I don't know, it's just pretty sad that every thread follows the same track. Oh well, maybe I need a break.usmarine wrote:
you expected something different?jord wrote:
Uh, same old shit, different thread.
nothing good about terrorismoug wrote:
I know about them. I asked YOU why YOU think they were bad.usmarine wrote:
read about itoug wrote:
and what was wrong with the weathermen exactly?
ill join ya.jord wrote:
Oh well, maybe I need a break.
meh, you said that a week ago as wellusmarine wrote:
ill join ya.jord wrote:
Oh well, maybe I need a break.
So when I draw your attention to examples of American terrorism, I'm wrong and a broken-record player, whilst your government's actions are completely excusable and defendable, right? Riiight. Might as well reloop back three pages to Braddock's point on double-standards employed by Americans concerning their government and elections.God Save the Queen wrote:
nothing good about terrorismoug wrote:
I know about them. I asked YOU why YOU think they were bad.usmarine wrote:
read about it
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
when have I ever even addressed you about "american terrorism"?Uzique wrote:
So when I draw your attention to examples of American terrorism, I'm wrong and a broken-record player, whilst your government's actions are completely excusable and defendable, right? Riiight. Might as well reloop back three pages to Braddock's point on double-standards employed by Americans concerning their government and elections.God Save the Queen wrote:
nothing good about terrorismoug wrote:
I know about them. I asked YOU why YOU think they were bad.
you should read your own posts sometimes and quit acting like this is the center for rhodes scholars
Uzique wrote:
I'm going to have to agree with this sentiment (although in less verbal terms ).God Save the Queen wrote:
DST fags take themselves too seriously "oh my god, youre not being serious...ban him!
Guys D&ST isn't some intellectual playground where the great philosophers and academics of BF2S cluster together to talk about high-brow topics. Most of the people that post here (including myself on certain topics; I am not exempt) are as biased as shit and don't deserve to "hand-pick" a community of like-minded individuals. It's almost as if this is an effort to create a 'debating utopia' where there is in fact no debate because all of the 'controversial' and challenging views are eliminated and outruled.
Keep the Forum open .
Last edited by God Save the Queen (2008-09-03 08:35:26)
no uJenspm wrote:
meh, you said that a week ago as wellusmarine wrote:
ill join ya.jord wrote:
Oh well, maybe I need a break.
You were right, the new PR is pretty slow. and nobody plays Basrah anymore.usmarine wrote:
ill join ya.jord wrote:
Oh well, maybe I need a break.
The internet, losing appeal one step at a time.
i would have just enjoyed the new maps with the same gameplay and choices as vanilla bf2 tbh. why cant they do that? i would play it all the time then.jord wrote:
You were right, the new PR is pretty slow. and nobody plays Basrah anymore.usmarine wrote:
ill join ya.jord wrote:
Oh well, maybe I need a break.
The internet, losing appeal one step at a time.
Last edited by usmarine (2008-09-03 08:36:51)
Well when you are done giving Braddock his foot massage and hand feeding him grapes take a look at your own double standards on how England has meddled in the rest of the worlds business for centuries.Uzique wrote:
So when I draw your attention to examples of American terrorism, I'm wrong and a broken-record player, whilst your government's actions are completely excusable and defendable, right? Riiight. Might as well reloop back three pages to Braddock's point on double-standards employed by Americans concerning their government and elections.God Save the Queen wrote:
nothing good about terrorismoug wrote:
I know about them. I asked YOU why YOU think they were bad.
Malloy must go
You mean custom maps? There's a few out there but I doubt they ever get played.usmarine wrote:
i would have just enjoyed the new maps with the same gameplay and choices as vanilla bf2 tbh. why cant they do that? i would play it all the time then.jord wrote:
You were right, the new PR is pretty slow. and nobody plays Basrah anymore.usmarine wrote:
ill join ya.
The internet, losing appeal one step at a time.
When's the next time you're playing?
no i mean the PR mod with vanilla gameplay.jord wrote:
You mean custom maps? There's a few out there but I doubt they ever get played.
