrote:
I'm in Acre now.
Man this city sucks, just one big run down dump.
WITH ARCHERS ON EVERY FUCKING ROOF.
x2The Sheriff wrote:
Archer wrote:
Haha, motherfucker.FatherTed wrote:
I'm in Acre now.
Man this city sucks, just one big run down dump.
WITH ARCHERS ON EVERY FUCKING ROOF.
Yep, running high profile hidden blade kills ftw.Goven wrote:
Lul. You'll get used to the archers. They're easy to take out too. When you're running towards them, they'll just warn and aim at you. You can practically walk up to them and assassinate them. They're also really easy to take out with throwing knives.FatherTed wrote:
I'm in Acre now.
Man this city sucks, just one big run down dump.
WITH ARCHERS ON EVERY FUCKING ROOF.
Haha that's incredible! +1KuriVaiM (EST) wrote:
check this out bored AC-fans: life of ancient assassin, Altair. Will he be able to attempt assassination without attracting attention in this bustling Jerusalem marketplace i almost gagged myself by laughing, too damn hilarious
I played it at someones house just couldn't get into it too many unskippable cutscenes.FatherTed wrote:
Well, i've played a grand total of about 20 minutes on this game, and it bores me feckless.
Same for anyone else?
Agree 100% RandomSchl.RandomSchl wrote:
I thought it was awesome. Too bad I had to wait months after the console versions came out to get it. The only thing I didn't like about it was that after you complete the game, theres no reward like a hidden memory block where you have every weapon and can do whatever you want. I just don't like to have to start at the last memory block and listen to the cut scene in the beginning. Also I heard there was no reward for collecting all the flags which I thought was extremely lame. I mean theres hundreds of flags and you don't get diddly squat when you get them all?
IIRC, it's going to be a trilogy, so maybe we'll see stuff like that in future versions!TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Agree 100% RandomSchl.RandomSchl wrote:
I thought it was awesome. Too bad I had to wait months after the console versions came out to get it. The only thing I didn't like about it was that after you complete the game, theres no reward like a hidden memory block where you have every weapon and can do whatever you want. I just don't like to have to start at the last memory block and listen to the cut scene in the beginning. Also I heard there was no reward for collecting all the flags which I thought was extremely lame. I mean theres hundreds of flags and you don't get diddly squat when you get them all?
I really enjoyed it, I'm not sure why so many people were like "wah its boring"...sure it could be improved, but as far as a first game goes it is brilliant.
Imagine the climbing system coupled with an Oblivion-esque do whatever you want roleplaying system, and an improved combat system...and you have an amazing game.
I think if they keep the style the same, it'd work wherever it was set.TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Hopefully. Although it seems the next two wont be in the same time period, which was kind of what made it so unique.
I guess. Swords and throwing knives were always much "cooler" than sniper rifles for me. In saying that I love the Hitman series.FatherTed wrote:
I think if they keep the style the same, it'd work wherever it was set.TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Hopefully. Although it seems the next two wont be in the same time period, which was kind of what made it so unique.
They did a very good job of setting the mood and tone of the game (not to mention the visuals) and that's very important for a good game.
As long as he keeps his hidden blade, i'll be happy!TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
I guess. Swords and throwing knives were always much "cooler" than sniper rifles for me. In saying that I love the Hitman series.FatherTed wrote:
I think if they keep the style the same, it'd work wherever it was set.TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Hopefully. Although it seems the next two wont be in the same time period, which was kind of what made it so unique.
They did a very good job of setting the mood and tone of the game (not to mention the visuals) and that's very important for a good game.
lol i thought his name was farthead instead of father ted lol. sry.{HMS}_Sir_Del_Boy wrote:
Not really the wrong thread. After all you did say you're bored with AC...so why not try that game? And just cos it's going for less than £18 doesn't mean it's crap. It's got above average reviews and Rainbow 6 Vegas is also going for less than £18 - and that's not a shite game!FatherTed wrote:
Wrong thread for that, and the description you just gave explains its price{HMS}_Sir_Del_Boy wrote:
Has anybody got The Darkness? I heard that there's these 2 snake-like demons hanging around your shoulders that like devouring hearts and stuff like that + a plot to do with the supernatural and the Mafia. It's currently going for less than £18 here in the UK.
Last edited by eaglecorps (2008-06-29 14:37:13)
I feel somewhat less safe after reading that.
