Congratulations.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.Poseidon wrote:
^^^ I think that's exactly what Docta was getting at.
Why, because your rig can't run it? I loved it. The MP is kinda shitty but the SP makes up for it. - PoseidonPoseidon wrote:
Congratulations.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.Poseidon wrote:
^^^ I think that's exactly what Docta was getting at.
Where exactly am I getting upset, Serge?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jokesergeriver wrote:
Why, because your rig can't run it? I loved it. The MP is kinda shitty but the SP makes up for it. - PoseidonPoseidon wrote:
Congratulations.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.
Where exactly am I getting upset, Serge?
It's more than obvious that you didn't like my score. If it comes to graphics it deserves 10, but a game is judged based on a lot of things and this game is a piece of shit.
funny thing is G-Phoria didn't even give it best graphics.sergeriver wrote:
Why, because your rig can't run it? I loved it. The MP is kinda shitty but the SP makes up for it. - PoseidonPoseidon wrote:
Congratulations.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.
Where exactly am I getting upset, Serge?
It's more than obvious that you didn't like my score. If it comes to graphics it deserves 10, but a game is judged based on a lot of things and this game is a piece of shit.
I trust better any of the guys posting here than any gaming site/show/magazine, except for Poseidon. j/kMiggle wrote:
funny thing is G-Phoria didn't even give it best graphics.sergeriver wrote:
Why, because your rig can't run it? I loved it. The MP is kinda shitty but the SP makes up for it. - PoseidonPoseidon wrote:
Congratulations.
Where exactly am I getting upset, Serge?
It's more than obvious that you didn't like my score. If it comes to graphics it deserves 10, but a game is judged based on a lot of things and this game is a piece of shit.
Further proof that G4 is a complete joke.
Somebody revoke this man's posting rights.SamTheMan:D wrote:
portal - 2
Last edited by MadKatter (2008-08-20 13:43:06)
ban?MadKatter wrote:
Die.SamTheMan:D wrote:
portal - 2
That's why as I said above, if the number of reviews per game is lower than another games you shouldn't value the score as highly. Its up to people to decide if they think a game score based on one person is valid or not. I personally wouldn't and I think most other people wouldn't either.Poseidon wrote:
And that's why "reviews" shouldn't be based on one person.Miggle wrote:
In Vilham's opinion it does.Poseidon wrote:
Exactly. I don't care how bad you hate Bioshock, it doesn't fucking deserve to be on the bottom of the list.
Hell, actually, Vilham gave a fair score. A 6 for a game he doesn't really like is pretty fair.
Last edited by Vilham (2008-08-20 14:16:32)
But you gave it a one. That kind of extremely low scores ought to be reserved for games that are not just unfun, but unplayable. Games that don't work in concept or theory. Ones that are riddled with bugs, have more controls and are generally unplayable. If you don't like Crysis then give it a 5, saying that it didn't do anything extraordinary but it was possible to actually play it.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.Poseidon wrote:
^^^ I think that's exactly what Docta was getting at.
Yeah Crysis maybe an incredibly mediocre game with the only great thing being its graphics but it's not shit awful, anything below 5 literally has to be bollocks, I know that 5 should be average but for a game to get 5 it has to piss you off more than it entertains, and I rarely find games that bad.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
But you gave it a one. That kind of extremely low scores ought to be reserved for games that are not just unfun, but unplayable. Games that don't work in concept or theory. Ones that are riddled with bugs, have more controls and are generally unplayable. If you don't like Crysis then give it a 5, saying that it didn't do anything extraordinary but it was possible to actually play it.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.Poseidon wrote:
^^^ I think that's exactly what Docta was getting at.
I gave it a 2 because despite the amazing graphics, the game is a resources eating machine, the SP story is stupid and incredibly boring and the MP is awful. I don't want a piece of art, I want a game.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
But you gave it a one. That kind of extremely low scores ought to be reserved for games that are not just unfun, but unplayable. Games that don't work in concept or theory. Ones that are riddled with bugs, have more controls and are generally unplayable. If you don't like Crysis then give it a 5, saying that it didn't do anything extraordinary but it was possible to actually play it.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.Poseidon wrote:
^^^ I think that's exactly what Docta was getting at.
