Who's your Daddy

2008-09-01 10:52:19

#26

Sgt.Davi: Touches Himself At Night.; +300|7063|England

Uzique wrote:
Sgt.Davi wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/johnmccain/2662794/John-McCains-running-mate-Sarah-Palins-teenage-daughter-is-pregnant.html

This is not a repeat thread btw, this one confirms Bristol Palin is pregnant and not with the 5th child of Palin.

What a slag though
Oh not you too, you're English, have some decency .

Actually I feel stupid writing she's a slag, there are plenty of teenage girls who get knocked up and decide to keep the child. Just because shes the daughter of McCains running mate shouldn't make any difference.

Last edited by Sgt.Davi (2008-09-01 10:53:24)

2008-09-01 11:00:06

#27

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7091|UK

BUT it will.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2008-09-01 11:02:44

#28

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|7041|London, England

Sgt.Davi wrote:
Uzique wrote:
Sgt.Davi wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/johnmccain/2662794/John-McCains-running-mate-Sarah-Palins-teenage-daughter-is-pregnant.html

This is not a repeat thread btw, this one confirms Bristol Palin is pregnant and not with the 5th child of Palin.

What a slag though
Oh not you too, you're English, have some decency .
Actually I feel stupid writing she's a slag, there are plenty of teenage girls who get knocked up and decide to keep the child. Just because shes the daughter of McCains running mate shouldn't make any difference.

No she is a slag just like the other plenty teenage girls, oh well it's their life.

2008-09-01 11:12:36

#29

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|7069

Planning to marry the father? I bet she wasn't until she got knocked up. What a stupid idea, they'll be divorced within a year. You shouldn't marry someone just because you fucked up and didn't use a condom.

2008-09-01 11:18:38

#30

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6710|Éire

I don't know if this has been suggested already but could this be a risky but potentially ingenious move by the Republicans to pick a candidate with a pregnant teenage daughter to appeal to the feminist vote? If she comes out looking strong and supportive in light of the incident she could be hailed as a sort of feminist hero... it's as close as you'll get to a candidate who appeals directly to the single mother demographic.

I find it very hard to believe that her and her family weren't thoroughly vetted before being nominated as a VP candidate.

2008-09-01 11:19:29

#31

Sgt.Davi: Touches Himself At Night.; +300|7063|England

She was probably brought up thinking condoms are immoral and that abstinence is the best form of contraception....

Messed up on that front Sarah Palin did....

2008-09-01 11:19:30

#32

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6865|The Land of Scott Walker

m3thod wrote:
If premarital sex is considered a sin......then that would be a big deal would it not.

You can't just pick and choose how you wosrship our Lord and saviour.

Any sin is enough to separate us from God, hence the need for salvation. Having accepted salvation, you're correct, one should worship their Lord and Savior by living consistent to His teaching. What happens when we sin? Sol? Eternal condemnation? No, not for the Christian who has accepted salvation. If we continue in sin, that is a problem. However, if we confess and repent (meaning 'turn from') our sin, God promises forgiveness. Christianity isn't about humans being perfect.

2008-09-01 11:21:24

#33

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6710|Éire

ghettoperson wrote:
Planning to marry the father? I bet she wasn't until she got knocked up. What a stupid idea, they'll be divorced within a year. You shouldn't marry someone just because you fucked up and didn't use a condom.

I agree completely. In many cases such idiocy does more harm to the kids involved than just staying separated, growing up in a house where there is no love is often worse than growing up in a house where only one parent is present at any given time.

2008-09-01 11:21:37

#34

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6865|The Land of Scott Walker

Sgt.Davi wrote:
She was probably brought up thinking condoms are immoral and that abstinence is the best form of contraception....

Messed up on that front Sarah Palin did....

Read wiki, she's not Catholic ...

Braddock wrote:
... growing up in a house where there is no love is often worse than growing up in a house where only one parent is present at any given time.

How do you know there's no love?

The assumptions abound in this thread ...

Last edited by Stingray24 (2008-09-01 11:24:38)

2008-09-01 11:27:45

#35

Sgt.Davi: Touches Himself At Night.; +300|7063|England

If shes not Catholic what on earth compelled her not to use a condom?

Surely she wasn't planning this child at 17....

2008-09-01 11:29:38

#36

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6603|Ireland

I think the important thing that is being lost in all of this is that

Palin women put out big time!!!!!

This is the message they bring to the McCain ticket and it is a message that US politics have needed ever since Bill Clinton left the Whore House, um White House.

Last edited by Lotta_Drool (2008-09-01 11:34:51)

2008-09-01 11:31:07

#37

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6603|Ireland

Sgt.Davi wrote:
If shes not Catholic what on earth compelled her not to use a condom?

Surely she wasn't planning this child at 17....

Maybe she was raped by the dude, or they tried the Early Pull out technique like O'bama plans in Iraq.

Last edited by Lotta_Drool (2008-09-01 11:31:31)

2008-09-01 11:33:15

#38

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6603|Ireland

Home wrote:
So if those other threads about Trig are right, does that mean this would be Bristol's second kid?

No, Bristol only has the one that her Mom said was hers, this one is actually Bristol's younger sister's and she is just saying it is her's to cover for her sister.

Last edited by Lotta_Drool (2008-09-01 11:34:08)

2008-09-01 11:34:22

#39

Home: Section.80; +447|7267|Seattle, Washington, USA

Lotta_Drool wrote:
Home wrote:
So if those other threads about Trig are right, does that mean this would be Bristol's second kid?
No, Bristol only has the one that her Mom said was hers, this one is actually Bristol's younger sisters and she is just saying it is her to cover for her sister.

I deleted it because I hadn't actually read the story, I think I get it now.

2008-09-01 11:37:23

#40

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6949|Global Command

Wow.
This thread is something else.

