_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6986|Riva, MD
http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37376/135/

I hope this is correct.

Taipei (Taiwan) – News about refreshed Xbox 360 consoles are trickling, which is about time given the fact that the console will celebrate its third birthday later this year. The Taiwan Economic News is reporting that first wafers with 65 nm GPUs are leaving the production lines, joining the 65 nm Xenon CPU. Rumors about a Blu-ray Xbox 360 remain alive and we are hearing first information about a possible mid-cycle refresh for the console, which will include the ‘Valhalla’ SoC.

It has been almost a year since Chartered has begun taking the Xbox 360 Xenon CPU from 90 nm to 65 nm and it really was just a matter of time until other hardware would follow. According to the Taiwan Economic News, TSMC has initiated first wafer starts of the 65 nm Xenos GPU and Northbridge. Microsoft apparently has ordered 10,000 300 mm wafers from TSMC at this time.

As it is the case with any die-shrink, Microsoft should see substantial economic advantages from this move, supporting the company’s ongoing strategy to reduce the production cost of the console (the reduction of the Xbox 360 production cost has been one of the key reasons why Microsoft’s entertainment division has been able to notably increase its profits over the past seven quarters). If the 65 nm Xenos "v2" scales down linearly from 90 nm, the new die size should be around 125 mm2, while the eDRAM chip will remain at 70 mm2. The new production process should yield about 35% more GPUs per wafer than before.   

TSMC will continue to be in charge of the wafers, while Nanya will be delivering the flip-chip packaging substrates. ASE combines the silicon and substrate and is responsible for QA.

Quite honestly, we were a bit surprised to hear that Microsoft did not decide to die-shrink both the CPU and GPU at the same time, especially because two different foundries are manufacturing the chips. However, our sources at TSMC explained that Microsoft has the same production philosophy as Nvidia: Wait for a manufacturing process to mature and then run the initial wafer order. Apparently, the transition was simulated in detail by ATI and the tapeout happened without problems, at least according to our sources close to ATI. Keep in mind that ATI is only a contracted partner for Microsoft: Both the CPU and GPU are officially Microsoft parts, and the Ballmer-Gates company is the only one in the console segment following through with such a strategy.

The Xbox 360 is scheduled to ship in an "all 65 nm" package (Jasper platform) this August. Consumers won’t notice the refresh, unless Microsoft decides to put a Blu-ray drive into the Xbox 360. We were not able to receive a confirmation either way, and we keep digging to find out if the Asustek subsidiary Pegatron will manufacture regular Xbox 360’s or units with an integrated Blu-ray drive. In any case, Celestica, Pegatron and Wistron will have a busy summer cranking out millions of refreshed Xbox 360 consoles.

A more dramatic and perhaps visible change will happen next year: TSMC plans to begin producing the Valhalla chip, which will be the foundation of the mid-cycle refresh of the Xbox 360, thus called ‘Xbox 2.5’ or simply ‘Xbox 540’ (360+180), in fall of 2009. We learned that this new chip is apparently much more than a die-shrink and end up as a system-on-a-chip design. This change is likely to enable to redesign the Xbox 360 casing and go towards a slim-design, much like what Sony did with the Gen1 and Gen2 PS2. We believe that TSMC will use a 45 nm process for this Multi-Chip-Module package (CPU+GPU+eDRAM).

There are also some interesting pieces of information that Microsoft is shopping for a more efficient cooling solution – efficient in more ways than just one: Several people close to the cooling industry told us that Microsoft approached them and asked for better and cheaper cooling than what is used in the Xbox 360 right now. Some may claim that the current Xbox 360 cooler design is already as cheap as it gets, but we have no doubts that Microsoft will find a way to drop the cost once again.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6130
Not another f**king version of the 360
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6986|Riva, MD

rammunition wrote:

Not another f**king version of the 360
Nobody's forcing you to buy it but this is the most likely change to get rid of the RRoD since it was the GPU that caused that problem.  Other than that, not much else has changed about it.  Maybe MS will drop the price like they did back when the 65nm CPU shrink came but probably not.

As for the 540, a slimmer 360 never hurt anybody.
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6808|byah

rammunition wrote:

Not another f**king version of the 360
Agreed. Microsoft has yet to get their consoles right. Its a desperation thing.
motherdear
Member
+25|6920|Denmark/Minnesota (depends)
it seems like the 65nm would be more expensive to produce though than a 90 nm since the technologi is more advance (i'm no expert but it seems logical to assume so) and they can't differenciate between old and new 360 consoles unless they want an uproar from xbox gamers. really i have no idea why they are producing these machines when they don't have bluray in them yet seems like a very bad thing for businiess and maintainance of the machines.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6806|Long Island, New York

The#1Spot wrote:

rammunition wrote:

Not another f**king version of the 360
Agreed. Microsoft has yet to get their consoles right. Its a desperation thing.
Must explain their sales.
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6986|Riva, MD

motherdear wrote:

it seems like the 65nm would be more expensive to produce though than a 90 nm since the technologi is more advance (i'm no expert but it seems logical to assume so) and they can't differenciate between old and new 360 consoles unless they want an uproar from xbox gamers. really i have no idea why they are producing these machines when they don't have bluray in them yet seems like a very bad thing for businiess and maintainance of the machines.
That's why they waited until it was more mainstream.  For CPUs, it became that way quickly.  For GPUs, evidently it's now.

