Whoah, I just saw - Daniel Craig is 40?!?!?
He looks like he's in his early 30's!
Damn!
He looks like he's in his early 30's!
Damn!
Looks pretty awesome to me
I loved Casino Royale.
I loved Casino Royale.
I didn't like Brosnan, he was too wet.
Craig brings a new gritty edge to the franchise. The old stereotype of the British gentleman was really wearing thin with me. As others have said I love the new direction the franchise is going.
Craig brings a new gritty edge to the franchise. The old stereotype of the British gentleman was really wearing thin with me. As others have said I love the new direction the franchise is going.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
I preferred Pierce, but I guess thats just because the last movie didn't have that... Bond feel to it, maybe his one will bring me back.
Very true. After all the man is an assassin. Craig is doing a good job so far. No complaints at all.KILLSWITCH wrote:
I didn't like Brosnan, he was too wet.
Craig brings a new gritty edge to the franchise. The old stereotype of the British gentleman was really wearing thin with me. As others have said I love the new direction the franchise is going.
I like the new assassiny-type Bond, very cool indeed, although I was still a Brosnan fan.
Serious Flex
Looks awesome as always. And yeah I like the "new" more realistic Bond. They've brought the character slightly back down to earth.
Humm, about to go and watch the trailer. Must say my fav Bond was Brosnan....Craig not bad but....there is that "Bond, James Bond." Feeling that is missing with him. Anyway....odd title for a Bond movie.
lolRoger Lesboules wrote:
Anyway....odd title for a Bond movie.
Bond films have some of the oddest/stupidest titles of them all. Goldeneye was one of the very few titles that actually had something to do with the film (ok, and Casino Royale, I suppose)
and Moonraker
Ok not all, but most
Yup, must admit that some title were wierd. The man with the golden gun was okay too...Humm.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
lolRoger Lesboules wrote:
Anyway....odd title for a Bond movie.
Bond films have some of the oddest/stupidest titles of them all. Goldeneye was one of the very few titles that actually had something to do with the film (ok, and Casino Royale, I suppose)
and Moonraker
Ok not all, but most
Anyway, i guess that the movie is based on a book bearing the same title....right? Or else i will have to laugh at the wierd name they took.
goldeneye> any other bond movie
QFT!gatorlova wrote:
goldeneye> any other bond movie
I was about to say it, but double post and all.
This looks sweet, I can't wait! Craig > All.
Fixed for great justice. Though Everything or Nothing was very good IMOgatorlova wrote:
goldeneye> any other bond game
CR was pretty good, but I like the style of the older bond films better. That said, I'm still going to make a trip the the theater to see QoS.
Rouge Bond, kewl.
Definately going to see this, I can't wait!!!
They always spoil the film when they say the title. ie "you live to die another day" or "so the world is not enough"
I have a Quantum of Solacekylef wrote:
They always spoil the film when they say the title. ie "you live to die another day" or "so the world is not enough"
I spy a DBS
It looks pretty nice, too bad Spoiler (highlight to read):
they killed Eva Green in the first one
they killed Eva Green in the first one
They ruined one during production afaikJenspm wrote:
I spy a DBS
i want to quantum kyle in his solace