Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7040|London, England

lowing wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

so apparently you are part of the problem and not the solution
don't see you doin' anything to help
Help with what? Pay other peoples fuckin' bills? I am paying my mortgage, and believe me, my bills are paid before I buy toys. I also do not owe shit on credit cards. So there ya go, I pay my debts, that is me doing my part
Who's to say that other people are buying consoles and shit before they pay off their bills/mortgage/debt?

You're automatically assuming that the majority of people who buy unnecessary things are buying them instead of doing the important shit first. Or buying them on credit which they won't be able to pay back...you're assuming that the people here that you're yelling at are also like that. Kind of a low opinion of people don't you think?

Maybe you're right in some cases, but to automatically start yelling at members here is abit lame
pndragon26
Member
+23|7105
So all those banks and companies bought gaming consoles? Those bastards!!!
GorillaTicTacs
Member
+231|6792|Kyiv, Ukraine
Expect lowing and his ilk to keep going further "off the reservation".

Its a solidified 12-point spread now, and only growing.

The wingnuts will get even more shrill in the coming week or two, blaming the problems of the world on everyone except themselves.  Have a heart though, their world is coming to an end and their world view will need to catch up.  Its a traumatic experience for some people to do it all at once.  Check out the recent audience make-up of McCain's rallies, the hard-core nuts that show up are even scaring him.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7047|IRELAND

There's me reading financial supplements, enterwebs and watching documentaries on banking and bankers for the past few months and wasting my time. What does every leading financial expert in the world know anyway. When all along it was spotty teens hassling their parents into buying them a Wii that is bringing the world into economic collapse. And this was known 2 years ago! I want to know who sat on their hands on this issue and let it spiral out of control. Stop hassling the financial regulators, it was Nintendo all along. Cheers for setting me straight lowing!

Last edited by JahManRed (2008-10-10 05:57:05)

Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6567|'straya
So i just want to get this straight.

Buying Wii's ruined the American economy?

quick better bailout Nintendo. wait.
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7090|UK
who in their right mind posts a BLOG as a source?!
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA
Ok ok ok, wait a second, I have not said gamers drive the economy or the WII is responsible for the economy or anything like it. What I am pointing out is, this "economic crisis" is billed as the worse event in economics in modern history and has been compared to the great depression.

Now, during the great depression people in suits were in bread lines all across the country people were REALLY hurting. Now in this "economic crisis", luxeries are still flying off of the shelves.

Also, people buying is not the problem, never has been, people are charging this shit to credit, and that is what the problem has been all along.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

lowing wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:


don't see you doin' anything to help
Help with what? Pay other peoples fuckin' bills? I am paying my mortgage, and believe me, my bills are paid before I buy toys. I also do not owe shit on credit cards. So there ya go, I pay my debts, that is me doing my part
Who's to say that other people are buying consoles and shit before they pay off their bills/mortgage/debt?

You're automatically assuming that the majority of people who buy unnecessary things are buying them instead of doing the important shit first. Or buying them on credit which they won't be able to pay back...you're assuming that the people here that you're yelling at are also like that. Kind of a low opinion of people don't you think?

Maybe you're right in some cases, but to automatically start yelling at members here is abit lame
Peopel are bitching about the price of gas, it is killing their budget etc..........Yet, they still have enough credit or cash for gaming and other luxeries.
san4
The Mas
+311|7107|NYC, a place to live

lowing wrote:

Ok ok ok, wait a second, I have not said gamers drive the economy or the WII is responsible for the economy or anything like it. What I am pointing out is, this "economic crisis" is billed as the worse event in economics in modern history and has been compared to the great depression.

Now, during the great depression people in suits were in bread lines all across the country people were REALLY hurting. Now in this "economic crisis", luxeries are still flying off of the shelves.

Also, people buying is not the problem, never has been, people are charging this shit to credit, and that is what the problem has been all along.
It's not the worst event in economic history, it's the worst event for rich people in recent economic history. We're bailing out investment banks because that's where the rich people work.
Schittloaf
not fulla schit
+23|6322|MN

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

Expect lowing and his ilk to keep going further "off the reservation".

Its a solidified 12-point spread now, and only growing.