2008-09-01 11:39:25

#41

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6710|Éire

Stingray24 wrote:
Braddock wrote:
... growing up in a house where there is no love is often worse than growing up in a house where only one parent is present at any given time.
How do you know there's no love?

The assumptions abound in this thread ...

I'm talking about a hypothetical home and you're questioning the veracity of it as though only your opinion has all the answers. I'm basing my opinion on people I know who have many issues as a result of growing up in homes where the parents have stayed together out of a sense of duty and not love for each other. Are you going to seriously argue that it is better in every single case to stay together and raise a child as a family unit when the parents don't love each other (and sometimes don't even like each other) rather than separate and share parenting in an environment where mutual hatred isn't constantly bubbling under the surface?

Because if you are then in my humble opinion you are not in touch with reality.

2008-09-01 11:39:28

#42

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|7069

Stingray24 wrote:
Sgt.Davi wrote:
She was probably brought up thinking condoms are immoral and that abstinence is the best form of contraception....

Messed up on that front Sarah Palin did....
Read wiki, she's not Catholic ...

Braddock wrote:
... growing up in a house where there is no love is often worse than growing up in a house where only one parent is present at any given time.
How do you know there's no love?

The assumptions abound in this thread ...

Were you ready to marry at 17? Because I don't know any (currently) married couples that have been together since they were 17. Of course they could love each other, but that doesn't mean they're ready to get married.

2008-09-01 11:39:39

#43

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|7127|67.222.138.85

Keep it on topic.

You guys need a different hobby or something...

2008-09-01 11:41:02

#44

jord: Member; +2,382|7098|The North, beyond the wall.

ghettoperson wrote:
Stingray24 wrote:
Sgt.Davi wrote:
She was probably brought up thinking condoms are immoral and that abstinence is the best form of contraception....

Messed up on that front Sarah Palin did....
Read wiki, she's not Catholic ...

Braddock wrote:
... growing up in a house where there is no love is often worse than growing up in a house where only one parent is present at any given time.
How do you know there's no love?

The assumptions abound in this thread ...
Were you ready to marry at 17? Because I don't know any (currently) married couples that have been together since they were 17. Of course they could love each other, but that doesn't mean they're ready to get married.

I knew someone who was engaged before she left school at 16. Ugly bitch.

2008-09-01 11:43:24

#45

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6603|Ireland

jord wrote:
Lotta_Drool wrote:
jord wrote:
I'd still do her.
what if the baby grabbed it while you were inside? I would wait a few months and then do her.
Few months it'll be like doing a Wizards sleeve. Or throwing a hot dog down a corridor...

September is the month.

No, them rich white chicks get C-sections nowdays so you don't have to worry about that shit. Hell, give her an afternoon after the surgury and it be like trying to put a hot dog through a keyhole.

2008-09-01 11:50:33

#46

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|7069

Lotta_Drool wrote:
jord wrote:
Lotta_Drool wrote:

what if the baby grabbed it while you were inside? I would wait a few months and then do her.
Few months it'll be like doing a Wizards sleeve. Or throwing a hot dog down a corridor...

September is the month.
No, them rich white chicks get C-sections nowdays so you don't have to worry about that shit. Hell, give her an afternoon after the surgury and it be like trying to put a hot dog through a keyhole.

Really? I'm surprised the Doc's will let you do that.

2008-09-01 11:54:40

#47

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6603|Ireland

ghettoperson wrote:
Lotta_Drool wrote:
jord wrote:

Few months it'll be like doing a Wizards sleeve. Or throwing a hot dog down a corridor...

September is the month.
No, them rich white chicks get C-sections nowdays so you don't have to worry about that shit. Hell, give her an afternoon after the surgury and it be like trying to put a hot dog through a keyhole.
Really? I'm surprised the Doc's will let you do that.

US doctors are awesome. Natural child birth is medevil.

2008-09-01 12:12:11

#48

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6865|The Land of Scott Walker

Braddock wrote:
Stingray24 wrote:
Braddock wrote:
... growing up in a house where there is no love is often worse than growing up in a house where only one parent is present at any given time.
How do you know there's no love?

The assumptions abound in this thread ...
I'm talking about a hypothetical home and you're questioning the veracity of it as though only your opinion has all the answers. I'm basing my opinion on people I know who have many issues as a result of growing up in homes where the parents have stayed together out of a sense of duty and not love for each other. Are you going to seriously argue that it is better in every single case to stay together and raise a child as a family unit when the parents don't love each other (and sometimes don't even like each other) rather than separate and share parenting in an environment where mutual hatred isn't constantly bubbling under the surface?

Because if you are then in my humble opinion you are not in touch with reality.

I thought you were referring to the non-hypothetical home of the expecting mother and her husband. Certainly every case is unique and some people are better separated than feuding together.

ghettoperson wrote:
Were you ready to marry at 17? Because I don't know any (currently) married couples that have been together since they were 17. Of course they could love each other, but that doesn't mean they're ready to get married.

No, I wasn’t ready. That reality helped me keep it in my pants until I was older and found a woman I truly loved. Listening to society, it wouldn't take much as a young couple to be convinced that they shouldn't even try to make it work because it would be too hard.

Last edited by Stingray24 (2008-09-01 12:12:54)

2008-09-01 12:20:18

#49

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6957|Long Island, New York

Assembly of God? Sounds like one of those radical Anti-Abortion groups who bomb clinics tbh.

2008-09-01 12:22:18

#50

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|7041|London, England

Imo, US sects of Christianity are pure evil. Kind of like what Pakistan has done to Islam

BF2S Forums Who's your Daddy

Uzique wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

m3thod wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

Home wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Home wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

Braddock wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

Braddock wrote:

jord wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

jord wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

jord wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

jord wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Board footer