Then why don't they have them as two separate books instead of bound up together?You just can't seem to accept the fact that the NEW Covenant supersedes the Old Testament with the coming of Christ and his teachings.
Christians acknowledge the old testament but it WORSHIPS the word of the Christ. The are 2 different things Cam, or they wouldn't separate the books into 2 DISTINCT and separate sections.
Where did I say that everyone on the right is ignorant? Show me the word everyone pls.lowing wrote:
So I get it, I am generalizing by saying shit, I never said, like "All black people are lazy" and you are not gewneralizing by saying everyone on the right that does not believe what you believe is ignorant, prejudiced, or have an inferiority complex.........I see now.sergeriver wrote:
Nowhere I said it was. Nevertheless, he can back up his opinions with facts, which doesn't necessarily mean that those facts are representative of a whole community.Pug wrote:
Ok, I get it. But then this thread is not directed at Lowing...he usually backs up his opinions with facts, examples or conjecture that would hold up if this was a court room.
Correct?
Well if we are comparing church founders.lowing wrote:
So he said these things when? BEFORE or AFTER he lopped off those 600 heads?
He had 2 of his wives executed, had many mistresses and enjoyed gambling.wiki wrote:
Opposition to Henry's religious policies was quickly suppressed in England. A number of dissenting monks were tortured and executed.The most prominent resisters included John Fisher, Bishop of Rochester, and Sir Thomas More, Henry's former Lord Chancellor, both of whom refused to take the oath to the King and were subsequently convicted of high treason and beheaded at Tower Hill, just outside the Tower of London