The wingnuts will get even more shrill in the coming week or two, blaming the problems of the world on everyone except themselves.  Have a heart though, their world is coming to an end and their world view will need to catch up.  Its a traumatic experience for some people to do it all at once.  Check out the recent audience make-up of McCain's rallies, the hard-core nuts that show up are even scaring him.
only when they stack the poll noob! which every new channel has been guilty of . 


OBAMA not Qualified!
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

san4 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ok ok ok, wait a second, I have not said gamers drive the economy or the WII is responsible for the economy or anything like it. What I am pointing out is, this "economic crisis" is billed as the worse event in economics in modern history and has been compared to the great depression.

Now, during the great depression people in suits were in bread lines all across the country people were REALLY hurting. Now in this "economic crisis", luxeries are still flying off of the shelves.

Also, people buying is not the problem, never has been, people are charging this shit to credit, and that is what the problem has been all along.
It's not the worst event in economic history, it's the worst event for rich people in recent economic history. We're bailing out investment banks because that's where the rich people work.
Obama, who is seeking to defeat Republican John McCain and become America's first black president when the country votes on November 4, said the United States was enduring a crisis that has not been seen in generations, since the 1930s Great Depression.

"People are anxious about their futures," he said.

"We are going through one of the most difficult times that we've seen certainly in our lifetimes. We're in the midst of two wars. Terrorist attacks are still occurring. We now have the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and it's not over yet."


taken from http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080923/ts … 0923140904


so yeah, basically even the savior says it is the worst since the great depression. So my question is if it is so bad, where are people getting the money for luxeries? and if they are charging it, now ya know why we have this probelm. People in debt.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

Expect lowing and his ilk to keep going further "off the reservation".

Its a solidified 12-point spread now, and only growing.

The wingnuts will get even more shrill in the coming week or two, blaming the problems of the world on everyone except themselves.  Have a heart though, their world is coming to an end and their world view will need to catch up.  Its a traumatic experience for some people to do it all at once.  Check out the recent audience make-up of McCain's rallies, the hard-core nuts that show up are even scaring him.
Yeah now there is a twist, I blame everyone for my problems except me.

Pal, I pay my bills and I have never not once without exception taken any welfare from any taxpayers.
san4
The Mas
+311|7107|NYC, a place to live

lowing wrote:

san4 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ok ok ok, wait a second, I have not said gamers drive the economy or the WII is responsible for the economy or anything like it. What I am pointing out is, this "economic crisis" is billed as the worse event in economics in modern history and has been compared to the great depression.

Now, during the great depression people in suits were in bread lines all across the country people were REALLY hurting. Now in this "economic crisis", luxeries are still flying off of the shelves.

Also, people buying is not the problem, never has been, people are charging this shit to credit, and that is what the problem has been all along.
It's not the worst event in economic history, it's the worst event for rich people in recent economic history. We're bailing out investment banks because that's where the rich people work.
Obama, who is seeking to defeat Republican John McCain and become America's first black president when the country votes on November 4, said the United States was enduring a crisis that has not been seen in generations, since the 1930s Great Depression.

"People are anxious about their futures," he said.

"We are going through one of the most difficult times that we've seen certainly in our lifetimes. We're in the midst of two wars. Terrorist attacks are still occurring. We now have the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and it's not over yet."


taken from http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080923/ts … 0923140904


so yeah, basically even the savior says it is the worst since the great depression. So my question is if it is so bad, where are people getting the money for luxeries? and if they are charging it, now ya know why we have this probelm. People in debt.
Perhaps you've noticed, but when Obama talks about the economic crisis he does not know what he's talking about. He voted for the bailout bill ffs.

But the problem ain't people in debt, it's banks in debt.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6956|Long Island, New York

san4 wrote:

lowing wrote:

san4 wrote:


It's not the worst event in economic history, it's the worst event for rich people in recent economic history. We're bailing out investment banks because that's where the rich people work.
Obama, who is seeking to defeat Republican John McCain and become America's first black president when the country votes on November 4, said the United States was enduring a crisis that has not been seen in generations, since the 1930s Great Depression.

"People are anxious about their futures," he said.

