blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|6913
The pair of 45nm Intel chips that Sun oh-so-kindly leaked last month just got all official-like.

Dunnington is "the first IA (Intel Architecture) processor with 6-cores, is based on the 45nm high-k process technology, and has large shared caches.t's also got an 8MB level-3 cache, Quickpath interconnects (up to 25.6GB per second), integrated memory controller (AMD what?) and supports up to DDR3-1333 memory, plus a bunch of other hardcore geek stuff, which you can scope out at Intel.

each pair of Penryn cores shares 3MBs of Level 2 cache, and each of the six cores can access 16MBs of Level 3 cache. That's a ton of space to store frequently used instructions, which could be a help for the chip in avoiding the front-side bus bottleneck to the main memory that's still apparently in the works for Dunnington.


https://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/7356_large_intel_dunnington.png


http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9878131-37.html
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6805|Long Island, New York
hawt
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6975|67.222.138.85
Processing technology is getting too far ahead of consumer software. They need to be making the same jumps in graphics cards.
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6229|Washington DC

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Processing technology is getting too far ahead of consumer software. They need to be making the same jumps in graphics cards.
How about not making this shit cost a god damned arm and a god damned leg... that ain't ill at all.
The_Sniper_NM
Official EVGA Fanboy
+94|6382|SC | USA |
Looks like its going to be Xeon only. Honestly when only a couple of games barely support quad cores, why is a 6-core needed? I see this only making it into the business market.

EDIT: This should be in Tech.

Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2008-03-30 18:05:21)

blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|6913
Intel's Dunnington is a world's first six-core CPU, and this monster with 16MB of cache will work at 2.66GHz. This will be the fastest iteration, while there will be 2.4GHz Xeons based on this six core design.

This CPU will use FSB1066 and it will officially be known as Xeon X7460; and there will be a 2.4GHz version branded as Xeon X7450 that will work at 2.4GHz and have 12MB of cache.The CPUs will be awfully expensive and we also heard it will need a new socket. It is still scheduled for Q3 2008 launch.

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?optio … p;Itemid=1

Last edited by blademaster (2008-08-21 15:50:38)

Brasso
member
+1,549|6898

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Processing technology is getting too far ahead of consumer software. They need to be making the same jumps in graphics cards.
wat?

Video cards are moving along at a perfect pace.  CPUs are going a bit too fast.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7111|Alberta, Canada

I give up in keeping up with technology. A year ago, my dual core was almost top of the line.
Should be in tech btw.

I didn't notice that this thread was 4 months old. I feel bad for necro poasting.

Last edited by Ryan (2008-08-21 16:43:48)

Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|6900

haffeysucks wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Processing technology is getting too far ahead of consumer software. They need to be making the same jumps in graphics cards.
wat?

Video cards are moving along at a perfect pace.  CPUs are going a bit too fast.
That was a 4 month old comment, maybe he changed his mind
Liberal-Sl@yer
Certified BF2S Asshole
+131|6724|The edge of sanity
How about they improve clock speed instead of throwing more cores on wafers? I mean why not use the advances in microscopic transistors to improve speed first then condense it for more cores?
Brasso
member
+1,549|6898

Gooners wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Processing technology is getting too far ahead of consumer software. They need to be making the same jumps in graphics cards.
wat?

Video cards are moving along at a perfect pace.  CPUs are going a bit too fast.
That was a 4 month old comment, maybe he changed his mind
holy shit, my bad
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6736
Redundant technology FTW!
GodFather
Blademaster's bottom bitch
+387|6487|Phoenix, AZ

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Processing technology is getting too far ahead of consumer software.
srsly
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6975|67.222.138.85
The price of decent graphics has come down significantly since that post I made. At the time it cost me $300 for an 8800GT.

moved to tech
i g
Banned
+876|6132|GA

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

$300 for an 8800GT.
wow
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6975|67.222.138.85

i g wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

$300 for an 8800GT.
wow
...what?
i g
Banned
+876|6132|GA

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

i g wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

$300 for an 8800GT.
wow
...what?
i payed 270 for my 8800gts over a year ago
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6975|67.222.138.85
Actually I was just assuming when I posted that it was around when I bought my card. I bought it for that much around 8 months ago.

Regardless, graphics cards haven't gotten to be really good value until ATi got competitive again fairly recently.
The_Sniper_NM
Official EVGA Fanboy
+94|6382|SC | USA |
GTS 512 launched with Crysis for $359. The deman was so high for GT's, they raised the price substantially.
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|6913

The_Sniper_NM wrote:

GTS 512 launched with Crysis for $359. The deman was so high for GT's, they raised the price substantially.
yeah wonder how this new six core is gonna stack up against the current quads that are on the market now
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6805|Long Island, New York
I don't like 6 core CPUs.

I'm very OCD when it comes to numbers. I like iterations of 4. 4, 8, etc.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6421|what

Poseidon wrote:

I don't like 6 core CPUs.

I'm very OCD when it comes to numbers. I like iterations of 4. 4, 8, etc.
Do you mean, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64?

sega master system 8 bit.

sega mega drive 16 bit.

sega saturn 32 bit.

nintendo 64 bit.

those were the days
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6805|Long Island, New York

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

I don't like 6 core CPUs.

I'm very OCD when it comes to numbers. I like iterations of 4. 4, 8, etc.
Do you mean, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64?

sega master system 8 bit.

sega mega drive 16 bit.

sega saturn 32 bit.

nintendo 64 bit.

those were the days
Nononono. 4. Not 2. (4, 8, 12, 16, 20), etc. Although yes, I'd prefer having something like "64 bit" to "30 bit" or something like that.

For example. I refuse to have 3gb of RAM in my system, but will gladly have 4. I'd refuse to have 7 gigs of RAM, but I'd gladly have 8.

It's just something about me. Dunno why.

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-08-21 19:45:37)

Ryan
Member
+1,230|7111|Alberta, Canada

Poseidon wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

I don't like 6 core CPUs.

I'm very OCD when it comes to numbers. I like iterations of 4. 4, 8, etc.
Do you mean, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64?

sega master system 8 bit.

sega mega drive 16 bit.

sega saturn 32 bit.

nintendo 64 bit.

those were the days
Nononono. 4. Not 2. (4, 8, 12, 16, 20), etc. Although yes, I'd prefer having something like "64 bit" to "30 bit" or something like that.

For example. I refuse to have 3gb of RAM in my system, but will gladly have 4. I'd refuse to have 7 gigs of RAM, but I'd gladly have 8.

It's just something about me. Dunno why.
God chose to make you special, that's all.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard