What about that comment was mature? I wasn't finishing his post, either. I was replying suggesting an additional reason.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Kmarion, is mature. He may not have appreaciated you finishing his post for him. And... Obama really doesn't have much to say.nukchebi0 wrote:
That was a really mature comment...K, thx? Have you gotten your pom poms out yet? /supastar
Make a real contribution and I will return the favor. That was my point.nukchebi0 wrote:
That was a really mature comment...K, thx? Have you gotten your pom poms out yet? /supastar
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I'll consider maturity levels after his javos drop.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Kmarion, is mature. He may not have appreaciated you finishing his post for him. And... Obama really doesn't have much to say.nukchebi0 wrote:
That was a really mature comment...K, thx? Have you gotten your pom poms out yet? /supastar
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Why do you think that is? He is torn. Stuck in the middle it would seem.san4 wrote:
I think there is a place for attacking the opposing candidate, but it can't work for McCain unless he explains what would be good about a McCain presidency. That's really hard for him at this point because he's been inconsistent and erratic throughout the campaign. No one wants an inconsistent and erratic President. McCain could have presented a better case for himself, but it's too late now.Kmarion wrote:
McCain is looking back (or at least his supporters want him too). Obama is talking about the future. That is why Obama is pulling it. Thats the way it is whether you agree with it or not. The Dow lost another trillion today.. people want to know what is going to happen with their financial security. They care more about that and it's why McCain should focus on the immediate issues.DBBrinson1 wrote:
I doubt I'll even watch it. McCain refuses to drive home serious character flaws in Obama's with respect to his idealogy and integrity. It's fricking sad. I also think America is ready to vote.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
It was a real contribution. You just didn't like what it said.Kmarion wrote:
Make a real contribution and I will return the favor. That was my point.nukchebi0 wrote:
That was a really mature comment...K, thx? Have you gotten your pom poms out yet? /supastar
Seriously, I expected better from a mod.Kmarion wrote:
I'll consider maturity levels after his javos drop.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Kmarion, is mature. He may not have appreaciated you finishing his post for him. And... Obama really doesn't have much to say.nukchebi0 wrote:
That was a really mature comment...
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-10-15 18:04:41)
And why wouldn't I like it?nukchebi0 wrote:
It was a real contribution. You just didn't like what it said.Kmarion wrote:
Make a real contribution and I will return the favor. That was my point.nukchebi0 wrote:
That was a really mature comment...
Respect your elders.nukchebi0 wrote:
Seriously, I expected better from a mod.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
It was against McCain. But if that wasn't the case, you could explain why you thought it wasn't a real contribution.Kmarion wrote:
And why wouldn't I like it?nukchebi0 wrote:
It was a real contribution. You just didn't like what it said.Kmarion wrote:
Make a real contribution and I will return the favor. That was my point.
I could care less about your empty remarks. But if they don't actually contribute to the discussion I will continue to call them out. You didn't give an example of what he would say. Your reply amounted to "oh yea, well Obama will be better".. that is why you sounded like nothing but a cheerleader. Got it?nukchebi0 wrote:
It was against McCain. But if that wasn't the case, you could explain why you thought it wasn't a real contribution.Kmarion wrote:
And why wouldn't I like it?nukchebi0 wrote:
It was a real contribution. You just didn't like what it said.
In case you haven't heard I'm not voting for McCain.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Not really. I don't see how raising a point contributes nothing to a thread. I was just commenting that Obama does have ammo (which he does, and its rather obvious he does), and McCain might not want to engage in such a battle. I was not cheering on Obama at all, unless that was the impression you wanted to get out of the post. But if you need examples, try Gordon Liddy or the OCA.Kmarion wrote:
I could care less about your empty remarks. But if they don't actually contribute to the discussion I will continue to call them out. You didn't give an example of what he would say. Your reply amounted to "oh yea, well Obama will be better".. that is why you sounded like nothing but a cheerleader. Got it?nukchebi0 wrote:
It was against McCain. But if that wasn't the case, you could explain why you thought it wasn't a real contribution.Kmarion wrote:
And why wouldn't I like it?
Your posts hide that well.In case you haven't heard I'm not voting for McCain.
Edit: Since this probably should be on topic a bit, this debate is way better than the other two, so far. Much more attacking and actual debating than previously.
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-10-15 18:27:33)
Better, your on your way.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not really. I don't see how raising a point contributes nothing to a thread. I was just commenting that Obama does have ammo (which he does, and its rather obvious he does), and McCain might not want to engage in such a battle. I was not cheering on Obama at all, unless that was the impression you wanted to get out of the post. But if you need examples, try Gordon Liddy or the OCA.
Aside from having said it out right more than once I have been critical (and defended) both candidates. You either haven't paid attention or your memory is very selective.In case you haven't heard I'm not voting for McCain.
Your posts hide that well.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
How is this for a freeze frame:
<3 my dvr ..lol
<3 my dvr ..lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz
And to be fair he (Kmarion) may not have appreciated me guessing his posting motivation either. Sorry.Kmarion wrote:
I'll consider maturity levels after his javos drop.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Kmarion, is mature. He may not have appreciated you finishing his post for him. And... Obama really doesn't have much to say.nukchebi0 wrote:
That was a really mature comment...
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
here comes the omgobamasaterrorist stance again...
not helping you Mr. McCain...
not helping you Mr. McCain...
Do I really have to laundry list them, or does Gordon Liddy's status as a convicted felon and his blatant disregard of the Constitution suffice?Kmarion wrote:
Better, your on your way.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not really. I don't see how raising a point contributes nothing to a thread. I was just commenting that Obama does have ammo (which he does, and its rather obvious he does), and McCain might not want to engage in such a battle. I was not cheering on Obama at all, unless that was the impression you wanted to get out of the post. But if you need examples, try Gordon Liddy or the OCA.
Maybe I haven't seen the posts that you mentioned any support for Obama. The majority of the posts of yours I've seen are on the contrary. Maybe it is because they are in the pro-Obama threads - I'm not sure - but regardless, that is the perception I have got.Aside from having said it out right more than once I have been critical (and defended) both candidates. You either haven't paid attention or your memory is very selective.Your posts hide that well.
The Palin women comment was damaging enough.here comes the omgobamasaterrorist stance again...
not helping you Mr. McCain...
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-10-15 18:45:37)
I just noticed a distinct similarity between my dog and McCain.
And she's only nine months old. Poor thing..lol.
And she's only nine months old. Poor thing..lol.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
As long as we're making animal comparisons...
Eerie....
Eerie....
Last edited by -CARNIFEX-[LOC] (2008-10-15 18:49:33)
The last debate was .. meh. This one is much better.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Yes. I see your Liddy with a Ayres and raise you a Rev Wright.nukchebi0 wrote:
Do I really have to laundry list them, or does Gordon Liddy's status as a convicted felon and his blatant disregard of the Constitution suffice?
Ha. She probably reminds you a Mom you either a) wish you had or b)have but hate and can't understand why other people LOVE her.Nuk wrote:
The Palin women comment was damaging enough.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Thank Bob Schieffer.Kmarion wrote:
The last debate was .. meh. This one is much better.
Obama mentioned China currency manipulation to influence trade... thank you.. thank you. To hell with "most favored" trade status.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I think Liddy is worse than those two combined, due to the nature of the relationship between McCain and Liddy when compared to Obama's "relationship" with Ayers and Wright. I was under the impression that McCain and Liddy are actually kind of chummy, and Liddy has a history of making some outrageous comments with respect to the U.S. government ("when the ATF comes, aim for the head..."), not to mention his jailtime after Watergate...DBBrinson1 wrote:
Yes. I see your Liddy with a Ayres and raise you a Rev Wright.nukchebi0 wrote:
Do I really have to laundry list them, or does Gordon Liddy's status as a convicted felon and his blatant disregard of the Constitution suffice?Ha. She probably reminds you a Mom you either a) wish you had or b)have but hate and can't understand why other people LOVE her.Nuk wrote:
The Palin women comment was damaging enough.
$2500 tax credit for health insurance? screw that, I'm gettin' a speed boat.
Bob Schieffer>Tom Brokaw>Jim Lehrer>Gwenn Eiffel
Really enjoying this debate.
Obama is doing exactly what he has to, and McCain isn't focusing on the economy as he should.
Obama is doing exactly what he has to, and McCain isn't focusing on the economy as he should.
This is so weird. My name is Joe and I'm a plumber. It's like they're talking to me.