BF2S Forums Poor Middle Eastern Dirt Farmers Never Bothered Anyone.......

why dont both of your chill the fuck out and make a point without acting like asshats.


or, feel free to continue....its just looks like some little kids arguing here, to tell you two the truth.

m3thod wrote:

usmarine2 wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Marianne gets told and has to resort to insults.  Our sexy mods must cringe at your posts. 

You want me to praise terrorists...OK I'll play your little game: Praise Atta and may his cock be delicately caressed by his 72 virgins.

you called me marianne first my dear.  go check.  you can climb down off your horse now.

I don't see how referring to you as Marianne is comparable to being referred as a terrorist supporter and sympathiser. 

No.  I like it up here.

well you started with the insults, then bitch about insults.

I dont take it as an insult dumb ass.  But you said I had to insult didnt you?  Read?

m3thod wrote:

No i said YOU had to resort to insults of which being told "go praise your suicide bombers or something" undoubtedly is.  I didn't say i WAS insulted.

Christ Marianne you're hard work.

well I was speaking to you dummy.  who else would be insulted?  stop trying to back yourself out of the corner.

usmarine2 wrote:

m3thod wrote:

No i said YOU had to resort to insults of which being told "go praise your suicide bombers or something" undoubtedly is.  I didn't say i WAS insulted.

Christ Marianne you're hard work.

well I was speaking to you dummy.  who else would be insulted?  stop trying to back yourself out of the corner.

I'll try to make this simple. 

Attempting to insult someone is very different from actually being insulted.

See again like above.  You've just referred to the fine gentleman that is me as a "Dummy".  It's not nice, yes?  We can all agree on this.

BUT

I'm I actually offended?  The answer would be NO! Becuase i know i am not a dummy.  In fact i'm very intelligent and rather good looking if i may say so.

Well you being you, i doubt you would have understood the above i am going to soil myself and communicate in a language you do undertand.

GO FIST YOURSELF!

/thread

m3thod wrote:

In fact i'm very intelligent and rather good looking if i may say so.

Lets not turn this into who is a more dapper man. Marine is quite the looker

probably but i bet they were a few raised eyebrows amongst the christian zionist crusaders when former crims from the motherland turn up in sexy secure eyerack.

Last edited by m3thod (2008-07-07 11:16:14)

FEOS wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

FEOS wrote:

We fingerprint ordinary people here, too. So do other countries. What's the big deal?

No we don't.  Haven't seen any fingerprint checkpoints here lately, what about you?

Let's see...marine already covered military. Then there's:

Anything requiring a background check:

- Schools
- Passports
- Jobs (varies)

Was there any mention in the article about "fingerprint checkpoints"? Must've missed that one.

Regardless, we don't have any other kind of checkpoints here except for the occasional DUI checkpoint...but our security situation is a bit different in the States than it is in Iraq, I'd wager.

No, the article is vague, and I jumped to the conclusion that they were just randomly fingerprinting people from the way the article was written.

I have no problem with people willingly giving up their personal data.

I tend to agree with this:

"The day when the federal government can tell people the basis they've been put on the watch list is the day we can have more confidence in biometric identification," said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

I don't really agree with this:

For example, a roadside bomb may explode and a patrol may fingerprint bystanders because insurgents have been known to remain at the scene to observe the results of their work. Prints also can be lifted off tiny fragments of exploded bombs, said military officials and contractors involved in the work.

And I think things like this should be expanded nationwide and implemented in more cases:

Since September 2006, Homeland Security and the FBI have been operating a pilot program in which police officers in Boston, Dallas and Houston run prints of arrestees against a Homeland Security database of immigration law violators and a State Department database of people refused visas. Federal job applicants' prints also are run against the databases. To date, some 500 people have been found in the database and thus are of interest to Homeland Security officials.

I don't agree with forced fingerprinting without reason.  Hope that clarifies.

they are

ZombieVampire! wrote:

Fingerprints aren't entirely unique are they?

common features and patterns, but unique as a whole.  Statistically, I'm sure there are people who have virtually identical prints.  but they aren't genetically identical.