Pages: 1 2

 

2008-08-26 12:26:36
Brasso
member
+1,549|6898

ghettoperson wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

http://tweakers.net/ext/i/1219575587.jpg
the new nano
Looks like cardboard. Doesn't look very Apple either (AKA looks like absolute shit); I'm not convinced.
fixd

Last edited by haffeysucks (2008-08-26 12:26:53)

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
2008-08-26 12:29:37
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6917

haffeysucks wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

http://tweakers.net/ext/i/1219575587.jpg
the new nano
Looks like cardboard. Doesn't look very Apple either (AKA looks like absolute shit); I'm not convinced.
fixd
Heh. Depends on your opinion I guess. My point was more, they started long and thin, then made it short and fat (which looked fucking stupid IMHO) however more 'nano-esque'; why would they go back to long and thin? Clearly someone at Apple thought the short, fat one was an improvement.
2008-08-26 12:33:07
Brasso
member
+1,549|6898

ghettoperson wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:


Looks like cardboard. Doesn't look very Apple either (AKA looks like absolute shit); I'm not convinced.
fixd
Heh. Depends on your opinion I guess. My point was more, they started long and thin, then made it short and fat (which looked fucking stupid IMHO) however more 'nano-esque'; why would they go back to long and thin? Clearly someone at Apple thought the short, fat one was an improvement.
yeah i didn't like the short and fat one either
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
2008-08-26 13:15:58
Ecilop Murof
I HOP OUT DA BEEEED..
+167|6047|loves Stimey <3 |
Software update for the iPhone or a new iPhone?

 

Pages: 1 2

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard