It's pretty awesome when you try to make an argument over everything I say, no matter how semantic it might be.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
lol?
It's pretty awesome when people make your argument for you.
All of you have betrayed our secret cause!
So I heard the pot thread got closed and this is still open...
Mad skillz.
Mad skillz.
WTF? cool kid label. You really are full of yourself sometime FM. I dont know how many times I stated my displeasure with fucking labels on this forum. Im sure somebody remembers. Please dont begin to lecture me on things that I have very well founded beliefs on. You are making some huge assumptions about the kind of person I am and the kind of thought process that I go through when deciding my positions over issues.
"until I prove that I see both sides on the vast majority of issues"
wow, again, making huge assumptions into what goes in my head. how is someone going to prove anything on an internet forum FM?
no one here wants the "cool kid" label, except maybe you.
"until I prove that I see both sides on the vast majority of issues"
wow, again, making huge assumptions into what goes in my head. how is someone going to prove anything on an internet forum FM?
no one here wants the "cool kid" label, except maybe you.
fucking cool kid label. gtfo with that shit.
I'm a blind patriot according to FM.God Save the Queen wrote:
WTF? cool kid label. You really are full of yourself sometime FM. I dont know how many times I stated my displeasure with fucking labels on this forum. Im sure somebody remembers. Please dont begin to lecture me on things that I have very well founded beliefs on. You are making some huge assumptions about the kind of person I am and the kind of thought process that I go through when deciding my positions over issues.
"until I prove that I see both sides on the vast majority of issues"
wow, again, making huge assumptions into what goes in my head. how is someone going to prove anything on an internet forum FM?
no one here wants the "cool kid" label, except maybe you.
How many rounds you got in that label gun, 200?
I'm listening to John Mellencamp right now
I must not be moderate because he's a liberal
I must not be moderate because he's a liberal
seems the olnly person worried about categorizing people into labels right here is FM.jord wrote:
I'm a blind patriot according to FM.God Save the Queen wrote:
WTF? cool kid label. You really are full of yourself sometime FM. I dont know how many times I stated my displeasure with fucking labels on this forum. Im sure somebody remembers. Please dont begin to lecture me on things that I have very well founded beliefs on. You are making some huge assumptions about the kind of person I am and the kind of thought process that I go through when deciding my positions over issues.
"until I prove that I see both sides on the vast majority of issues"
wow, again, making huge assumptions into what goes in my head. how is someone going to prove anything on an internet forum FM?
no one here wants the "cool kid" label, except maybe you.
How many rounds you got in that label gun, 200?
and right here you describe yourself in a way that is ten times better than a moderate could ever be - an independent. Think for your fucking self (not directed at you), but that doesn't mean taking the middle of the road on every issue like a personified Switzerland. There are SO many people that want to express their lofty morality by claiming to at the same time agree and disagree with both parties, by which they do nothing but acknowledge that those two parties hold the only valid opinions on the issues and that they don't have the balls to take a worthwhile stance. Don't lump yourself in with those twits.God Save the Queen wrote:
WTF? cool kid label. You really are full of yourself sometime FM. I dont know how many times I stated my displeasure with fucking labels on this forum. Im sure somebody remembers. Please dont begin to lecture me on things that I have very well founded beliefs on. You are making some huge assumptions about the kind of person I am and the kind of thought process that I go through when deciding my positions over issues.
noice contextGod Save the Queen wrote:
"until I prove that I see both sides on the vast majority of issues"
wow, again, making huge assumptions into what goes in my head. how is someone going to prove anything on an internet forum FM?
no one here wants the "cool kid" label, except maybe you.
"until you prove that you see both sides on the vast majority of issues and find the solution somewhere in the middle"
I don't want you to prove jack shit. If you find the solution to every problem is exactly in the middle, something is wrong.
I'm not sure where you got the idea I don't like you, but you sure seem to be going back to that a lot lately.jord wrote:
I'm a blind patriot according to FM.
How many rounds you got in that label gun, 200?
Ah, because people who are more biased in the political spectrum aren't really people at all, but the people who fall more in the middle such as yourself are much more intelligent, reasonable people.Poseidon wrote:
It's pretty awesome when you try to make an argument over everything I say, no matter how semantic it might be.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
lol?
It's pretty awesome when people make your argument for you.
Yes. Finally you understand.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Ah, because people who are more biased in the political spectrum aren't really people at all, but the people who fall more in the middle such as yourself are much more intelligent, reasonable people.
You are accepted into the Stonecutters.
I guess your definition of independent is my definition of moderate. When I think of the word independent, I think of the American Independent party. Those guys are far from independent. The are right wingers.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
and right here you describe yourself that is ten times better than a moderate could ever be - an independent. Think for your fucking self (not directed at you), but that doesn't mean taking the middle of the road on every issue like a personified Switzerland. There are SO many people that want to express their lofty morality by claiming to at the same time agree and disagree with both parties, by which they do nothing but acknowledge that those two parties hold the only valid opinions on the issues and that they don't have the balls to take a worthwhile stance. Don't lump yourself in with those twits.God Save the Queen wrote:
WTF? cool kid label. You really are full of yourself sometime FM. I dont know how many times I stated my displeasure with fucking labels on this forum. Im sure somebody remembers. Please dont begin to lecture me on things that I have very well founded beliefs on. You are making some huge assumptions about the kind of person I am and the kind of thought process that I go through when deciding my positions over issues.noice contextGod Save the Queen wrote:
"until I prove that I see both sides on the vast majority of issues"
wow, again, making huge assumptions into what goes in my head. how is someone going to prove anything on an internet forum FM?
no one here wants the "cool kid" label, except maybe you.