Crysis pisses me off a lot. When you have great expectations about a game and once it's been released you find a boring and stupid game then the score goes through the toilet.Vilham wrote:
Yeah Crysis maybe an incredibly mediocre game with the only great thing being its graphics but it's not shit awful, anything below 5 literally has to be bollocks, I know that 5 should be average but for a game to get 5 it has to piss you off more than it entertains, and I rarely find games that bad.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
But you gave it a one. That kind of extremely low scores ought to be reserved for games that are not just unfun, but unplayable. Games that don't work in concept or theory. Ones that are riddled with bugs, have more controls and are generally unplayable. If you don't like Crysis then give it a 5, saying that it didn't do anything extraordinary but it was possible to actually play it.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know why you get all upset coz one guy thinks Crysis sucks. The game looks incredible, but it's boring to hell. The story is crap in SP and the MP sucks big time.
So you rated it ridiculously low because you thought it would be better? If a Sandwich doesn't taste as good as I hoped does that make it any less a sandwich? No. Same thing with games.sergeriver wrote:
Crysis pisses me off a lot. When you have great expectations about a game and once it's been released you find a boring and stupid game then the score goes through the toilet.Vilham wrote:
Yeah Crysis maybe an incredibly mediocre game with the only great thing being its graphics but it's not shit awful, anything below 5 literally has to be bollocks, I know that 5 should be average but for a game to get 5 it has to piss you off more than it entertains, and I rarely find games that bad.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
But you gave it a one. That kind of extremely low scores ought to be reserved for games that are not just unfun, but unplayable. Games that don't work in concept or theory. Ones that are riddled with bugs, have more controls and are generally unplayable. If you don't like Crysis then give it a 5, saying that it didn't do anything extraordinary but it was possible to actually play it.
that was a fucking awesome analogy, DoctaDoctaStrangelove wrote:
So you rated it ridiculously low because you thought it would be better? If a Sandwich doesn't taste as good as I hoped does that make it any less a sandwich? No. Same thing with games.sergeriver wrote:
Crysis pisses me off a lot. When you have great expectations about a game and once it's been released you find a boring and stupid game then the score goes through the toilet.Vilham wrote:
Yeah Crysis maybe an incredibly mediocre game with the only great thing being its graphics but it's not shit awful, anything below 5 literally has to be bollocks, I know that 5 should be average but for a game to get 5 it has to piss you off more than it entertains, and I rarely find games that bad.
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-08-20 18:38:26)
I didn't see you bitching about people giving below 5 to BF:BC. Check the scores they gave to it.Poseidon wrote:
that was a fucking awesome analogy, DoctaDoctaStrangelove wrote:
So you rated it ridiculously low because you thought it would be better? If a Sandwich doesn't taste as good as I hoped does that make it any less a sandwich? No. Same thing with games.sergeriver wrote:
Crysis pisses me off a lot. When you have great expectations about a game and once it's been released you find a boring and stupid game then the score goes through the toilet.
well done
:S
But yeah, no game deserves anything below a 5 or 6 unless it is TRULY terrible. Like, I dunno...Big Rigs: Off The Road racing.
THAT deserves a 1. CoD4 a 1? Yeah, right. Crysis a 2? Gimme a break.
Because fuck man, the people who gave the low scores were Sam and Miggle.sergeriver wrote:
I didn't see you bitching about people giving below 5 to BF:BC. Check the scores they gave to it.Poseidon wrote:
that was a fucking awesome analogy, DoctaDoctaStrangelove wrote:
So you rated it ridiculously low because you thought it would be better? If a Sandwich doesn't taste as good as I hoped does that make it any less a sandwich? No. Same thing with games.
well done
:S
But yeah, no game deserves anything below a 5 or 6 unless it is TRULY terrible. Like, I dunno...Big Rigs: Off The Road racing.
THAT deserves a 1. CoD4 a 1? Yeah, right. Crysis a 2? Gimme a break.
Ok, maybe I went too far giving a 2 to Crysis. You both are right. I am wrong. It really doesn't deserve such a low score. I will give it a 6 only for the graphics. It just was so disappointing playing the game, but you are right.no game deserves a 1 or 2 unless they are really crappy.Poseidon wrote:
Because fuck man, the people who gave the low scores were Sam and Miggle.sergeriver wrote:
I didn't see you bitching about people giving below 5 to BF:BC. Check the scores they gave to it.Poseidon wrote:
that was a fucking awesome analogy, Docta
well done
:S
But yeah, no game deserves anything below a 5 or 6 unless it is TRULY terrible. Like, I dunno...Big Rigs: Off The Road racing.
THAT deserves a 1. CoD4 a 1? Yeah, right. Crysis a 2? Gimme a break.
Sam is...well, Sam is Sam...
And Miggle hates console FPS's (no matter what they are) so I can't really argue with him.