do u think this version will be good as the pc version or better???
dunno but just played some racing car game a t the shop and it looks better then my recently upgraded pc
I've seen some screenshots and the graphics are really nice.
I don't have a xbox 360 (don't need one).
I think they will slow down infantry combat even more because you need to aim with a controller.
If I had a xbox 360 I would buy it (and plug a mouse and keyboard into my xbox).
I don't have a xbox 360 (don't need one).
I think they will slow down infantry combat even more because you need to aim with a controller.
If I had a xbox 360 I would buy it (and plug a mouse and keyboard into my xbox).
is this for Modern Combat, or Vanilla Bf2?
Me too... I would use a mouse and keyboard for just about any game though, except fighting games...Metaltop wrote:
I've seen some screenshots and the graphics are really nice.
I don't have a xbox 360 (don't need one).
I think they will slow down infantry combat even more because you need to aim with a controller.
If I had a xbox 360 I would buy it (and plug a mouse and keyboard into my xbox).
Perfect Dark Zero looks good, not as good as the original though..... Think I'll stick with my crappy PC for now...
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Ive seen a google video of someone playing bf2 with a xbox, looked absolutly pants compared to our pc versions. If offered a swap I wouldnt wanna know.
Modern Combat on the 360 may have nice looking graphics, but it is limited to 24 player multiplayer. I prefer having the choice of 64.
YES!! I KNEW IT!!! MC Licks balls so much, for one, you dont get jets or huge ass maps! plus there are no unlocks or expansions for it
BF2>MC
BF2>MC
OOh man, i just watched some in-game video footage of moderen combat on x-box..
It sucks big time ! Looks so cheap en childisch.. i dont know..
Well it's crap !! 'nough said !
It sucks big time ! Looks so cheap en childisch.. i dont know..
Well it's crap !! 'nough said !
i love xbox 360 but BF2 is not a console game. shooters, simulators and real time strategy games should remain on PC's. sports, fighting, driving and adventure belong on ports. RPG's can do both.
nuff said...
nuff said...
i just watched the game it looks good but as a serperate game not related to bf2. the graphics are nice though wish bf2 came with those graphics. but as i was saying bf2 is completely different to that it should not go under the same name. bf2 was just added to the name because the pc version was soo popular they wanted people to think this one was the same except on xbox.
Last edited by timboon (2006-03-09 05:06:14)
It doesn't have a real or gritty looking feel like bf2 does. Just like all these next gen console games. Everything looks almost cartoonish. I don' understand what everyone sees.
Sorry for the childish remark, but -
XBOX SUX COX
Thats all there is to it... 360 or not the graphics dont look noticably better than a high end pc, plus all the games that are out for it are rubbish.
Perfect Dark Zero for example is a pile of crap - nowhere near as good as the n64 version... or goldeneye for that matter!
FACT: Microsoft pushed the latest next gen consoles into release earlier than usual.
FACT: XBOX had the shortest console lifespan of any console EVER (because Microsoft wanted to make more money by selling more consoles)
FACT: The 360 offers nothing more than every other console except the graphics... which arent that good!! Have you SEEN the 360 version of Quake 4?!
Laughable!
FACT: The "Best" game out for xbox is Halo (one or two) and come on lets face it - thats crap too.
Bland levels Bland enemies Blander Gameplay.
*Yawn* Nothing new. Alls it offered was the console markets first taste of proper online play...
This in mind the 360 version of Battlefield 2 will probably suck...
I'm hoping they bring the Xbox users into the PC servers....
Heh heh heh - then we can (/1337 speak enable) PWN them like the n00bs they are (/1337 speak disable)
Ahem... Sorry about the rant....
But i hate microsoft
XBOX SUX COX
Thats all there is to it... 360 or not the graphics dont look noticably better than a high end pc, plus all the games that are out for it are rubbish.
Perfect Dark Zero for example is a pile of crap - nowhere near as good as the n64 version... or goldeneye for that matter!
FACT: Microsoft pushed the latest next gen consoles into release earlier than usual.
FACT: XBOX had the shortest console lifespan of any console EVER (because Microsoft wanted to make more money by selling more consoles)
FACT: The 360 offers nothing more than every other console except the graphics... which arent that good!! Have you SEEN the 360 version of Quake 4?!
Laughable!
FACT: The "Best" game out for xbox is Halo (one or two) and come on lets face it - thats crap too.
Bland levels Bland enemies Blander Gameplay.
*Yawn* Nothing new. Alls it offered was the console markets first taste of proper online play...
