KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
konfusion wrote:
Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
I love reading through all the justifications people come up with for theft. 99% of the time it simply comes down to the fact that people do it because they can easily get away with it.
It's like when people who flee from a crime get caught. They cry and they beg for forgiveness, but the only thing they're sorry about is the fact that they got caught.
If some pop artist, whose producer churns out an album a day, expects his album to be bought - well, he can shove that album right back down into the dark hole it came from.
Piracy will slow as quality of music goes up. Nowadays you have too many
songs albums of really low quality.
-kon
So I take it you don't own many new albums, right? That ^^^ is just another excuse. A weak one too.
I used to tape songs off the radio. In a sense, that was piracy. I'd borrow albums and tape them to, or loan my albums so friends could tape them. It's what kids do. Sometimes I'd by an album, but only if I was a real fan of the group - then I had to have everything the group did!
These corporate jerks expect to be paid for every flash-in-the-pan hot-now 15-minutes of fame is over later potentially low or no talent bum - they pimp out. They want all music to cost money and to be owned by a corporation; it's an anti-human sentiment some rock stars have bought into (sold their soul for). As far as I am concerned - fuck no. Fans will pay. And, they (the groups and music moguls) should have to make it (money) the old fashioned way - playing gigs or by supporting their fan base. Often people wouldn't pay to have certain songs, but radio or the Internet just put what they wouldn't pay for - right in front of them.
People assume piracy reduces sales. But they fail to argue IMO, that people would pay for it, for sure, in the first place.
Last edited by topal63 (2008-07-25 17:21:17)