Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

 

2008-10-13 18:49:48
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6956|Long Island, New York
That's exactly it. Your die hard hatred for anything with the word "liberal" in it, anything involving the word and anything even relating to the word nulls everything. Democrats are typically liberal or liberal leaning, so you'll never vote Blue. You'll almost always vote red. Am I right or am I wrong?

One can have different beliefs than their party and still vote blindly along it. I CERTAINLY don't agree with a lot that Obama is saying, but I'm still supporting him. Except I don't vote blindly along the democratic party. I'm a big Mike Bloomberg and Chuck Hagel fan.

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-10-13 18:52:44)

2008-10-13 18:53:15
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7050|949

lowing wrote:

I am pro-choice
I am against the govt. bailout
I am pro-gay marriage
I am not a Christian or religious at all

The reason you think everything I say contradicts this is because it just so happens that everything liberals support goes against individuality and personal achievment and responsibility in favor of collective achievment and responsibility.
You chide people who feed at the government's social programs trough, yet say little to nothing about people at the top siphoning many times more than anyone on welfare.  You lambast government welfare in general, yet worked for (maybe still do) a government contractor.  You talk about freedom, yet every other thread of yours is about the impending Muslim invasion of our culture.

You are like a fat kids colon - full of shit.

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-10-13 18:53:58)

2008-10-13 18:54:03
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6887
This thread sucks and so does this sub-forum.
2008-10-13 18:54:35
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7050|949

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

This thread sucks and so does this sub-forum.
then get out.  All you do is complain about D&ST in D&ST threads - no one forces you to read this.

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-10-13 18:54:50)

2008-10-13 18:56:50
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

Poseidon wrote:

That's exactly it. Your die hard hatred for anything with the word "liberal" in it, anything involving the word and anything even relating to the word nulls everything. Democrats are typically liberal or liberal leaning, so you'll never vote Blue. You'll almost always vote red. Am I right or am I wrong?

One can have different beliefs than their party and still vote blindly along it. I CERTAINLY don't agree with a lot that Obama is saying, but I'm still supporting him. Except I don't vote blindly along the democratic party. I'm a big Mike Bloomberg and Chuck Hagel fan.
I vote what just s ohappens to be closer to supporting my opinion. That, is certainly not Obama. If there were any real chance for a third party victory libertarian would certainly get my vote.
2008-10-13 18:57:23
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6762|tropical regions of london
being a mothafuckin hustla is recession proof
2008-10-13 18:58:37
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6956|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

That's exactly it. Your die hard hatred for anything with the word "liberal" in it, anything involving the word and anything even relating to the word nulls everything. Democrats are typically liberal or liberal leaning, so you'll never vote Blue. You'll almost always vote red. Am I right or am I wrong?

One can have different beliefs than their party and still vote blindly along it. I CERTAINLY don't agree with a lot that Obama is saying, but I'm still supporting him. Except I don't vote blindly along the democratic party. I'm a big Mike Bloomberg and Chuck Hagel fan.
I vote what just s ohappens to be closer to supporting my opinion. That, is certainly not Obama. If there were any real chance for a third party victory libertarian would certainly get my vote.
You're pulling a Sarah Palin here. You're not really even responding to what I said.

Do you, or do you not vote solely red?
2008-10-13 18:59:27
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6762|tropical regions of london
red is for communism
2008-10-13 18:59:50
topal63
. . .
+533|7137

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

This thread sucks and so does this sub-forum.
then get out.  All you do is complain about D&ST in D&ST threads - no one forces you to read this.
What the hell is wrong with wondering what jobs or professions might be recession proof? And then discussing it? Why of all threads to rail against this one... 100x(?) =
2008-10-13 19:05:10
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

lowing wrote:

I am pro-choice
I am against the govt. bailout
I am pro-gay marriage
I am not a Christian or religious at all

The reason you think everything I say contradicts this is because it just so happens that everything liberals support goes against individuality and personal achievment and responsibility in favor of collective achievment and responsibility.
You chide people who feed at the government's social programs trough, yet say little to nothing about people at the top siphoning many times more than anyone on welfare.  You lambast government welfare in general, yet worked for (maybe still do) a government contractor.  You talk about freedom, yet every other thread of yours is about the impending Muslim invasion of our culture.

