Funny how everyone automatically takes a different opinion as trolling
fail moar plox.
fail moar plox.
but peterson will still kick the shit out of every other RB except maybe LTusmarine wrote:
vikings = last place.N00bkilla55404 wrote:
Anyways, maybe the vikings would have been better, seeing as how their running game is already among the top and all they need is a good QB.
i will bet you a 3 day ban.
want the bet?Poseidon wrote:
but peterson will still kick the shit out of every other RB except maybe LTusmarine wrote:
vikings = last place.N00bkilla55404 wrote:
Anyways, maybe the vikings would have been better, seeing as how their running game is already among the top and all they need is a good QB.
i will bet you a 3 day ban.
actually yesusmarine wrote:
want the bet?Poseidon wrote:
but peterson will still kick the shit out of every other RB except maybe LTusmarine wrote:
vikings = last place.
i will bet you a 3 day ban.
296 yards in one game as a ROOKIE says you're on
who said you we're trolling because you had a different opinion? I said you were trolling when you sounded like an idiot and just wrote watN00bkilla55404 wrote:
Funny how everyone automatically takes a different opinion as trolling
fail moar plox.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
/threadPoseidon wrote:
actually yesusmarine wrote:
want the bet?Poseidon wrote:
but peterson will still kick the shit out of every other RB except maybe LT
296 yards in one game as a ROOKIE says you're on
very well. last place in the division. you will get the ban hammer sirPoseidon wrote:
actually yesusmarine wrote:
want the bet?Poseidon wrote:
but peterson will still kick the shit out of every other RB except maybe LT
296 yards in one game as a ROOKIE says you're on
if the lions have a better record than the vikings, no matter how bad they might be, i'll eat my shoeusmarine wrote:
very well. last place in the division. you will get the ban hammer sirPoseidon wrote:
actually yesusmarine wrote:
want the bet?
296 yards in one game as a ROOKIE says you're on
this applies for BF2s though, not trackr
no no noPoseidon wrote:
this applies for BF2s though, not trackr
lel, since when were football teams 1 man strong? Personal performance means jack shit if the rest of them are chickens with their heads cut off, and seeing how this arguement is about an individual...usmarine wrote:
very well. last place in the division. you will get the ban hammer sirPoseidon wrote:
actually yesusmarine wrote:
want the bet?
296 yards in one game as a ROOKIE says you're on
get madden '09 this tuesday and a 360 so i can play you, bitchusmarine wrote:
no no noPoseidon wrote:
this applies for BF2s though, not trackr
i'll be the vikes
you can be the bengals
i'll beat you
wat? no sir. brownsPoseidon wrote:
you can be the bengals
peterson wasted LT i was there it was truly amazingPoseidon wrote:
but peterson will still kick the shit out of every other RB except maybe LTusmarine wrote:
vikings = last place.N00bkilla55404 wrote:
Anyways, maybe the vikings would have been better, seeing as how their running game is already among the top and all they need is a good QB.
i will bet you a 3 day ban.
It would have been much more fun if he came to Tampa considering who he would be playing ..lol.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
that's enough vikings hating from youusmarine wrote:
very well. last place in the division. you will get the ban hammer sirPoseidon wrote:
actually yesusmarine wrote:
want the bet?
296 yards in one game as a ROOKIE says you're on
lol brady quinnusmarine wrote:
wat? no sir. brownsPoseidon wrote:
you can be the bengals
lolbrownsPoseidon wrote:
lol brady quinnusmarine wrote:
wat? no sir. brownsPoseidon wrote:
you can be the bengals
& the jets trade to the vikes...
right...cowami wrote:
lolbrownsPoseidon wrote:
lol brady quinnusmarine wrote:
wat? no sir. browns
2007
Cleveland 10- 6
NY Jets 4 - 12
i win
right...usmarine wrote:
right...cowami wrote:
lolbrownsPoseidon wrote:
lol brady quinn
2007
Cleveland 10- 6
NY Jets 4 - 12
i win
2007
made the playoffs
NY Jets - no
Cleveland Browns - no
IT DON'T MATTAH IF YOU WIN LOSE BY 3,000 OR 1, YA STILL LOST
4-12 lulzPoseidon wrote:
IT DON'T MATTAH IF YOU WIN LOSE BY 3,000 OR 1, YA STILL LOST
Thank god, I wanted him out. He should have stayed retired, he lost most of my respect as a packer fan...
with chad pennington and kellen clemens at the reigns, that's actually goodusmarine wrote:
4-12 lulzPoseidon wrote:
IT DON'T MATTAH IF YOU WIN LOSE BY 3,000 OR 1, YA STILL LOST
also, for you non-believers:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingc … id=3522971
Lol, Brady Quinn wasn't their QB.Poseidon wrote:
lol brady quinnusmarine wrote:
wat? no sir. brownsPoseidon wrote:
you can be the bengals
...did I say he was?nukchebi0 wrote:
Lol, Brady Quinn wasn't their QB.Poseidon wrote:
lol brady quinnusmarine wrote:
wat? no sir. browns