.Sup wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
.Sup wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
It doesn't really take much work to get quite a number of games to run just fine under Ubuntu. Even BF2 that hardly even runs under Windows can be ran under it.
And Crysis runs on very high too doesn't it? Don't bullshit me, I've tried Cedega and Wine.
Apparently you failed.
Performance of Cedega/Wine properly configured is very close to (and even beyond) that of Windows. I didn't say every game out there will run 100% fine on it, it doesn't, but many games do.
Besides, what computer runs Crysis on Very High? Crysis is nothing but very unoptimized and overhyped as a benchmark.
I failed? So you got Crysis to work in Linux? Pics
Maybe Crysis won't run, I didn't do any research on that. If it doesn't, it's probably not a lot of work left to get it running. The point I (and everyone else) are making, is that many games will run under Linux. Crysis is still only one game, even if it is Crysis, and even being Crysis, it's not the most important game in the world. Crysis is overhyped, and you're a living example of that.
.Sup wrote:
Defiance wrote:
.Sup wrote:
I dunno what you want to say to me.
Dx10 would be a massive waste in time for the Cedega devs.
You're bullshitting yourself, many games of many genres to satisfy many people can and do run well under Linux.
If you really want to play Crysis on Very High, which doesn't look all that special next to High, then you probably should use Windows.
If you don't want to set up Linux either and would rather chill and frag, go for it. Linux is great and all but I never liked the troubleshooting part of it. Either way, do what you want but don't bash one side for a reason that was only logical 4 years ago.
Have you ever installed Linux and actually played a game on it?
I have played BF2, CS, CSS, HL1, HL2, Portal and a little 2142 on Linux. And I'm far from an experienced user. The old seal of Windows being the only gaming OS is slowly wearing off.
