BF2S Forums Goodbye Forever, my dearest BF2s (Hadron Collider)

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Canadianloser wrote:

RastaBlasta wrote:

Wasn't it turned on about a fortnight ago? I remember there were different stages in sort of warming it up, and it hasn't swallowed the universe yet.

People have said the same this about every particle accelerator built, OMGZ, teh humanitiz!

it has been delayed, it hasn't been turned on yet.  You'll know it's on when your face is swallowed by a giant black hole.

Actually, it'll happen so fast that you won't.

it take hours or months for the black hole to have a noticeable effect

it's hard to say whether or  not the earth or atmosphere would go first tho

RastaBlasta wrote:

People have said the same this about every particle accelerator built, OMGZ, teh humanitiz!

Hell, one of the longest in the world (if not the longest) is located in my town at Brookhaven National Laboratory. I'm not dead and the world's not swallowed up yet, so...

Poseidon wrote:

RastaBlasta wrote:

People have said the same this about every particle accelerator built, OMGZ, teh humanitiz!

Hell, one of the longest in the world (if not the longest) is located in my town at Brookhaven National Laboratory. I'm not dead and the world's not swallowed up yet, so...

lol

stanford and berkeley both have particle accelerators as well

although berkeley doesn't really matter as much because they're too busy sitting in trees to operate theirs

SamTheMan:D wrote:

when i see hadron collider i always think HARD ON

AHAHAHAHAHAHA

A hard on collider actually makes sense.  lmao I forgot what the proper term for phallic collision is though.

Blehm98 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Canadianloser wrote:

it has been delayed, it hasn't been turned on yet.  You'll know it's on when your face is swallowed by a giant black hole.

Actually, it'll happen so fast that you won't.

it take hours or months for the black hole to have a noticeable effect

it's hard to say whether or  not the earth or atmosphere would go first tho

I heard that if micro black holes where created, those which did not have the escape velocity to break earths gravity would eventually rest within the core of the earth. At the earliest, the earth would start having massive quakes and show signs of instability within 4-5 years.

Blehm98 wrote:

Volatile wrote:

Blehm98 wrote:

it take hours or months for the black hole to have a noticeable effect

it's hard to say whether or  not the earth or atmosphere would go first tho

I heard that if micro black holes where created, those which did not have the escape velocity to break earths gravity would eventually rest within the core of the earth. At the earliest, the earth would start having massive quakes and show signs of instability within 4-5 years.

well the core of the issue is that they'd have such weak gravity they wouldn't be able to suck anything before they evaporate

the event horizon of those black holes would just be too small

Well, technically electron orbitals are nothing more then probability fields... The electrons do not necessarily follow these paths they are simply the region where the electron is MOST LIKELY to be found... This means the electron COULD be anywhere else as the probability only APPROACHES  zero with the distance outside of these orbitals.

While the chance is slim to none it is POSSIBLE that one electron from each atom on earth could be within the event horizon of the African American hole...

Could you imagine the devastation if every atom on earth became positively charged? We are not out of the woods yet...

Last edited by VicktorVauhn (2008-08-07 01:59:51)

Blehm98 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

RastaBlasta wrote:

People have said the same this about every particle accelerator built, OMGZ, teh humanitiz!

Hell, one of the longest in the world (if not the longest) is located in my town at Brookhaven National Laboratory. I'm not dead and the world's not swallowed up yet, so...

lol

stanford and berkeley both have particle accelerators as well

although berkeley doesn't really matter as much because they're too busy sitting in smoking trees to operate theirs

fixed.

This was in a Scientific American article I read a while ago, but forgot to post it for you noobs

The report, 'Review of the Safety of LHC Collisions', published in the Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, proves that if particle collisions at the LHC had the power to destroy the Earth, we would never have been given the chance to worry about the LHC, because regular interactions with more energetic cosmic rays would already have destroyed the Earth.

The Safety Assessment Group writes, "Nature has already conducted the equivalent of about a hundred thousand LHC experimental programmes on Earth - and the planet still exists."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.j … lhc105.xml

|TG|VividSynergy wrote:

Look, live web-cam feed of the Hadron Collider.  Everything is fine guys.

http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html

Old but funny.

science has let me down again. I was counting on not having to hand in my essay next week