topthrill05
Member
+125|6998|Rochester NY USA
http://www.newsweek.com/id/154394

They can get away with not telling anyone what the fluid is made from? Leave it to a Haliburton employee to compare this to soda.

Unreal.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6706
Money >> People unfortunately.
imortal
Member
+240|7085|Austin, TX

topthrill05 wrote:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/154394

They can get away with not telling anyone what the fluid is made from? Leave it to a Haliburton employee to compare this to soda.

Unreal.
Leave it to Haliburton???  Huh?  The company involved was BP. As in "British Petrolium."

***EDIT***
Okay, I had to read it three times to track down the single sentance involved in your post.  First, would you have preffered he compared it to "The Colonel's secret recipe?"  He was trying to draw an analogy to being asked to reveal propriatary information.  And it isn't even his chemical; he was being asked on behalf of the industry.  It could just as easily been someone from Exxon. 

I think you people have Halliburton on the brain.

Last edited by imortal (2008-08-21 05:24:16)

imortal
Member
+240|7085|Austin, TX
Did anyone else notice that, after the first paragraph, they did not even mention the man who originally came in with the problem and supposedly contaminated this nurse?  Did he suffer the same effects?  If not, then you can rule out the chemical he was contaminated with.  That would make this pretty much a non-story.

You would think they would not leave out something like that by accident.
topthrill05
Member
+125|6998|Rochester NY USA
Lol Haliburton really has nothing to do with this. More of a joke late at night.

Although the point stands that what these fluids are made from should be disclosed.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard