Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7187|UK
I agree that its absurd to make people vote again just because it doesn't go your way. But then again from everything Ive heard no one voted for because they had no idea what it was really for.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6711|Éire

Vilham wrote:

I agree that its absurd to make people vote again just because it doesn't go your way. But then again from everything Ive heard no one voted for because they had no idea what it was really for.
It reminds of someone playing paper, scissor, stone... "best two out of three"!
JahManRed
wank
+646|7049|IRELAND

Democracy ftw.

Interesting comparison.

What part of no do the frogs not understand. I bet you if the French actually did the democratic thing and allowed their own ppl to vote on it they would say no too.

I'll say it again. There is a bigger world wide addenda at stake here and the vote will some how go yes sooner or later. And that will be the death of the Democratic EU. Politicians doing what they want against the will of the people. Mugabby would be proud.
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7187|UK
It think a better analogy might be more of a case of rock paper scissor when one person has no idea how to play and they have a practice round first.

The problem being is that isn't how politics should work, if the people say no, it means no.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6711|Éire

Vilham wrote:

It think a better analogy might be more of a case of rock paper scissor when one person has no idea how to play and they have a practice round first.

The problem being is that isn't how politics should work, if the people say no, it means no.
Many people didn't understand but many people also had a fairly good understanding and just felt the Government weren't coming clean on the reality of many segments of the treaty. They only dedicated 3 weeks to the official Yes campaign.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7049|IRELAND

Braddock wrote:

Vilham wrote:

It think a better analogy might be more of a case of rock paper scissor when one person has no idea how to play and they have a practice round first.

The problem being is that isn't how politics should work, if the people say no, it means no.
Many people didn't understand but many people also had a fairly good understanding and just felt the Government weren't coming clean on the reality of many segments of the treaty. They only dedicated 3 weeks to the official Yes campaign.
If they had interpreted the content in lay mans terms the people would have understood it. The fact they didn't says they didn't want the people to understand it. Says it all and a good enough reason to vote no for most ppl.
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|7177|Scotland

They should have agreed with it. Ireland would be fuck all without the funding of the EU... and then they say NO to a perfectly good treaty? Stupid stupid stupid. The EU should just cut funding.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6711|Éire

Zimmer wrote:

They should have agreed with it. Ireland would be fuck all without the funding of the EU... and then they say NO to a perfectly good treaty? Stupid stupid stupid. The EU should just cut funding.
It is true that Ireland has done well within the EU but to say we would be "fuck all" without them is a bit of a stretch. A large part of the Irish economic success has been thanks to low corporate taxes on companies seeking to set up in Ireland - a thing many people worried might be at risk if the treaty were ratified.

I also wouldn't describe the treaty as being "perfectly good" either, there are many, many issues covered in it - some good and some bad.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7049|IRELAND

Zimmer wrote:

They should have agreed with it. Ireland would be fuck all without the funding of the EU... and then they say NO to a perfectly good treaty? Stupid stupid stupid. The EU should just cut funding.
Ireland got a helping hand yes. And now we are giving other countries a hand up too with our contributions.Its how the EU works and is its founding principle. To get the whole of the EU up to the same financial levels to allow a smooth amalgamation.
Perfectly good treaty? Did you read it? Do you know that every country that has given its citizens the vote on it have rejected it? Cut funding? What funding, it ended years ago. Do you believe that democracy involved just nodding your head while a few politicians with their own addenda write the rules with no checks or recourse from the citizens who bear the brunt of the amalgamation of Europe?
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6527|eXtreme to the maX
European democracy certainly sucks these days.
There is an uberclass of fuckwits who think they have some right to rule the rest.
Fuck Israel
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6976

Zimmer wrote:

They should have agreed with it. Ireland would be fuck all without the funding of the EU... and then they say NO to a perfectly good treaty? Stupid stupid stupid. The EU should just cut funding.
Zimmer - Ireland is a net contributor to the EU. Are you suggesting that the principle of unanimity - enshrined in EU legislation - be violated? Such a move would eventually bite your own UK in the ass as it ultimately finds itself caught in the second tier of a two tier Europe.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-07-16 07:18:58)

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7042|London, England
I think it's time we invade France, we're all long overdue anyway.
d4rkst4r
biggie smalls
+72|6874|Ontario, Canada
Ireland's got to do the same thing again, reject the Treaty again and again until the EU gets the message.
"you know life is what we make it, and a chance is like a picture, it'd be nice if you just take it"
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7042|London, England

d4rkst4r wrote:

Ireland's got to do the same thing again, reject the Treaty again and again until the EU gets the message.
This is what happened last time. I forgot what country it was last time (was it Ireland back then too?), basically they rejected it the first time. Then they did it again and it won.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6764|tropical regions of london
I like being right
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6711|Éire

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

d4rkst4r wrote:

Ireland's got to do the same thing again, reject the Treaty again and again until the EU gets the message.
This is what happened last time. I forgot what country it was last time (was it Ireland back then too?), basically they rejected it the first time. Then they did it again and it won.
We had a similar case with the Nice treaty yes.
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6745|New Haven, CT
Wow. And I thought it was nice to live in Europe.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6282
As much as like Mr Sarkozy he should just understand what the Irish want, they voted no he and others should move on.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6644|Escea

I still have no idea what this Lisbon treaty is all about
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7187|UK
Tbh I agree with Mek, we need another war that involves the French getting owned like normal.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6282

M.O.A.B wrote:

I still have no idea what this Lisbon treaty is all about
no one does tbh


this from wiki

"The Treaty of Lisbon (also known as the Reform Treaty) is a treaty designed to streamline the workings of the European Union (EU) with amendments to the Treaty on European Union (TEU, Maastricht) and the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC, Rome), the latter being renamed Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in the process. The stated aim of the treaty is "to complete the process started by the Treaty of Amsterdam and by the Treaty of Nice with a view to enhancing the efficiency and democratic legitimacy of the Union and to improving the coherence of its action"
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7187|Cambridge (UK)

Braddock wrote:

Nicolarse Sarkozy and Robert Nugabe...what's the difference?
Sarkozy is French.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6644|Escea

rammunition wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

I still have no idea what this Lisbon treaty is all about
no one does tbh


this from wiki

"The Treaty of Lisbon (also known as the Reform Treaty) is a treaty designed to streamline the workings of the European Union (EU) with amendments to the Treaty on European Union (TEU, Maastricht) and the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC, Rome), the latter being renamed Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in the process. The stated aim of the treaty is "to complete the process started by the Treaty of Amsterdam and by the Treaty of Nice with a view to enhancing the efficiency and democratic legitimacy of the Union and to improving the coherence of its action"
Sounds more like it was made up just give a load of different random treaty names out.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7042|London, England
They're trying to turn the EU into a United States (of Europe) - This treaty is a step in that direction.

No thanks. I don't think many Europeans want that. Except for rammunation, but rammunation likes everything bad, he is the epitome of evil

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard