X-bit labs ReviewTable of contents:
* Testbed and Methods
* Performance in Third-Person 3D Shooters
* Battlefield 2142
* BioShock
* Call of Juarez
* Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
* Crysis
* Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
* Half-Life 2: Episode Two
* S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl
* Performance in Third-Person 3D Shooters
* Lost Planet: Extreme Condition
* Tomb Raider: Legend
* Performance in RPG
* Hellgate: London
* The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
* Performance in Strategies
* Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts
* Command & Conquer 3: Kane’s Wrath
* World in Conflict
* Performance in Synthetic Benchmarks
* Futuremark 3DMark06
* Futuremark 3DMark Vantage
* Conclusion
* ATI Radeon HD 4850: Summary
* ATI Radeon HD 4870: Summary
Merci buckets. Stupid 4850 still hasn't gone down in price now that the 4870 is out.
It will almost certainly go down when the 9800GTX+ comes out in a week or two.ebug9 wrote:
Merci buckets. Stupid 4850 still hasn't gone down in price now that the 4870 is out.
Martyn
How much more will it go down? Approx?Bell wrote:
It will almost certainly go down when the 9800GTX+ comes out in a week or two.ebug9 wrote:
Merci buckets. Stupid 4850 still hasn't gone down in price now that the 4870 is out.
Martyn
Nvidia said something like $199 for the normal 9800GTX and $229 for the 9800GTX+. If the + beats the 4850, you would expect ATi to either start really pushing for overclocked versions of the 4850 and/or cut the price of stock 4850s.Gooners wrote:
How much more will it go down? Approx?Bell wrote:
It will almost certainly go down when the 9800GTX+ comes out in a week or two.ebug9 wrote:
Merci buckets. Stupid 4850 still hasn't gone down in price now that the 4870 is out.
Martyn
Martyn
I meant for the 4850.Bell wrote:
Nvidia said something like $199 for the normal 9800GTX and $229 for the 9800GTX+. If the + beats the 4850, you would expect ATi to either start really pushing for overclocked versions of the 4850 and/or cut the price of stock 4850s.Gooners wrote:
How much more will it go down? Approx?Bell wrote:
It will almost certainly go down when the 9800GTX+ comes out in a week or two.
Martyn
Martyn
Well you tell me If Nvidia drop tp $229 and $199 then the 4850 to remain competative in a part of the market where every $/£ count's then they would have to bring it down accordingly. I'd say a cut would be proportional to how much better the GTX+ is over it. As in, if th GTX+ is 10% quicker than a 4850, I'd say a 4850 would drop by 10%.Gooners wrote:
I meant for the 4850.Bell wrote:
Nvidia said something like $199 for the normal 9800GTX and $229 for the 9800GTX+. If the + beats the 4850, you would expect ATi to either start really pushing for overclocked versions of the 4850 and/or cut the price of stock 4850s.Gooners wrote:
How much more will it go down? Approx?
Martyn
Least I would do that (and push for factory OC cards, ATi havent really went down that route as much as Nvidia).
Edit: Or the partners havent I should say. You see SSC and XXX edition from Nvidia partners, but not so much from the red camp.
Martyn
Last edited by Bell (2008-07-06 09:57:06)
In the summary page for the 4870 it says one of the Low points is "High heat dissipation because of the non-optimal cooling system setup", I guess it means Low heat dissipation?
Does anyone know what temps the card is at idle and load?
Does anyone know what temps the card is at idle and load?
http://www.overclock.net/ati/350655-pos … temps.htmlDauntless wrote:
In the summary page for the 4870 it says one of the Low points is "High heat dissipation because of the non-optimal cooling system setup", I guess it means Low heat dissipation?
Does anyone know what temps the card is at idle and load?
I could tell you if I had a program to monitor it.
It can't be that hot though, the fan never goes at full speed....
It can't be that hot though, the fan never goes at full speed....
Get EVEREST, it monitors temps for it at least.Sup3r_Dr4gon wrote:
I could tell you if I had a program to monitor it.
It can't be that hot though, the fan never goes at full speed....
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
If you look at the price of the gtx260 on newegg it ranges between 300$ to 430$ and the gtx280 is 450$ to 670$. Quite desperate. I hope the mass profits from the ati cards will accelerate the amd cpu development.
Last edited by The#1Spot (2008-07-06 13:14:56)
If you think that'll inspire Intel to drop the $1000+ CPU prices, they'll just shrug it off.The#1Spot wrote:
If you look at the price of the gtx260 on newegg it ranges between 300$ to 430$ and the gtx280 is 450$ to 670$. Quite desperate. I hope the mass profits from the ati cards will accelerate the amd cpu development.
At the same time, it doesn't hurt for them to have some incentive to keep kicking along with their own CPU's other than the threat of the lackluster Phenoms. What kind of a Sega Genesis campaign is AMD running anyway?
'The Smarter choice.'
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2008-07-06 13:28:43)
Not really interested in the Intel line up. Just waiting for the tri cores to go down in price or more dual cores to be available.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
If you think that'll inspire Intel to drop the $1000+ CPU prices, they'll just shrug it off.The#1Spot wrote:
If you look at the price of the gtx260 on newegg it ranges between 300$ to 430$ and the gtx280 is 450$ to 670$. Quite desperate. I hope the mass profits from the ati cards will accelerate the amd cpu development.
At the same time, it doesn't hurt for them to have some incentive to keep kicking along with their own CPU's other than the threat of the lackluster Phenoms. What kind of a Sega Genesis campaign is AMD running anyway?
'The Smarter choice.'