You are like a fat kids colon - full of shit.
Really, in translation you must mean people at the top earn more than people on welfare. Stealing is stealing, if someone is stealing be they on welfare or Wall Street they should be arrested and punished. I support that. It seems what you are bitching about are those people that just simple earn more than others and this is not "fair" so you gotta hate them

I do not work for a govt. contractor, I work for a company that has many contracts, some are private and some are govt. I just so happened to be put on a project that was for the military. As I am pro military and pro national defense and my project has save several American crewmens lives since implemented I am proud to be a part of it. There is no contridiction from my beliefs and my work.

I do not like Islam because it is not tolerant of the freedoms that members of our society have fought and died for. Their intolerance flies in the face of everything American society believes in. If you want to call it a contradiction because I do not tolerate Islams freedom to come into western society and change it. I am sorry, I can sleep at night comfortable with my opinion of it. It is hypocritical to be intolerant of those that are intolerant.
2008-10-13 19:06:40
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

That's exactly it. Your die hard hatred for anything with the word "liberal" in it, anything involving the word and anything even relating to the word nulls everything. Democrats are typically liberal or liberal leaning, so you'll never vote Blue. You'll almost always vote red. Am I right or am I wrong?

One can have different beliefs than their party and still vote blindly along it. I CERTAINLY don't agree with a lot that Obama is saying, but I'm still supporting him. Except I don't vote blindly along the democratic party. I'm a big Mike Bloomberg and Chuck Hagel fan.
I vote what just s ohappens to be closer to supporting my opinion. That, is certainly not Obama. If there were any real chance for a third party victory libertarian would certainly get my vote.
You're pulling a Sarah Palin here. You're not really even responding to what I said.

Do you, or do you not vote solely red?
I vote the lesser of 2 evils in my opinion, and the lesser of 2 evils is NOT Obama. I guess you could say I vote more against a candidate than I do FOR a candidate.
2008-10-13 19:07:58
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6956|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:


I vote what just s ohappens to be closer to supporting my opinion. That, is certainly not Obama. If there were any real chance for a third party victory libertarian would certainly get my vote.
You're pulling a Sarah Palin here. You're not really even responding to what I said.

Do you, or do you not vote solely red?
I vote the lesser of 2 evils in my opinion, and the lesser of 2 evils is NOT Obama. I guess you could say I vote more against a candidate than I do FOR a candidate.
AND YOU ARE STILL NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION!

I'mma about to Joe Biden rant on your ass.

Do. You. Vote. Red. In. Every. Election.
2008-10-13 19:09:44
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


You're pulling a Sarah Palin here. You're not really even responding to what I said.

Do you, or do you not vote solely red?
I vote the lesser of 2 evils in my opinion, and the lesser of 2 evils is NOT Obama. I guess you could say I vote more against a candidate than I do FOR a candidate.
AND YOU ARE STILL NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION!

I'mma about to Joe Biden rant on your ass.

Do. You. Vote. Red. In. Every. Election.
I vote against democrats
2008-10-13 19:09:56
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6571|what

lowing wrote:

I vote the lesser of 2 evils in my opinion, and the lesser of 2 evils is NOT Obama. I guess you could say I vote more against a candidate than I do FOR a candidate.
You vote against a candidate, rather than for one?

You base your whole vote on the premise of disliking someone.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
2008-10-13 19:10:25
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6956|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:


I vote the lesser of 2 evils in my opinion, and the lesser of 2 evils is NOT Obama. I guess you could say I vote more against a candidate than I do FOR a candidate.
AND YOU ARE STILL NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION!

I'mma about to Joe Biden rant on your ass.

Do. You. Vote. Red. In. Every. Election.
I vote against democrats
There you go. And that is exactly what I was saying, and you've admitted to doing so.

Congrats.
2008-10-13 19:11:59
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

I vote the lesser of 2 evils in my opinion, and the lesser of 2 evils is NOT Obama. I guess you could say I vote more against a candidate than I do FOR a candidate.
You vote against a candidate, rather than for one?

You base your whole vote on the premise of disliking someone.
Like I said, I do not walk the party line, it just so happens Democrats are farther against my beliefs than Republicans
2008-10-13 19:13:04
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7070|USA

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

AND YOU ARE STILL NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION!

I'mma about to Joe Biden rant on your ass.

Do. You. Vote. Red. In. Every. Election.
I vote against democrats
There you go. And that is exactly what I was saying, and you've admitted to doing so.

Congrats.
Wow, are you really really that surprised?
2008-10-13 19:13:45
Miggle
FUCK UBISOFT
+1,411|7160|FUCK UBISOFT

You're never going to have the perfect president, he doesn't want Obama, so he votes against him.

He doesn't necessarily want McCain either, but if getting McCain means not getting Obama, he's all for it.

Last edited by Miggle (2008-10-13 19:14:04)

https://i.imgur.com/86fodNE.png
2008-10-13 19:14:20
LividBovine
The Year of the Cow!
+175|6798|MN

imortal wrote:

LividBovine wrote:

Why would the food industry not be fairly recession proof?
Because resturants will be among the first to suffer.  Families will forgoe eating out in an effort to save money.
Food industry is larger than just the restaurants.  I actually consider restaurants more of the service industry.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
2008-10-13 19:14:32
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6956|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:


I vote against democrats
There you go. And that is exactly what I was saying, and you've admitted to doing so.

Congrats.
Wow, are you really really that surprised?
You denied what I said, tried to argue against it and eventually admitted to doing so.

So no, not really.
2008-10-13 19:15:04
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6762|tropical regions of london
so how bout them recession proof economies.  I would ban the shit out of everyone if I was a mod.
2008-10-13 19:16:12
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7050|949

God Save the Queen wrote:

so how bout them recession proof economies.  I would ban the shit out of everyone if I was a mod.
I guess I work for one - Network Hardware Manufacturer.

Actually if Comcast went under so would my company.
2008-10-13 19:18:36
topal63
. . .
+533|7137

lowing wrote:

Really, in translation you must mean people at the top earn more than people on welfare. Stealing is stealing, if someone is stealing be they on welfare or Wall Street they should be arrested and punished. I support that. It seems what you are bitching about are those people that just simple earn more than others and this is not "fair" so you gotta hate them.
That's not true, that they just earn more because of some free-market assumption existing in the workforce; workplace; market. Their is no way they can earn more unless the laws and governmental monetary policies support the flow of money - to one specific sector first in society as a preference over it flowing to another source. It flows from the Federal Reserve to the Financial sector. That is monetary policy - it isn't a necessary flow of capital (the money supply existing for "we the people" of the Nation and not a specific sector or group). It just is.

It can be done vastly differently. As indicated before in another thread the greatest concentration of wealth has been flowing to the financial sector for the last twenty or more years - at vastly faster rates in the last 8-10 years. The top 0.1% of income earners have a wealth concentration nearly the same as the robber baron days of the early 1900s.

Last edited by topal63 (2008-10-13 19:29:30)

2008-10-13 19:20:24
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6941|...

God Save the Queen wrote:

I sell crack to suburban white kids
speaking of which
2008-10-13 19:21:49
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6762|tropical regions of london

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

God Save the Queen wrote:

so how bout them recession proof economies.  I would ban the shit out of everyone if I was a mod.
I guess I work for one - Network Hardware Manufacturer.

Actually if Comcast went under so would my company.
As long as people get sick, Ill be employed

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard