Who cares what you saw at a movie shoot? Anything of real value has security to match. Super super spoilers and what Mary Hilton Aniston did last night don't count.Bertster7 wrote:
You see stuff of interest in many of the places. Especially at film studios, where they have very lax security, past the perimeter (where they certainly don't confiscate phones). The first time I went to Pinewood they were shooting for the Dark Knight, is that more the sort of thing you had in mind?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
What do those companies, especially the news ones, have to hide? The news companies operate on the bleeding edge, by the time you get anything useful it's outdated. What does a bank have to hide? They have a lot of money, and you know that's in a secure vault, and they have financial records, that is pure network security. I bet you didn't see anything of particular interest past the front desk either.Bertster7 wrote:
Meh. That's not true. I've done onsite work at enough different companies to know that. We have loads of big clients who have little to no security in place and the ones with security (like the BBC, News International and the AP - even the Bank of England didn't have security on the level some people in this thread have been talking about) have nothing once you're past the front desk.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- You can use a iPhone for alot more than calls....
So basically, only places that design stuff (not counting the sort of gay graphic design studios (where it's all about aesthetic design) and architects that I often have to visit for work).Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Who cares what you saw at a movie shoot? Anything of real value has security to match. Super super spoilers and what Mary Hilton Aniston did last night don't count.Bertster7 wrote:
You see stuff of interest in many of the places. Especially at film studios, where they have very lax security, past the perimeter (where they certainly don't confiscate phones). The first time I went to Pinewood they were shooting for the Dark Knight, is that more the sort of thing you had in mind?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
What do those companies, especially the news ones, have to hide? The news companies operate on the bleeding edge, by the time you get anything useful it's outdated. What does a bank have to hide? They have a lot of money, and you know that's in a secure vault, and they have financial records, that is pure network security. I bet you didn't see anything of particular interest past the front desk either.
But then why don't software studios have lots of security? Google and Adobe certainly don't, they're the only big ones I've been to.
The only commercial buildings I've ever been in that had seriously tight security were BAE and GSK (or whatever they call it these days, they've probably merged with someone else by now).
Google has little reason to hide what they're developing, and if they do have big things in the works we obviously don't know about them.Bertster7 wrote:
So basically, only places that design stuff (not counting the sort of gay graphic design studios (where it's all about aesthetic design) and architects that I often have to visit for work).Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Who cares what you saw at a movie shoot? Anything of real value has security to match. Super super spoilers and what Mary Hilton Aniston did last night don't count.Bertster7 wrote:
You see stuff of interest in many of the places. Especially at film studios, where they have very lax security, past the perimeter (where they certainly don't confiscate phones). The first time I went to Pinewood they were shooting for the Dark Knight, is that more the sort of thing you had in mind?
But then why don't software studios have lots of security? Google and Adobe certainly don't, they're the only big ones I've been to.
The only commercial buildings I've ever been in that had seriously tight security were BAE and GSK (or whatever they call it these days, they've probably merged with someone else by now).
Adobe clearly cares about security, I mean they get everyone to pay for photoshop.
You may mean that sarcastically, but yes, they do get most (Mac users, so not real people) people to pay for photoshop. Then they don't give them any proper tech support, hurray - more dull, dull work for me.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Adobe clearly cares about security, I mean they get everyone to pay for photoshop.
Adobe do a lot of proprietary software for companies. The sort of thing that should be very secure.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- You can use a iPhone for alot more than calls....