"We are going through one of the most difficult times that we've seen certainly in our lifetimes. We're in the midst of two wars. Terrorist attacks are still occurring. We now have the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and it's not over yet."


taken from http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080923/ts … 0923140904


so yeah, basically even the savior says it is the worst since the great depression. So my question is if it is so bad, where are people getting the money for luxeries? and if they are charging it, now ya know why we have this probelm. People in debt.
Perhaps you've noticed, but when Obama talks about the economic crisis he does not know what he's talking about. He voted for the bailout bill ffs.

But the problem ain't people in debt, it's banks in debt.
IMO, I don't think Obama would have voted for it if he was president. I think it was a political move because the media has trained the public to think "OOO IT SAYS BAILOUT, VOTE FOR IT GUIZ!".

It's a shame that it was a political move, but that's politics today for you.
Pierre
I hunt criminals down for a living
+68|7094|Belgium

lowing wrote:

Ok ok ok, wait a second, I have not said gamers drive the economy or the WII is responsible for the economy or anything like it. What I am pointing out is, this "economic crisis" is billed as the worse event in economics in modern history and has been compared to the great depression.

Now, during the great depression people in suits were in bread lines all across the country people were REALLY hurting. Now in this "economic crisis", luxeries are still flying off of the shelves.

Also, people buying is not the problem, never has been, people are charging this shit to credit, and that is what the problem has been all along.
There are other threads about the blame for the economic crisis, but they don't mention the word 'Muslims' so maybe you didn't find them.

Anyway, you're right about the American habit of charging everything on credit being a problem, you can thank Greenspan for that.

The crisis however is much worse and deeper. If you want a serious explanation on how it started, you should read Revisiting my February paper “The Risk of a Systemic Financial Meltdown: The 12 Steps to Financial Disaster”…And Some New Policy Recommendations to Avoid the Meltdown by Nouriel Roubini.

Roubini wrote:

First, this is the worst housing recession in US history and there is no sign it will bottom out any time soon…

Second, losses for the financial system from the subprime disaster are now estimated to be as high as $250 to $300 billion. But the financial losses will not be only in subprime mortgages and the related RMBS and CDOs. They are now spreading to near prime and prime mortgages as the same reckless lending practices in subprime …were occurring across the entire spectrum of mortgages;…Also add to the woes and losses of the financial institutions the meltdown of hundreds of billions of off balance SIVs and conduits;..And because of securitization the securitized toxic waste has been spread from banks to capital markets and their investors in the US and abroad, thus increasing – rather than reducing systemic risk – and making the credit crunch global.

Third, the recession will lead – as it is already doing – to a sharp increase in defaults on other forms of unsecured consumer debt: credit cards, auto loans, student loans…

Fourth, while there is serious uncertainty about the losses that monolines will undertake on their insurance of RMBS, CDO and other toxic ABS products, it is now clear that such losses are much higher than the $10-15 billion rescue package that regulators are trying to patch up. Some monolines are actually borderline insolvent and none of them deserves at this point a AAA rating regardless of how much realistic recapitalization is provided…The downgrade of the monolines will also lead to large losses – and potential runs – on the money market funds that invested in some of these toxic products. The money market funds that are backed by banks or that bought liquidity protection from banks against the risk of a fall in the NAV may avoid a run but such a rescue will exacerbate the capital and liquidity problems of their underwriters…

Fifth, the commercial real estate loan market will soon enter into a meltdown similar to the subprime one…And new origination of commercial real estate mortgages is already semi-frozen today; the commercial real estate mortgage market is already seizing up today.

Sixth, it is possible that some large regional or even national bank that is very exposed to mortgages, residential and commercial, will go bankrupt. Thus some big banks may join the 200 plus subprime lenders that have gone bankrupt. This, like in the case of Northern Rock, will lead to depositors’ panic and concerns about deposit insurance. The Fed will have to reaffirm the implicit doctrine that some banks are too big to be allowed to fail. But these bank bankruptcies will lead to severe fiscal losses of bank bailout and effective nationalization of the affected institutions…

Seventh, the banks losses on their portfolio of leveraged loans are already large and growing. The ability of financial institutions to syndicate and securitize their leveraged loans – a good chunk of which were issued to finance very risky and reckless LBOs – is now at serious risk. And hundreds of billions of dollars of leveraged loans are now stuck on the balance sheet of financial institutions at values well below par (currently about 90 cents on the dollar but soon much lower). Add to this that many reckless LBOs (as senseless LBOs with debt to earnings ratio of seven or eight had become the norm during the go-go days of the credit bubble) have now been postponed, restructured or cancelled. And add to this problem the fact that some actual large LBOs will end up into bankruptcy as some of these corporations taken private are effectively bankrupt in a recession and given the repricing of risk; convenant-lite and PIK toggles may only postpone – not avoid – such bankruptcies and make them uglier when they do eventually occur…

Eighth, once a severe recession is underway a massive wave of corporate defaults will take place. In a typical year US corporate default rates are about 3.8% (average for 1971-2007); in 2006 and 2007 this figure was a puny 0.6%. And in a typical US recession such default rates surge above 10%....Corporate default rates will surge during the 2008 recession and peak well above 10% based on recent studies. And once defaults are higher and credit spreads higher massive losses will occur among the credit default swaps (CDS) that provided protection against corporate defaults. ..If losses are large some of the counterparties who sold protection – possibly large institutions such as monolines, some hedge funds or a large broker dealer – may go bankrupt leading to even greater systemic risk as those who bought protection may face counterparties who cannot pay.

Ninth, the “shadow banking system” (as defined by the PIMCO folks) or more precisely the “shadow financial system” (as it is composed by non-bank financial institutions) will soon get into serious trouble. This shadow financial system is composed of financial institutions that – like banks – borrow short and in liquid forms and lend or invest long in more illiquid assets. This system includes: SIVs, conduits, money market funds, monolines, investment banks, hedge funds and other non-bank financial institutions. All these institutions are subject to market risk, credit risk (given their risky investments) and especially liquidity/rollover risk as their short term liquid liabilities can be rolled off easily while their assets are more long term and illiquid. Unlike banks these non-bank financial institutions don’t have direct or indirect access to the central bank’s lender of last resort support as they are not depository institutions. Thus, in the case of financial distress and/or illiquidity they may go bankrupt because of both insolvency and/or lack of liquidity and inability to roll over or refinance their short term liabilities. Deepening problems in the economy and in the financial markets and poor risk managements will lead some of these institutions to go belly up: a few large hedge funds, a few money market funds, the entire SIV system and, possibly, one or two large and systemically important broker dealers. Dealing with the distress of this shadow financial system will be very problematic as this system – stressed by credit and liquidity problems - cannot be directly rescued by the central banks in the way that banks can.

Tenth, stock markets in the US and abroad will start pricing a severe US recession – rather than a mild recession – and a sharp global economic slowdown. The fall in stock markets… will resume as investors will soon realize that the economic downturn is more severe, that the monolines will not be rescued, that financial losses will mount, and that earnings will sharply drop in a recession not just among financial firms but also non financial ones. A few long equity hedge funds will go belly up in 2008 after the massive losses of many hedge funds in August, November and, again, January 2008. Large margin calls will be triggered for long equity investors and another round of massive equity shorting will take place. Long covering and margin calls will lead to a cascading fall in equity markets in the US and a transmission to global equity markets. US and global equity markets will enter into a persistent bear market as in a typical US recession the S&P500 falls by about 28%.

Eleventh, the worsening credit crunch that is affecting most credit markets and credit derivative markets will lead to a dry-up of liquidity in a variety of financial markets, including otherwise very liquid derivatives markets. Another round of credit crunch in interbank markets will ensue triggered by counterparty risk, lack of trust, liquidity premia and credit risk. A variety of interbank rates – TED spreads, BOR-OIS spreads, BOT – Tbill spreads, interbank-policy rate spreads, swap spreads, VIX and other gauges of investors’ risk aversion – will massively widen again. Even the easing of the liquidity crunch after massive central banks’ actions in December and January will reverse as credit concerns keep interbank spread wide in spite of further injections of liquidity by central banks.

Twelfth, a vicious circle of losses, capital reduction, credit contraction, forced liquidation and fire sales of assets at below fundamental prices will ensue leading to a cascading and mounting cycle of losses and further credit contraction. In illiquid market actual market prices are now even lower than the lower fundamental value that they now have given the credit problems in the economy. Market prices include a large illiquidity discount on top of the discount due to the credit and fundamental problems of the underlying assets that are backing the distressed financial assets. Capital losses will lead to margin calls and further reduction of risk taking by a variety of financial institutions that are now forced to mark to market their positions. Such a forced fire sale of assets in illiquid markets will lead to further losses that will further contract credit and trigger further margin calls and disintermediation of credit. The triggering event for the next round of this cascade is the downgrade of the monolines and the ensuing sharp drop in equity markets; both will trigger margin calls and further credit disintermediation.