Blu-ray REALLY isn't that important, and if they do release it, it won't be integrated.  People keep thinking that but it doesn't make any sense because the console already has all of it's standard disc features inside it, people would be pissed if they HAD to upgrade to Blu-ray to play newer games unless it was an entirely new console.  If MS does make anything Blu-ray related for this generation of XBox, it will be an external attachment, just like it was for the HD DVD.

You wouldn't even be thinking about integrated Blu-ray anyway if they hadn't put it in the PS3 so stop saying it should be the standard for the 360, because this is a different console.  The PS3 was released after the other consoles by a while so it has the technological upper hand, that doesn't mean other consoles should have to upgrade to keep up.

Last edited by _j5689_ (2008-07-10 08:37:47)

The#1Spot
Member
+105|6808|byah

Poseidon wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

rammunition wrote:

Not another f**king version of the 360
Agreed. Microsoft has yet to get their consoles right. Its a desperation thing.
Must explain their sales.
The 360 has always been cheaper. People think cheaper is better. What is not shown is the repair costs for faulty hardware.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6818|UK

_j5689_ wrote:

The PS3 was released ahead of the other consoles by a while so it has the technological upper hand, that doesn't mean other consoles should have to upgrade to keep up.
Unless I am reading that wrong, are you saying the PS3 came out before the other consoles?

_j5689_ wrote:

The PS3 was released ahead of the other consoles by a while...
?

Martyn
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6806|Long Island, New York

The#1Spot wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:


Agreed. Microsoft has yet to get their consoles right. Its a desperation thing.
Must explain their sales.
The 360 has always been cheaper. People think cheaper is better. What is not shown is the repair costs for faulty hardware.
Uh, not really? For most people in the end it ends up costing more than the PS3 because of XBL Gold and the wireless adapter (for which I have both).

Plus, lol? I hope you're talking about MS paying the repair costs, because it costs nothing to people to get their 360 fixed if it RRoD's.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,054|7040|PNW

That's good timing, because I plan to grab an XBox 360 when Fable 2 comes out.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6890|London, England

_j5689_ wrote:

motherdear wrote:

it seems like the 65nm would be more expensive to produce though than a 90 nm since the technologi is more advance (i'm no expert but it seems logical to assume so) and they can't differenciate between old and new 360 consoles unless they want an uproar from xbox gamers. really i have no idea why they are producing these machines when they don't have bluray in them yet seems like a very bad thing for businiess and maintainance of the machines.
That's why they waited until it was more mainstream.  For CPUs, it became that way quickly.  For GPUs, evidently it's now.

Blu-ray REALLY isn't that important, and if they do release it, it won't be integrated.  People keep thinking that but it doesn't make any sense because the console already has all of it's standard disc features inside it, people would be pissed if they HAD to upgrade to Blu-ray to play newer games unless it was an entirely new console.  If MS does make anything Blu-ray related for this generation of XBox, it will be an external attachment, just like it was for the HD DVD.

You wouldn't even be thinking about integrated Blu-ray anyway if they hadn't put it in the PS3 so stop saying it should be the standard for the 360, because this is a different console.  The PS3 was released ahead of the other consoles by a while so it has the technological upper hand, that doesn't mean other consoles should have to upgrade to keep up.
If HD-DVD or Blu-Ray was standard on the 360 in the beginning, multiplatform games (aka most games) would be much better. Example would be GTA 4, where they've already complained about DVD9 size. Also I reckon if the 360 came with built in HD-DVD, then HD-DVD would've won the "format war" easily.

It probably boiled down to cost. They wanted to keep it as low as possible. I still don't think it was a smart move though, maybe the consumer wins on cost but the industry loses out overall.

If this Xbox 520 is quite cheap, I might get one. Although there aren't many Xbox exclusives at the moment that I'm interested in. Alot of them seem to be fantasy/sci-fi games.

Last edited by Mek-Stizzle (2008-07-10 07:38:18)

_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6986|Riva, MD

Bell wrote:

_j5689_ wrote:

The PS3 was released ahead of the other consoles by a while so it has the technological upper hand, that doesn't mean other consoles should have to upgrade to keep up.
Unless I am reading that wrong, are you saying the PS3 came out before the other consoles?

_j5689_ wrote:

The PS3 was released ahead of the other consoles by a while...
?

Martyn
No, I meant it came after.
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6986|Riva, MD

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

That's good timing, because I plan to grab an XBox 360 when Fable 2 comes out.
Good god, that's still not out yet?  Better be like way better than the first one.
Nappy
Apprentice
+151|6498|NSW, Australia

The#1Spot wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:


Agreed. Microsoft has yet to get their consoles right. Its a desperation thing.
Must explain their sales.
The 360 has always been cheaper. People think cheaper is better. What is not shown is the repair costs for faulty hardware.
+ there is a lot of idiots who know nothing about anything and buy them
+ fanboys

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard