BF2S Forums The richest man in the world.

"The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That Board administers the finance system by authority of a purely profiteering group. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money."
- Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr., 1923

US-Patent # 5.629.678

LOL

1▲     W., YiliYili W.     $100.0 gazillion ▲     ageless     Flag of the United States United States     Flag of the United States United States     Lemonade Stand     [1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_billionaires

ghettoperson wrote:

Uzique wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Very good question.

Because that's technically only his worth- there's no way he could get his hands on that amount of money. It's all tied up in the debt that will probably never be repaid in any large sum. I even doubt he recieves enough money to cover the annual interest . It's an unbelievably large amount of money that no person or state could produce for an individual's wealth.

So? All the richest people are only worth that. There's no way Bill Gates could get a hold of all his money.

Bill Gates does 'own' all of that money though, technically. It's just tied up in assets. Hypothetically he could sell up his stake in Microsoft tomorrow to the stock market or to a private investor and walk away very rich. With banking families such as the Rothschilds all their 'money' is tied up in debts and loans; liabilities and meaningless pieces of paper that loosely resemble some figure of money out there somewhere. He couldn't snap his fingers tomorrow and have $3 trillion dollars like next-week like Bill Gates (technically) could if he did so wish.

And damn ATG you've been on the New World Order / Illuminati bandwagon hardcore lately!

Last edited by Uzique (2008-09-06 15:05:25)

Uzique wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Because that's technically only his worth- there's no way he could get his hands on that amount of money. It's all tied up in the debt that will probably never be repaid in any large sum. I even doubt he recieves enough money to cover the annual interest . It's an unbelievably large amount of money that no person or state could produce for an individual's wealth.

So? All the richest people are only worth that. There's no way Bill Gates could get a hold of all his money.

Bill Gates does 'own' all of that money though, technically. It's just tied up in assets. Hypothetically he could sell up his stake in Microsoft tomorrow to the stock market or to a private investor and walk away very rich. With banking families such as the Rothschilds all their 'money' is tied up in debts and loans; liabilities and meaningless pieces of paper that loosely resemble some figure of money out there somewhere. He couldn't snap his fingers tomorrow and have $3 trillion dollars like next-week like Bill Gates (technically) could if he did so wish.

Why wouldn't debts and loans be counted towards their net worth? I mean, I know most people wouldn't be able to just pay them back like that, but that still doesn't mean that they can't be valued including that. Interestingly Wikipedia makes no estimates as to their net worth.

ghettoperson wrote:

ATG do you actually have a source for all that in the OP? I would be most interested to see it.

Wow dude, that's asking for a lot of info.

In a few sentences;

vast amounts of money was liberated by certain english army officers during the battle of watterloo. It was napoleans loot.

They used this to buy vast amounts of gold.
They loaned money to all sides during WW1

In 1916 they all met a a hunting club, the ten people there at that time controlled 1/6th of the worlds wealth.


Other than that, you have to understand these are old families who control governments. Not a lot is said about them and the actual numbers.

These are the people making profit off us debt at the federal reserve ( a privately held bank ).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschilds

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilateral_Commission

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America

Long and old movie.  if you have 3h30 to spare, it explain a lot of things.

Summary in 27 words please.

ghettoperson wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America

Long and old movie.  if you have 3h30 to spare, it explain a lot of things.

Summary in 27 words please.

In short it says that having a central bank is bad, the federal reserve is bad, international bankers start wars and give good points to prove it.

mikeyb118 wrote:

I smell Russian style nationalisation.

Russian style privatization in 90's was even worse.

m3thod wrote:

score 1 for the UK.  Bow down to our will yankee.

I'm owned by the bloody British.  fuck! y me.

SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:

Thanks ATG. You always open my eyes. I like to think I am well informed and then your posts make me feel like I walk in a haze.

A very scary thought.

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America

Long and old movie.  if you have 3h30 to spare, it explain a lot of things.

Summary in 27 words please.

In short it says that having a central bank is bad, the federal reserve is bad, international bankers start wars and give good many points to prove support it.

fixed