"until you prove that you see both sides on the vast majority of issues and find the solution somewhere in the middle"
I don't want you to prove jack shit. If you find the solution to every problem is exactly in the middle, something is wrong.I'm not sure where you got the idea I don't like you, but you sure seem to be going back to that a lot lately.jord wrote:
I'm a blind patriot according to FM.
How many rounds you got in that label gun, 200?Ah, because people who are more biased in the political spectrum aren't really people at all, but the people who fall more in the middle such as yourself are much more intelligent, reasonable people.Poseidon wrote:
It's pretty awesome when you try to make an argument over everything I say, no matter how semantic it might be.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
lol?
It's pretty awesome when people make your argument for you.
Going back to it a lot because I don't get why you said it, because of my avatar or what?
I have opinions that might be considered extreme by others and they contradict the platforms of many parties. Best example I could give are gun rights. I love guns and I am grateful for the fact that I am from a nation where they are allowed, but, the fact that so many people want to celebrate the right to take the life of another human being so adamantly bothers the shit out of me.
If Poseidon ever fell off his high horse he could set a free fall world record.
edit: and your latest post just exemplifies independence, not moderation. You hold a unique view that is not adequately represented by any mix of both parties.
So who is using labels now? I'm using the dictionary definitions of the words, and both according to that and according to the people I know who place themselves in that category, it's a profoundly dumb way to present yourself.God Save the Queen wrote:
I guess your definition of independent is my definition of moderate. When I think of the word independent, I think of the American Independent party. Those guys are far from independent. The are right wingers.
edit: and your latest post just exemplifies independence, not moderation. You hold a unique view that is not adequately represented by any mix of both parties.
I honestly don't know what post you're talking about. I need a little help here.jord wrote:
Going back to it a lot because I don't get why you said it, because of my avatar or what?
And the ironic statement of the year goes to...Flaming_Maniac wrote:
If Poseidon ever fell off his high horse he could set a free fall world record.
Yes, YOU!
Remind me again, who was the one dismissing people repeatedly for their widely popular political views?Poseidon wrote:
And the ironic statement of the year goes to...Flaming_Maniac wrote:
If Poseidon ever fell off his high horse he could set a free fall world record.
Yes, YOU!
its not a label as I see it but rather an association with the word.
Remind me again, who's been constantly criticized for being a pompous, condescending elitist? By other mods, at that?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Remind me again, who was the one dismissing people repeatedly for their widely popular political views?Poseidon wrote:
And the ironic statement of the year goes to...Flaming_Maniac wrote:
If Poseidon ever fell off his high horse he could set a free fall world record.
Yes, YOU!
Because I'm pretty sure it wasn't meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. I think you need to find a better definition of someone "being on their high horse", because that actually describes you to a tee, and it doesn't even relate to me.
I dismiss blind politics. That's all.
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-09-07 12:53:25)
then yeah of course we see it differently. Still, if we're on a public forum, applying personal connotations to words just leads to confusion.God Save the Queen wrote:
its not a label as I see it but rather an association with the word.
I check "decline to state" on my voter registration.
Last edited by God Save the Queen (2008-09-07 12:54:04)
hi, guise. I'm representative of a just right of center moderate conservative-white male(honky)-nonreligous type-Jeffersonian-oil loving-environmental(ist)-alternative fuel advocate-states rights kinda guy.
I hate label though.
I hate label though.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Well let's see the only mod I can think of that has said that is Kmarion, and I have said some pretty nasty things about him as well, but that doesn't seem to effect most opinions of him...? The rest of you apparently can't see the dripping sarcasm in a lot of my posts. I am anything but an elitist, but I make a post in good fun, people see the moderator tag, then jack off to the thought of telling someone they're power tripping on the internet.Poseidon wrote:
Remind me again, who's been constantly criticized for being a pompous, condescending elitist? By other mods, at that?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Remind me again, who was the one dismissing people repeatedly for their widely popular political views?Poseidon wrote:
And the ironic statement of the year goes to...
Yes, YOU!
Because I'm pretty sure it wasn't meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. I think you need to find a better definition of someone "being on their high horse", because that actually describes you to a tee, and it doesn't even relate to me.
I dismiss blind politics. That's all.
Of course you get to define blind politics, but that's cool right?
I call 'em as I see 'em.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Well let's see the only mod I can think of that has said that is Kmarion, and I have said some pretty nasty things about him as well, but that doesn't seem to effect most opinions of him...? The rest of you apparently can't see the dripping sarcasm in a lot of my posts. I am anything but an elitist, but I make a post in good fun, people see the moderator tag, then jack off to the thought of telling someone they're power tripping on the internet. OPoseidon wrote:
Remind me again, who's been constantly criticized for being a pompous, condescending elitist? By other mods, at that?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Remind me again, who was the one dismissing people repeatedly for their widely popular political views?
Because I'm pretty sure it wasn't meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. I think you need to find a better definition of someone "being on their high horse", because that actually describes you to a tee, and it doesn't even relate to me.
I dismiss blind politics. That's all.
Of course you get to define blind politics, but that's cool right?
"Anything but an elitist". I lol'd.
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-09-07 12:58:33)
I'm what would probably be described as a 'liberal'.
I don't hate America.
I hate war mongering American politicians, but I don't hate America.
I don't hate America.
I hate war mongering American politicians, but I don't hate America.
So do Americans and conservatives. I guess the difference is we also hate the terrorist..lol. (joke)Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I hate war mongering American politicians,
Xbone Stormsurgezz