he raped him with a broom handle with a nail on the end with a pimps blood on it too
owned
Did Phelps really do that? Damn that man is awesome. The serb was probably bitching to him before the race.
Sgt.Davi wrote:
Did Phelps really do that? Damn that man is awesome. The serb was probably bitching to him before the race.
I think I've been had...
lewlSgt.Davi wrote:
I think I've been had...
I wish team events (and all the players on the team) would get gold medals that contributed to the medal count.
In that case, the US would probably be leading in terms of Gold after tomorrow...
In that case, the US would probably be leading in terms of Gold after tomorrow...
But that isn't the case, and you aren't first.Poseidon wrote:
I wish team events (and all the players on the team) would get gold medals that contributed to the medal count.
In that case, the US would probably be leading in terms of Gold after tomorrow...
Lol'd.
#rekt
essentially we are, because we don't need to use underage athletes or bribe judges to make the host country look goodMint Sauce wrote:
But that isn't the case, and you aren't first.Poseidon wrote:
I wish team events (and all the players on the team) would get gold medals that contributed to the medal count.
In that case, the US would probably be leading in terms of Gold after tomorrow...
Lol'd.
And why do underage athletes have any advantage whatsoever?Poseidon wrote:
essentially we are, because we don't need to use underage athletes or bribe judges to make the host country look goodMint Sauce wrote:
But that isn't the case, and you aren't first.Poseidon wrote:
I wish team events (and all the players on the team) would get gold medals that contributed to the medal count.
In that case, the US would probably be leading in terms of Gold after tomorrow...
Lol'd.
Proof of bribing judges?
Didn't think so.
yes because people purposely disadvantage themselves in order to win. lulzThe Sheriff wrote:
And why do underage athletes have any advantage whatsoever?
and the proof will come out. remember the russian judges? or was it french?
underage athletes in a gymnastics competition actually makes a huge difference
the proof is in the pudding
the proof is in the pudding
god damn why do all the UK fucks come out in mass when someone dare question the omgawesomechineseThe Sheriff wrote:
And why do underage athletes have any advantage whatsoever?Poseidon wrote:
essentially we are, because we don't need to use underage athletes or bribe judges to make the host country look goodMint Sauce wrote:
But that isn't the case, and you aren't first.
Lol'd.
Proof of bribing judges?
Didn't think so.
First off, being underage IS an advantage because of the smaller frame. It's fucking common knowledge and doesn't require thinking to know that being smaller and being younger/more versatile gives a large advantage over someone who's 20. Therefore, having a 14 year old who hasn't even hit puberty compete against (I think) 20 year old girl like Alicia Sacramone is NOT FAIR. And it's in general just BREAKING THE RULES.
And please, if you don't think the judges are biased towards China, you haven't been watching whatsoever.
K, what about them bars things, you need physical strength to be able to perform well on, and in gymnastics in general, little kids don't have the strength to do that.
And marine, that chinky gymnast that won on the uneven bars is 16 IIRC.
And marine, that chinky gymnast that won on the uneven bars is 16 IIRC.
Last edited by The Sheriff (2008-08-22 15:59:17)
they won the golds??????????????????????????????????????????? durThe Sheriff wrote:
I still need an answer.The Sheriff wrote:
And why do underage athletes have any advantage whatsoever?
It isn't a case of the UK at all. It was me and .Sup before, and he's Slovenian. You can swing it any you want to in order to feel like you're winning if it makes you feel good. But just don't expect people not to call you up on that bullshit.Poseidon wrote:
god damn why do all the UK fucks come out in mass when someone dare question the omgawesomechineseThe Sheriff wrote:
And why do underage athletes have any advantage whatsoever?Poseidon wrote:
essentially we are, because we don't need to use underage athletes or bribe judges to make the host country look good
Proof of bribing judges?
Didn't think so.
First off, being underage IS an advantage because of the smaller frame. It's fucking common knowledge and doesn't require thinking to know that being smaller and being younger/more versatile gives a large advantage over someone who's 20. Therefore, having a 14 year old who hasn't even hit puberty compete against (I think) 20 year old girl like Alicia Sacramone is NOT FAIR. And it's in general just BREAKING THE RULES.
And please, if you don't think the judges are biased towards China, you haven't been watching whatsoever.
THEY WON THE GOLD!!!!!!!!!!! And obviously it is an advantage or WHY WOULD YOU DO IT?Jenspm wrote:
We all The Americans need something to blame.The Sheriff wrote:
I still need an answer.The Sheriff wrote:
And why do underage athletes have any advantage whatsoever?
Someone needs to fucking slap you UK guys. I don't know what crawled up all your asses and died (I presume the a rat in the rat meat pile they use in the general tso's chicken) but it's not about our ego, it's not about us "winning" it's about fairness to athletes in GENERAL.jord wrote:
It isn't a case of the UK at all. It was me and .Sup before, and he's Slovenian. You can swing it any you want to in order to feel like you're winning if it makes you feel good. But just don't expect people not to call you up on that bullshit.Poseidon wrote:
god damn why do all the UK fucks come out in mass when someone dare question the omgawesomechineseThe Sheriff wrote:
And why do underage athletes have any advantage whatsoever?
Proof of bribing judges?
Didn't think so.
First off, being underage IS an advantage because of the smaller frame. It's fucking common knowledge and doesn't require thinking to know that being smaller and being younger/more versatile gives a large advantage over someone who's 20. Therefore, having a 14 year old who hasn't even hit puberty compete against (I think) 20 year old girl like Alicia Sacramone is NOT FAIR. And it's in general just BREAKING THE RULES.
And please, if you don't think the judges are biased towards China, you haven't been watching whatsoever.
And it's not just the US's athletes who have been fucked over because of He Kexin or whatever her name is. There's other athletes who could have had a chance and who are LEGALLY ELIGIBLE to compete who could have gotten the medal instead of the chinese. For example, that Romanian girl.
Holy fucking /facedesk.Jenspm wrote:
It's not not her age that's the advantage, it's her skill.usmarine wrote:
THEY WON THE GOLD!!!!!!!!!!! And obviously it is an advantage or WHY WOULD YOU DO IT?Jenspm wrote:
We all The Americans need something to blame.
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-08-22 16:00:54)
oh ok. then why is the age limit 16?Jenspm wrote:
It's not not her age that's the advantage, it's her skill.usmarine wrote:
THEY WON THE GOLD!!!!!!!!!!! And obviously it is an advantage or WHY WOULD YOU DO IT?Jenspm wrote:
We all The Americans need something to blame.
If it's an advantage to enter a 16 year old, why didn't the USA team do it then?usmarine wrote:
THEY WON THE GOLD!!!!!!!!!!! And obviously it is an advantage or WHY WOULD YOU DO IT?Jenspm wrote:
We all The Americans need something to blame.The Sheriff wrote:
I still need an answer.
they did.The Sheriff wrote:
If it's an advantage to enter a 16 year old, why didn't the USA team do it then?usmarine wrote:
THEY WON THE GOLD!!!!!!!!!!! And obviously it is an advantage or WHY WOULD YOU DO IT?Jenspm wrote:
We all The Americans need something to blame.