The best?

2008-10-21 23:21:11

#1

Mint Sauce: Frighteningly average; +780|6553|eng

IN THE POLL I HAVE WRITTEN NVIDIA 296 BECAUSE I'M AN IDIOT, I MEANT 260.

Which is better out of the two of these, performance wise, not price wise. Or is there any other card I should look at (not 4870X2 or GTX 280)

9800GTX+ maybe?

/technoob

Last edited by Mint Sauce (2008-10-21 23:22:18)

#rekt

2008-10-21 23:28:28

#2

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6464|Winland

4850.

I sense a quote pyramid around the corner.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-10-21 23:34:26

#3

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6590|New Haven, CT

To clarify, the 4850 is better bang for your buck, not the better card in terms of absolute performance.

2008-10-21 23:39:02

#4

Mint Sauce: Frighteningly average; +780|6553|eng

nukchebi0 wrote:
To clarify, the 4850 is better bang for your buck, not the better card in terms of absolute performance.

Thank you, this is the answer I was after.

If the GTX 260 performs better overall (not including pvp) then i'll go for that.

#rekt

2008-10-21 23:39:08

#5

legionair: back to i-life; +336|6890|EU

Freezer7Pro wrote:
4850.

I sense a quote pyramid around the corner.

2008-10-21 23:51:47

#6

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6590|New Haven, CT

Mint Sauce wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
To clarify, the 4850 is better bang for your buck, not the better card in terms of absolute performance.
Thank you, this is the answer I was after.

If the GTX 260 performs better overall (not including pvp) then i'll go for that.

Okay, sounds good.

Here is the link to the data. You can change the sum for whatever resolution you game at.

Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-10-21 23:54:20)

2008-10-21 23:52:16

#7

lettuce: site lurkerer; +26|6910|cheshire u.k

legionair wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
4850.

I sense a quote pyramid around the corner.

really?

2008-10-21 23:54:24

#8

Mint Sauce: Frighteningly average; +780|6553|eng

nukchebi0 wrote:
Mint Sauce wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
To clarify, the 4850 is better bang for your buck, not the better card in terms of absolute performance.
Thank you, this is the answer I was after.

If the GTX 260 performs better overall (not including pvp) then i'll go for that.
Pvp?

Price v Performance.

Basically, overall, which performs better.

#rekt

2008-10-21 23:59:00

#9

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6419|what

Tri-sli that shit up, yo.

2008-10-22 00:11:10

#10

CrazeD: Member; +368|6939|Maine

TheAussieReaper wrote:
Tri-sli that shit up, yo.

CrossfireX that shit up, yo

2008-10-22 00:28:54

#11

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|6999|St. Andrews / Oslo

4870 costs about the same as a GTX260, and rapes the shit out of it.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png

2008-10-22 00:50:31

#12

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6590|New Haven, CT

Jenspm wrote:
4870 costs about the same as a GTX260, and rapes the shit out of it.

The charts suggest otherwise.

2008-10-22 01:12:29

#13

CrazeD: Member; +368|6939|Maine

nukchebi0 wrote:
Jenspm wrote:
4870 costs about the same as a GTX260, and rapes the shit out of it.
The charts suggest otherwise.

What...

2008-10-22 01:21:28

#14

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6590|New Haven, CT

CrazeD wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Jenspm wrote:
4870 costs about the same as a GTX260, and rapes the shit out of it.
The charts suggest otherwise.
What...

Click the link in my second post. You might have to add an l at the end of the url.

2008-10-22 01:31:55

#15

CrazeD: Member; +368|6939|Maine

lol, toms hardware.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc. … 15&p=2

2008-10-22 02:00:57

#16

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6590|New Haven, CT

The Anandtech review is only for the 1GB version, which is $50-70 more expensive than the GTX 260.

Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-10-22 02:01:15)

2008-10-22 07:36:31

#17

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|6999|St. Andrews / Oslo

nukchebi0 wrote:
Jenspm wrote:
4870 costs about the same as a GTX260, and rapes the shit out of it.
The charts suggest otherwise.

I'm going to assume that that's the Core216 version, which is $40 more than a 4870, with pretty much the same performance.

2008-10-22 09:17:24

#18

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6832|Area 51

Technically speaking the GTX 260 does outperform a HD4850, but the HD4850 is cheaper and therefore is better in terms of price/performance.

2008-10-22 09:18:52

#19

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6464|Winland

RDMC wrote:
Technically speaking the GTX 260 does outperform a HD4850, but the HD4850 is cheaper and therefore is better in terms of price/performance.

The performance difference is not enough to make up for the difference in price.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-10-22 09:20:44

#20

Bell: Frosties > Cornflakes; +362|6816|UK

lettuce wrote:
legionair wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
4850.

I sense a quote pyramid around the corner.
really?

<3

@OP. What rez are you playing at anyway?

2008-10-22 09:25:02

#21

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6832|Area 51

Freezer7Pro wrote:
RDMC wrote:
Technically speaking the GTX 260 does outperform a HD4850, but the HD4850 is cheaper and therefore is better in terms of price/performance.
The performance difference is not enough to make up for the difference in price.

True that.

2008-10-22 09:27:51

#22

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6681|Finland

HD 4870 is as fast as the 216 core GTX260. The older GTX 260 is slower than HD 4870. Why do you compare cards with different price ranges??? Of course HD 4850 is a bit slower than the GTX... it was never ment to compete with a 100$ more expensive card. That's were HD 4870 comes to show...
And... the HD 4870 1GB is faster than 216 core GTX 260.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-10-22 17:49:56

#23

adv3rsary: Member; +28|6982

i own a GTX 260 896MB and i love but i must say i have always liked ATI cards more (specially their software).. the 4850 was just waaaay more expensive when i bought the GTX 260 896MB and i couldnt justify the price difference.. i dont think with either of those cards you can lose though. but go for the ati unless it's more expensive by like $100 or more

2008-10-22 18:45:41

#24

Brasso: member; +1,549|6897

Jenspm wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Jenspm wrote:
4870 costs about the same as a GTX260, and rapes the shit out of it.
The charts suggest otherwise.
I'm going to assume that that's the Core216 version, which is $40 more than a 4870, with pretty much the same performance.

the 4870 1GB beats it at about the same price, just fyi

Last edited by haffeysucks (2008-10-22 18:45:58)

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-10-25 05:15:59

#25

twoblacklines: all grown up now (its boring); +49|6473

if you OC the 216 gtx your looking at 280gtx performance, so buy that. I kinda wish id spent £35 more and gone for the 216, but im only playing bf2 atm and im on 1680x1050 so i doubt the 260 will be any slouch...

nVidia GTX296 896MB	48%	48% - 12
ATi 4850 512MB	52%	52% - 13
Total: 25

BF2S Forums The best?

Poll

nukchebi0 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

legionair wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

RDMC wrote:

lettuce wrote:

legionair wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

RDMC wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

Board footer