When's the next time you're playing?
usmarine wrote:
lewl. thank for the insight. now, can we talk about the OP? my god. lets recap. we have cheney, bush, iraq, and now vietnam. you're right varegg, its me.CameronPoe wrote:
You could argue that John McCain was heavily involved in international terrorism: the Vietnam war - forcing your beliefs on an unwilling bunch of people that have little or no impact on you using the bullet and bomb...
usmarine wrote:
wow. just wow. and you dont have an agenda on these forums. nice try. leave now please. you are adding NOTHING to this discussion, no matter what varegg says.Uzique wrote:
It's kind of sad that you joke about the fact every single one of your Presidents has been a criminal
Holding a grudge are we now ?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Yeah I know, you mean the PR maps with normal gameplay. I don't know if anyone does that, there's barely 50 servers on normal pr, never mind normal gameplay with pr maps.usmarine wrote:
no i mean the PR mod with vanilla gameplay.jord wrote:
You mean custom maps? There's a few out there but I doubt they ever get played.
When's the next time you're playing?
They made the m14 shit anyway.
I cant even play regular bf2 decently
yesVaregg wrote:
usmarine wrote:
lewl. thank for the insight. now, can we talk about the OP? my god. lets recap. we have cheney, bush, iraq, and now vietnam. you're right varegg, its me.CameronPoe wrote:
You could argue that John McCain was heavily involved in international terrorism: the Vietnam war - forcing your beliefs on an unwilling bunch of people that have little or no impact on you using the bullet and bomb...usmarine wrote:
wow. just wow. and you dont have an agenda on these forums. nice try. leave now please. you are adding NOTHING to this discussion, no matter what varegg says.Uzique wrote:
It's kind of sad that you joke about the fact every single one of your Presidents has been a criminal
Holding a grudge are we now ?
Because ?usmarine wrote:
yesVaregg wrote:
usmarine wrote:
lewl. thank for the insight. now, can we talk about the OP? my god. lets recap. we have cheney, bush, iraq, and now vietnam. you're right varegg, its me.CameronPoe wrote:
You could argue that John McCain was heavily involved in international terrorism: the Vietnam war - forcing your beliefs on an unwilling bunch of people that have little or no impact on you using the bullet and bomb...usmarine wrote:
wow. just wow. and you dont have an agenda on these forums. nice try. leave now please. you are adding NOTHING to this discussion, no matter what varegg says.
Holding a grudge are we now ?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
nothing good about state terrorism eitherGod Save the Queen wrote:
nothing good about terrorismoug wrote:
I know about them. I asked YOU why YOU think they were bad.usmarine wrote:
read about it
but that's the only kind that's never criticized around here.
ƒ³
you banned me for no reason and now you are getting on my nerves.
Get one of your asskissers to follow you around with a medic bag.God Save the Queen wrote:
I cant even play regular bf2 decently
I was warned seriously for all of the posts that I made that overstepped the BF2s mark... he's impartial and fair.usmarine wrote:
you banned me for no reason and now you are getting on my nerves.
@ Deez: Our own history of terrorism and/or imperialism isn't really what I'm getting at, is it? My point was that you're making a huge deal out of terrorist associations in your electoral campaigns. Nobody here gets their panties in a twist because an MP or the PM have ties to terrorism or imperialism. In fact it's common knowledge that most of our 'right-wing' conservative party are just the relations of the old Toff imperialists; in terms of ideology anyway, and sometimes even in terms of lineage and family. Nobody makes breaking news out of such things like you do in the States. You act like the association is an outrage, here in the UK we just press on and deal with it.
@ GS: Rhodes scholars? There's a difference between wanting an intelligent discussion and talking about great intellectual or philosophical ideas. Just because I refuse to communicate in one-line grunts it doesn't mean I'm looking to engage with Leo Strauss or George Orwell.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
I never ban without there being a very good reason, nor does any other mod do so ... if you have a problem with my mod actions you are free to report me to any other mod or admin amongst the staff.usmarine wrote:
you banned me for no reason and now you are getting on my nerves.
And how am i getting on your nerves ? ... because i argue against what you believe in or because i'm a Euro and shouldn't have opinions on US related topics ?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
i didnt say that. but for election stuff, your opinions are, well usueless since you have no control over it.Varegg wrote:
shouldn't have opinions on US related topics ?
And you posting your opinions on a gaming Forum has a real effect?usmarine wrote:
i didnt say that. but for election stuff, your opinions are, well usueless since you have no control over it.Varegg wrote:
shouldn't have opinions on US related topics ?
Come on none of the speculation and discussion here actually has any real consequence or action. This is just a place for an international community to debate issues and enjoy some banter over key topics. I don't think anyone is coming to these Forums for genuine political information or guidance. I'd be very surprised if a Republican was persuaded to vote Democrat because of a thread on these Forums- or vice versa.
Everyone's opinion here on these Forums is "useless" in a real practical sense.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
not really. i agree what we talk about is useless, except for elections. that is something we americans can have control over so to speak.