This in mind the 360 version of Battlefield 2 will probably suck...
I'm hoping they bring the Xbox users into the PC servers....
Heh heh heh - then we can (/1337 speak enable) PWN them like the n00bs they are (/1337 speak disable)
Ahem... Sorry about the rant....
But i hate microsoft
Last edited by Shin_Seffron (2006-03-09 05:32:04)
Erm are Micro$oft not loosing money on the consoles?Shin_Seffron wrote:
FACT: XBOX had the shortest console lifespan of any console EVER (because Microsoft wanted to make more money by selling more consoles)
I heard that on the xbox they were loosing £200 with every sale.
And that they are probably loosing the same amount on the 360?
Yeah I heard that theyre losing money on each console sold and they had like 200 million dollars loss last year or something....theDude5B wrote:
Erm are Micro$oft not loosing money on the consoles?Shin_Seffron wrote:
FACT: XBOX had the shortest console lifespan of any console EVER (because Microsoft wanted to make more money by selling more consoles)
I heard that on the xbox they were loosing £200 with every sale.
And that they are probably loosing the same amount on the 360?
I didnt explain that point fully, so what i meant was...
Microsoft realised they wernt selling anywhere near the amount of consoles that Sony did with the PLaystation 2.
Hell they didnt sell as many consoles as Nintendo's Gamecube, so how do they sort out this problem.... new half-decent games? NOPE
Release a Next Gen console before everyone else so people will buy it just so they have marginally better graphics than PS2 and Cube owners? YES
Average console lifespans are about 5-6 years... and the Xbox was out about 3-4 years depending on which countrys release dates you look at
Yeah that is the main reason for it. But they are walking a fine line as the PS3 is likely to be much better when it is released. But this discussion is now entering xbox360 forum territory so i am going to shut up now!!Shin_Seffron wrote:
Yeah I heard that theyre losing money on each console sold and they had like 200 million dollars loss last year or something....theDude5B wrote:
Erm are Micro$oft not loosing money on the consoles?Shin_Seffron wrote:
FACT: XBOX had the shortest console lifespan of any console EVER (because Microsoft wanted to make more money by selling more consoles)
I heard that on the xbox they were loosing £200 with every sale.
And that they are probably loosing the same amount on the 360?
I didnt explain that point fully, so what i meant was...
Microsoft realised they wernt selling anywhere near the amount of consoles that Sony did with the PLaystation 2.
Hell they didnt sell as many consoles as Nintendo's Gamecube, so how do they sort out this problem.... new half-decent games? NOPE
Release a Next Gen console before everyone else so people will buy it just so they have marginally better graphics than PS2 and Cube owners? YES
Average console lifespans are about 5-6 years... and the Xbox was out about 3-4 years depending on which countrys release dates you look at
I played the 360 the other day was considering buying it but i wasnt impressed i was expectin more than it was!!
no way it will be a contender for the pc version....Bag o Gash
no way it will be a contender for the pc version....Bag o Gash
Yes thats right, by waiting the PS3 will be developed better,theDude5B wrote:
Yeah that is the main reason for it. But they are walking a fine line as the PS3 is likely to be much better when it is released. But this discussion is now entering xbox360 forum territory so i am going to shut up now!!
Also by that standard the Revolution will be Great as well....
I mean come on, at least Ninty are trying something new with the way you play games...
Imagine BF2 where you can actually shoot with the controller... and the sensors on it allow you to duck behind the cover of your couch....
hmmm possibility's...
its the modern combat version. the 360 version is the same as the xbox version only with better graphics and more players per map. nothing special. they still have no commander, no artillery positions to destroy (but they can call in a strike), no UAV (but they got satellite sweep that the sniper can call in and everyone in the team sees the red dots) and no medic class.Sarrk wrote:
is this for Modern Combat, or Vanilla Bf2?
im sure there are more differences between the console and the PC version but i have not played the console version in a long time. but i think the PC version still has better graphics and gameplay.
the xbox/360 versions sound god dam awful then!bigelectricat wrote:
its the modern combat version. the 360 version is the same as the xbox version only with better graphics and more players per map. nothing special. they still have no commander, no artillery positions to destroy (but they can call in a strike), no UAV (but they got satellite sweep that the sniper can call in and everyone in the team sees the red dots) and no medic class.Sarrk wrote:
is this for Modern Combat, or Vanilla Bf2?
im sure there are more differences between the console and the PC version but i have not played the console version in a long time. but i think the PC version still has better graphics and gameplay.