Looks pretty nice, and Dell always produce pretty solid panels.
OCuK are doing a great-quality 28" widescreen this week for only £250.00
OCuK are doing a great-quality 28" widescreen this week for only £250.00
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
370€ thats cheap! I paid 350€ for mine and friend got me a 70€ discount. I have a 24". GG ocUK.Uzique wrote:
Looks pretty nice, and Dell always produce pretty solid panels.
OCuK are doing a great-quality 28" widescreen this week for only £250.00
Dell Monitors are great, but after using mine for a LOOONG time (E193FP), it's starting to slowly crap out on me, image sometimes goes blurry (Re-adjusting fixes it) and got 2-3 stuck/dead pixels.
Can't go wrong with this monitor, really good price and sleek look to it!
Can't go wrong with this monitor, really good price and sleek look to it!
Last edited by alexbay13 (2008-08-04 09:46:13)
Try turning it off and then turning it back on.alexbay13 wrote:
Dell Monitors are great, but after using mine for a LOOONG time (E193FP), it's starting to slowly crap out on me, image sometimes goes blurry (Re-adjusting fixes it) and got 2-3 stuck/dead pixels.
Can't go wrong with this monitor, really good price and sleek look to it!
I prefer the look of the older monitors vastly to that, but that's a great price for a full HD 24" monitor! I've had my DELL Ultrasharp for over 2 years (under heavy use) and it hasn't lost a pixel ... that I know of
I got my 1920x1200 Packard Bell 24" for just under 400, 390, I think. Dad's got the reset, might check some time.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Reset? You mean receipt?Freezer7Pro wrote:
I got my 1920x1200 Packard Bell 24" for just under 400, 390, I think. Dad's got the reset, might check some time.
Its slang man.kylef wrote:
Reset? You mean receipt?Freezer7Pro wrote:
I got my 1920x1200 Packard Bell 24" for just under 400, 390, I think. Dad's got the reset, might check some time.
lal, reset.Sup wrote:
Its slang man.kylef wrote:
Reset? You mean receipt?Freezer7Pro wrote:
I got my 1920x1200 Packard Bell 24" for just under 400, 390, I think. Dad's got the reset, might check some time.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Versus this what's the difference? An HDMI slot?
and wtf 1920x1080?
1920x1200is better imo
and wtf 1920x1080?
1920x1200is better imo
Last edited by CommieChipmunk (2008-08-04 16:51:36)
.Sup wrote:
Try turning it off and then turning it back on.alexbay13 wrote:
Dell Monitors are great, but after using mine for a LOOONG time (E193FP), it's starting to slowly crap out on me, image sometimes goes blurry (Re-adjusting fixes it) and got 2-3 stuck/dead pixels.
Can't go wrong with this monitor, really good price and sleek look to it!
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
Price says $349.00 now. Cheap.
I must admit, I've yet to see a reason for using what is essentially a small TV as a monitor, especially with the sacrifices you make performance wise. I want new and awesome 20-22" displays, but it seems everything new and exciting is 24" nowadays.
ZOMG Cheap!
Careful. Cheap usually mean rubbish.Gooners wrote:
ZOMG Cheap!
Anyway, 16:9, what sort of mug buys a 16:9 monitor. 16:10 FTW.
Yeah I know, I always look at the specs first, that's why I have my 2253 SamsungBertster7 wrote:
Careful. Cheap usually mean rubbish.Gooners wrote:
ZOMG Cheap!
Anyway, 16:9, what sort of mug buys a 16:9 monitor. 16:10 FTW.
And Rampage formula-cos more expensive is better.Gooners wrote:
Yeah I know, I always look at the specs first, that's why I have my 2253 SamsungBertster7 wrote:
Careful. Cheap usually mean rubbish.Gooners wrote:
ZOMG Cheap!
Anyway, 16:9, what sort of mug buys a 16:9 monitor. 16:10 FTW.
Nice, I'm planning on buying a 30" monitor.
Meh, I just can't put up with the colours on TN panels. Especially now you get VA based panels with such great response times.Gooners wrote:
Yeah I know, I always look at the specs first, that's why I have my 2253 SamsungBertster7 wrote:
Careful. Cheap usually mean rubbish.Gooners wrote:
ZOMG Cheap!
Anyway, 16:9, what sort of mug buys a 16:9 monitor. 16:10 FTW.
Sweet jezuz!
What monitor are you currently running?Bertster7 wrote:
Meh, I just can't put up with the colours on TN panels. Especially now you get VA based panels with such great response times.Gooners wrote:
Yeah I know, I always look at the specs first, that's why I have my 2253 SamsungBertster7 wrote:
Careful. Cheap usually mean rubbish.
Anyway, 16:9, what sort of mug buys a 16:9 monitor. 16:10 FTW.