This map provides a state-by-state overview of the current polling. States for which we (
Princeton Election Consortium) are currently at least 95% confident in the outcome are considered “safe states” and are colored in the darkest color. States for which we are less confident in the outcome are more lightly colored (proportionally) based on the direction in which they are currently leaning (either towards Obama, or towards McCain). States which we currently view as tied are colored in white. Those states which are currently polling for Obama are colored in blue, and those for McCain are colored in red.

* As of October 14, 8:00PM EDT:
* Obama: 354
* McCain: 184
* Meta-margin: Obama +6.18%Our accuracy compared with national poll averages
The question arises: how good is the Meta-Analysis in comparison with a more conventional measure such as an average of multiple national polls? Answer:
Today, the Meta-Analysis is over four times as accurate as an average of recent national polls. Furthermore, it gives an estimate in the units that matter - electoral votes. Here’s why.
Averaging is an excellent way to see past variation in individual data points. A standard measure of how well you know the true average is the standard error of the mean (SEM), which can be thought of as a multiple-poll version of the famous Margin of Error. Today, the SEM of the last 6 polls is 2.3%, a fairly typical value.
But the Meta-Analysis uses dozens of polls at any given moment from states in contention, and over 100 polls in all… Look at today’s Meta-Analysis, which gives an EV estimate of Obama 329, McCain 209, an EV margin of 120 EV. The Popular Meta-Margin is 3.36%, which gives a linear conversion of 120/3.36=36 EV per percentage point. (Remarkably, linearity is not a bad assumption, as seen in past election data.) Our 95% confidence band is 70 EV wide. Typically, such a confidence band is about 4 times the SEM, making our equivalent SEM 18 EV. This converts to about 0.5% - less than one-fourth the SEM of the Pollster.com average.
An important caveat is individual states are polled less frequently than the nation as a whole. Therefore the Meta-Analysis responds more slowly to changes in opinion. But since it is so much more accurate, it’s still likely to be a better way to detect swings. I can’t prove that - not yet, anyway…