Based on estimates by Goldman Sachs $200 billion of losses in the financial system lead to a contraction of credit of $2 trillion given that institutions hold about $10 of assets per dollar of capital. The recapitalization of banks sovereign wealth funds – about $80 billion so far – will be unable to stop this credit disintermediation – (the move from off balance sheet to on balance sheet and moves of assets and liabilities from the shadow banking system to the formal banking system) and the ensuing contraction in credit as the mounting losses will dominate by a large margin any bank recapitalization from SWFs. A contagious and cascading spiral of credit disintermediation, credit contraction, sharp fall in asset prices and sharp widening in credit spreads will then be transmitted to most parts of the financial system. This massive credit crunch will make the economic contraction more severe and lead to further financial losses. Total losses in the financial system will add up to more than $1 trillion and the economic recession will become deeper, more protracted and severe.

A near global economic recession will ensue as the financial and credit losses and the credit crunch spread around the world. Panic, fire sales, cascading fall in asset prices will exacerbate the financial and real economic distress as a number of large and systemically important financial institutions go bankrupt. A 1987 style stock market crash could occur leading to further panic and severe financial and economic distress. Monetary and fiscal easing will not be able to prevent a systemic financial meltdown as credit and insolvency problems trump illiquidity problems. The lack of trust in counterparties – driven by the opacity and lack of transparency in financial markets, and uncertainty about the size of the losses and who is holding the toxic waste securities – will add to the impotence of monetary policy and lead to massive hoarding of liquidity that will exacerbates the liquidity and credit crunch.

In this meltdown scenario US and global financial markets will experience their most severe crisis in the last quarter of a century.
Bottomline: the mean reason is the greed of the bankers: they activily sold loans to people who they knew would never be able to repay, and next they covered these loans up and resold them (credit swaps) worldwide so they wouldn't get stuck with them when the ball would drop.

Maybe you would call that 'personnal responsability'. I'd call it fraud.
GorillaTicTacs
Member
+231|6792|Kyiv, Ukraine

lowing wrote:

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

Expect lowing and his ilk to keep going further "off the reservation".

Its a solidified 12-point spread now, and only growing.

The wingnuts will get even more shrill in the coming week or two, blaming the problems of the world on everyone except themselves.  Have a heart though, their world is coming to an end and their world view will need to catch up.  Its a traumatic experience for some people to do it all at once.  Check out the recent audience make-up of McCain's rallies, the hard-core nuts that show up are even scaring him.
Yeah now there is a twist, I blame everyone for my problems except me.

Pal, I pay my bills and I have never not once without exception taken any welfare from any taxpayers.
Did you ever vote for, donate to, provide or accept patronage (as a customer, employee, etc), or support in any meaningful way any representative, employer, leader, or colleague that had a hand in this crisis or that has lead to the implosion of the conservative party in the US?

Every talking point you regurgitate, every chain mail you forward, every vote you cast, every idiot you influence to do the same, and every other action you take as a result of a delusional world view perpetuated by the right-wing propaganda machine makes you complicit.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6571|what

Lowing still hasn't quantified or qualified in any manner, at all, whatsoever, why he chose to blast the Wii's reputation.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6602|Ireland
It couldn't have been that the housing market of way over inflated due to banks giving out unrealistic loans and the first time someone got layed off they would lose their house and then SHAZAMMM suddenly we hit critical mass when housing prices went down and the banks had to take the hit themselves for the unrealistic preditory loans they had been able to give for years due to the constant rise in house prices.

Or it is because poor people buy WIIs on credit cards that bank should have never issued them in the first place.

Seems everything leads back to greedy banks fleecing the public for years and finally getting burnt on it, perhaps they did this knowing the government would just bail them out so wtf?
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6948|Global Command
Yup.

The real problem in our economy is that Bush and his minions let big oil and big interest banks fuck us to the point of breaking.
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|7050|Finland

In an attempt to clean this thread up (you know who you are), I became astounded by its total and utter weirdness.

Be as it may, the people who can't see some of their posts any longer in this thread, I advise you to either post relevant and constructive material or to shut your traps, regardless of the absurdity that the OP suggests.

Cool?
I need around tree fiddy.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7000|SE London

lowing wrote:

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

Expect lowing and his ilk to keep going further "off the reservation".

Its a solidified 12-point spread now, and only growing.

The wingnuts will get even more shrill in the coming week or two, blaming the problems of the world on everyone except themselves.  Have a heart though, their world is coming to an end and their world view will need to catch up.  Its a traumatic experience for some people to do it all at once.  Check out the recent audience make-up of McCain's rallies, the hard-core nuts that show up are even scaring him.
Yeah now there is a twist, I blame everyone for my problems except me.

Pal, I pay my bills and I have never not once without exception taken any welfare from any taxpayers.
Do you spend a large proportion of your income on frivolous rubbish?

If not, you're not supporting the economy properly - like all those people out buying Wiis, who are doing their bit and driving the economy forwards.
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7161|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann
Lowing has come out with some doozies it has to be said, but dismissing the current global economic catastrophe as "a conspiracy theory"  based on sales of the wii has to be his best yet.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

Pierre wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ok ok ok, wait a second, I have not said gamers drive the economy or the WII is responsible for the economy or anything like it. What I am pointing out is, this "economic crisis" is billed as the worse event in economics in modern history and has been compared to the great depression.

Now, during the great depression people in suits were in bread lines all across the country people were REALLY hurting. Now in this "economic crisis", luxeries are still flying off of the shelves.

Also, people buying is not the problem, never has been, people are charging this shit to credit, and that is what the problem has been all along.
There are other threads about the blame for the economic crisis, but they don't mention the word 'Muslims' so maybe you didn't find them.

Anyway, you're right about the American habit of charging everything on credit being a problem, you can thank Greenspan for that.

The crisis however is much worse and deeper. If you want a serious explanation on how it started, you should read Revisiting my February paper “The Risk of a Systemic Financial Meltdown: The 12 Steps to Financial Disaster”…And Some New Policy Recommendations to Avoid the Meltdown by Nouriel Roubini.

Roubini wrote:

First, this is the worst housing recession in US history and there is no sign it will bottom out any time soon…

Second, losses for the financial system from the subprime disaster are now estimated to be as high as $250 to $300 billion. But the financial losses will not be only in subprime mortgages and the related RMBS and CDOs. They are now spreading to near prime and prime mortgages as the same reckless lending practices in subprime …were occurring across the entire spectrum of mortgages;…Also add to the woes and losses of the financial institutions the meltdown of hundreds of billions of off balance SIVs and conduits;..And because of securitization the securitized toxic waste has been spread from banks to capital markets and their investors in the US and abroad, thus increasing – rather than reducing systemic risk – and making the credit crunch global.

Third, the recession will lead – as it is already doing – to a sharp increase in defaults on other forms of unsecured consumer debt: credit cards, auto loans, student loans…

Fourth, while there is serious uncertainty about the losses that monolines will undertake on their insurance of RMBS, CDO and other toxic ABS products, it is now clear that such losses are much higher than the $10-15 billion rescue package that regulators are trying to patch up. Some monolines are actually borderline insolvent and none of them deserves at this point a AAA rating regardless of how much realistic recapitalization is provided…The downgrade of the monolines will also lead to large losses – and potential runs – on the money market funds that invested in some of these toxic products. The money market funds that are backed by banks or that bought liquidity protection from banks against the risk of a fall in the NAV may avoid a run but such a rescue will exacerbate the capital and liquidity problems of their underwriters…

Fifth, the commercial real estate loan market will soon enter into a meltdown similar to the subprime one…And new origination of commercial real estate mortgages is already semi-frozen today; the commercial real estate mortgage market is already seizing up today.

Sixth, it is possible that some large regional or even national bank that is very exposed to mortgages, residential and commercial, will go bankrupt. Thus some big banks may join the 200 plus subprime lenders that have gone bankrupt. This, like in the case of Northern Rock, will lead to depositors’ panic and concerns about deposit insurance. The Fed will have to reaffirm the implicit doctrine that some banks are too big to be allowed to fail. But these bank bankruptcies will lead to severe fiscal losses of bank bailout and effective nationalization of the affected institutions…

Seventh, the banks losses on their portfolio of leveraged loans are already large and growing. The ability of financial institutions to syndicate and securitize their leveraged loans – a good chunk of which were issued to finance very risky and reckless LBOs – is now at serious risk. And hundreds of billions of dollars of leveraged loans are now stuck on the balance sheet of financial institutions at values well below par (currently about 90 cents on the dollar but soon much lower). Add to this that many reckless LBOs (as senseless LBOs with debt to earnings ratio of seven or eight had become the norm during the go-go days of the credit bubble) have now been postponed, restructured or cancelled. And add to this problem the fact that some actual large LBOs will end up into bankruptcy as some of these corporations taken private are effectively bankrupt in a recession and given the repricing of risk; convenant-lite and PIK toggles may only postpone – not avoid – such bankruptcies and make them uglier when they do eventually occur…

Eighth, once a severe recession is underway a massive wave of corporate defaults will take place. In a typical year US corporate default rates are about 3.8% (average for 1971-2007); in 2006 and 2007 this figure was a puny 0.6%. And in a typical US recession such default rates surge above 10%....Corporate default rates will surge during the 2008 recession and peak well above 10% based on recent studies. And once defaults are higher and credit spreads higher massive losses will occur among the credit default swaps (CDS) that provided protection against corporate defaults. ..If losses are large some of the counterparties who sold protection – possibly large institutions such as monolines, some hedge funds or a large broker dealer – may go bankrupt leading to even greater systemic risk as those who bought protection may face counterparties who cannot pay.

Ninth, the “shadow banking system” (as defined by the PIMCO folks) or more precisely the “shadow financial system” (as it is composed by non-bank financial institutions) will soon get into serious trouble. This shadow financial system is composed of financial institutions that – like banks – borrow short and in liquid forms and lend or invest long in more illiquid assets. This system includes: SIVs, conduits, money market funds, monolines, investment banks, hedge funds and other non-bank financial institutions. All these institutions are subject to market risk, credit risk (given their risky investments) and especially liquidity/rollover risk as their short term liquid liabilities can be rolled off easily while their assets are more long term and illiquid. Unlike banks these non-bank financial institutions don’t have direct or indirect access to the central bank’s lender of last resort support as they are not depository institutions. Thus, in the case of financial distress and/or illiquidity they may go bankrupt because of both insolvency and/or lack of liquidity and inability to roll over or refinance their short term liabilities. Deepening problems in the economy and in the financial markets and poor risk managements will lead some of these institutions to go belly up: a few large hedge funds, a few money market funds, the entire SIV system and, possibly, one or two large and systemically important broker dealers. Dealing with the distress of this shadow financial system will be very problematic as this system – stressed by credit and liquidity problems - cannot be directly rescued by the central banks in the way that banks can.

Tenth, stock markets in the US and abroad will start pricing a severe US recession – rather than a mild recession – and a sharp global economic slowdown. The fall in stock markets… will resume as investors will soon realize that the economic downturn is more severe, that the monolines will not be rescued, that financial losses will mount, and that earnings will sharply drop in a recession not just among financial firms but also non financial ones. A few long equity hedge funds will go belly up in 2008 after the massive losses of many hedge funds in August, November and, again, January 2008. Large margin calls will be triggered for long equity investors and another round of massive equity shorting will take place. Long covering and margin calls will lead to a cascading fall in equity markets in the US and a transmission to global equity markets. US and global equity markets will enter into a persistent bear market as in a typical US recession the S&P500 falls by about 28%.

Eleventh, the worsening credit crunch that is affecting most credit markets and credit derivative markets will lead to a dry-up of liquidity in a variety of financial markets, including otherwise very liquid derivatives markets. Another round of credit crunch in interbank markets will ensue triggered by counterparty risk, lack of trust, liquidity premia and credit risk. A variety of interbank rates – TED spreads, BOR-OIS spreads, BOT – Tbill spreads, interbank-policy rate spreads, swap spreads, VIX and other gauges of investors’ risk aversion – will massively widen again. Even the easing of the liquidity crunch after massive central banks’ actions in December and January will reverse as credit concerns keep interbank spread wide in spite of further injections of liquidity by central banks.

Twelfth, a vicious circle of losses, capital reduction, credit contraction, forced liquidation and fire sales of assets at below fundamental prices will ensue leading to a cascading and mounting cycle of losses and further credit contraction. In illiquid market actual market prices are now even lower than the lower fundamental value that they now have given the credit problems in the economy. Market prices include a large illiquidity discount on top of the discount due to the credit and fundamental problems of the underlying assets that are backing the distressed financial assets. Capital losses will lead to margin calls and further reduction of risk taking by a variety of financial institutions that are now forced to mark to market their positions. Such a forced fire sale of assets in illiquid markets will lead to further losses that will further contract credit and trigger further margin calls and disintermediation of credit. The triggering event for the next round of this cascade is the downgrade of the monolines and the ensuing sharp drop in equity markets; both will trigger margin calls and further credit disintermediation.

Based on estimates by Goldman Sachs $200 billion of losses in the financial system lead to a contraction of credit of $2 trillion given that institutions hold about $10 of assets per dollar of capital. The recapitalization of banks sovereign wealth funds – about $80 billion so far – will be unable to stop this credit disintermediation – (the move from off balance sheet to on balance sheet and moves of assets and liabilities from the shadow banking system to the formal banking system) and the ensuing contraction in credit as the mounting losses will dominate by a large margin any bank recapitalization from SWFs. A contagious and cascading spiral of credit disintermediation, credit contraction, sharp fall in asset prices and sharp widening in credit spreads will then be transmitted to most parts of the financial system. This massive credit crunch will make the economic contraction more severe and lead to further financial losses. Total losses in the financial system will add up to more than $1 trillion and the economic recession will become deeper, more protracted and severe.

A near global economic recession will ensue as the financial and credit losses and the credit crunch spread around the world. Panic, fire sales, cascading fall in asset prices will exacerbate the financial and real economic distress as a number of large and systemically important financial institutions go bankrupt. A 1987 style stock market crash could occur leading to further panic and severe financial and economic distress. Monetary and fiscal easing will not be able to prevent a systemic financial meltdown as credit and insolvency problems trump illiquidity problems. The lack of trust in counterparties – driven by the opacity and lack of transparency in financial markets, and uncertainty about the size of the losses and who is holding the toxic waste securities – will add to the impotence of monetary policy and lead to massive hoarding of liquidity that will exacerbates the liquidity and credit crunch.

In this meltdown scenario US and global financial markets will experience their most severe crisis in the last quarter of a century.
Bottomline: the mean reason is the greed of the bankers: they activily sold loans to people who they knew would never be able to repay, and next they covered these loans up and resold them (credit swaps) worldwide so they wouldn't get stuck with them when the ball would drop.

Maybe you would call that 'personnal responsability'. I'd call it fraud.
If there is any fraud it is from people who applied for loans they knew they could not afford or have any intention of repaying, I would even call it theft.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

lowing wrote:

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

Expect lowing and his ilk to keep going further "off the reservation".

Its a solidified 12-point spread now, and only growing.

The wingnuts will get even more shrill in the coming week or two, blaming the problems of the world on everyone except themselves.  Have a heart though, their world is coming to an end and their world view will need to catch up.  Its a traumatic experience for some people to do it all at once.  Check out the recent audience make-up of McCain's rallies, the hard-core nuts that show up are even scaring him.
Yeah now there is a twist, I blame everyone for my problems except me.

Pal, I pay my bills and I have never not once without exception taken any welfare from any taxpayers.
Did you ever vote for, donate to, provide or accept patronage (as a customer, employee, etc), or support in any meaningful way any representative, employer, leader, or colleague that had a hand in this crisis or that has lead to the implosion of the conservative party in the US?

Every talking point you regurgitate, every chain mail you forward, every vote you cast, every idiot you influence to do the same, and every other action you take as a result of a delusional world view perpetuated by the right-wing propaganda machine makes you complicit.
You are nuts.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Lowing still hasn't quantified or qualified in any manner, at all, whatsoever, why he chose to blast the Wii's reputation.
Aussie, I used the WII as an example of all of the luxery items Americans spend money ( or credit) on in the same breath bitching how they do not have any money and they are going broke due to cost of living and gas etc......

I am sorry that, by now, you still do not get that point.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard