menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|6909|Amsterdam‫
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/f1dl.jpg
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
kptk92
u
+972|6871|tc_london
Why is Coulthard's flag Scottish when Scotland is part of the United Kingdom O_O
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|6909|Amsterdam‫

kptk92 wrote:

Why is Coulthard's flag Scottish when Scotland is part of the United Kingdom O_O
don't know
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6956|N. Ireland

kptk92 wrote:

Why is Coulthard's flag Scottish when Scotland is part of the United Kingdom O_O
Because he's Scottish...
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7084|London, England

kylef wrote:

kptk92 wrote:

Why is Coulthard's flag Scottish when Scotland is part of the United Kingdom O_O
Because he's Scottish...
wat

Scottish = British = UK Flag

That's why Hamilton and Button have the UK flag and not the English flag. Because in F1 they represent the UK not just England, same goes for Coulthard, he represents the UK not Scotland. England, Scotland, N.Ireland and Wales aren't separate entities in F1 (or the Olympics, and some other stuff).
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7229|Cambridge (UK)

Nappy wrote:

it was good this year in the wet
What was? Monaco? Sorry, but I beg to differ - it was shit - but then I think Monaco is always shit - I hate street circuits - they're PUBLIC ROADS FFS! They're not designed to be race circuits - you never get any over taking, every one's ultra cautious 'cos they don't want to end up embeded in some concrete wall, in short, they're boring - doubly so in the wet.

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

kylef wrote:

kptk92 wrote:

Why is Coulthard's flag Scottish when Scotland is part of the United Kingdom O_O
Because he's Scottish...
wat

Scottish = British = UK Flag

That's why Hamilton and Button have the UK flag and not the English flag. Because in F1 they represent the UK not just England, same goes for Coulthard, he represents the UK not Scotland. England, Scotland, N.Ireland and Wales aren't separate entities in F1 (or the Olympics, and some other stuff).
Do you really care?

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2008-07-21 08:22:50)

Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6952|Gogledd Cymru

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Nappy wrote:

it was good this year in the wet
What was? Monaco? Sorry, but I beg to differ - it was shit - but then I think Monaco is always shit - I hate street circuits - they're PUBLIC ROADS FFS! They're not designed to be race circuits - you never get any over taking, every one's ultra cautious 'cos they don't want to end up embeded in some concrete wall, in short, they're boring - doubly so in the wet.
I think he means Hockenheim, I'm not sure if it was wet but the MotoGP at the Sachsenring was wet so Hockenheim was too probably because afterall, they're in the same country..

/waffle.
kptk92
u
+972|6871|tc_london
Lewis is just too fucking pr0 in the wet. And I can't recall any wet weather at the Hockenheimring
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7229|Cambridge (UK)

The Sheriff wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Nappy wrote:

it was good this year in the wet
What was? Monaco? Sorry, but I beg to differ - it was shit - but then I think Monaco is always shit - I hate street circuits - they're PUBLIC ROADS FFS! They're not designed to be race circuits - you never get any over taking, every one's ultra cautious 'cos they don't want to end up embeded in some concrete wall, in short, they're boring - doubly so in the wet.
I think he means Hockenheim, I'm not sure if it was wet but the MotoGP at the Sachsenring was wet so Hockenheim was too probably because afterall, they're in the same country..

/waffle.
Actually, Hockenheim was dry. It threatened rain, but never managed much more than that.

No, I think if you look at the context of his post in this thread, he was talking about Monaco - which was wet, and was carnage, I guess it could be seen as 'good' if you like to see thousands of pounds worth of carbon fibre being destroyed, but personally, I'd much rather see a close fought race with plenty of overtaking and for the majority of the field to finish the race unscathed.

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2008-07-21 08:30:19)

Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6952|Gogledd Cymru

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:


What was? Monaco? Sorry, but I beg to differ - it was shit - but then I think Monaco is always shit - I hate street circuits - they're PUBLIC ROADS FFS! They're not designed to be race circuits - you never get any over taking, every one's ultra cautious 'cos they don't want to end up embeded in some concrete wall, in short, they're boring - doubly so in the wet.
I think he means Hockenheim, I'm not sure if it was wet but the MotoGP at the Sachsenring was wet so Hockenheim was too probably because afterall, they're in the same country..

/waffle.
Actually, Hockenheim was dry. It threatened rain, but never managed much more than that.

No, I think if you look at the context of his post in this thread, he was talking about Monaco - which was wet, and was carnage, I guess it could be seen as 'good' if you like to see thousands of pounds worth of carbon fibre being destroyed, but personally, I'd much rather see a close fought race with plenty of overtaking and for the majority of the field to finish the race unscathed.
Watch MotoGP then, much better than this naff shite.
wensleydale8
Member
+81|7232|LEEDS!!!!!, Yorkshire
shame theyll never be blasting through the forest again
Dear God please let my karma one day reach 100, whether it be tomorrow or 1000 years in the future i want it to happen.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard