G-NOT_(:0)
Banned
+19|6451

Jebus wrote:

Point of this car is?
l2read
JoshP
Banned
+176|6140|Notts, UK

rdx-fx wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Yeah... 1000 mph, thats faster than a bullet....
Not in most cases

9mm (pistol) = 1000-1400 fps = 818mph average
7.62x51 NATO (military rifle) = 2400-2800 fps = 1773 mph average
300 RUM (hunting rifle) = 2800-3400 fps = 2114 mph average

So, faster than a pistol bullet, sometimes..  but much slower than a rifle bullet.

But, the really interesting bit about that 'car' is that it's doing above Mach 1.0 while on the ground.
Just a little bit of turbulence left uncontrolled.. just a little bit of aerodynamic instability not calculated for = BOOM.

Chuck Yeager had a hard enough time with Mach 1.0 (768mph).  This 'car' is supposed to do Mach 1.3 (1000mph)
we can has proper units not that american old fashioned crap plzkthx?
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6991|byah

JoshP wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Yeah... 1000 mph, thats faster than a bullet....
Not in most cases

9mm (pistol) = 1000-1400 fps = 818mph average
7.62x51 NATO (military rifle) = 2400-2800 fps = 1773 mph average
300 RUM (hunting rifle) = 2800-3400 fps = 2114 mph average

So, faster than a pistol bullet, sometimes..  but much slower than a rifle bullet.

But, the really interesting bit about that 'car' is that it's doing above Mach 1.0 while on the ground.
Just a little bit of turbulence left uncontrolled.. just a little bit of aerodynamic instability not calculated for = BOOM.

Chuck Yeager had a hard enough time with Mach 1.0 (768mph).  This 'car' is supposed to do Mach 1.3 (1000mph)
we can has proper units not that american old fashioned crap plzkthx?
what the hell are you talking about
rdx-fx
...
+955|7042

JoshP wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Yeah... 1000 mph, thats faster than a bullet....
Not in most cases

9mm (pistol) = 1000-1400 fps = 818mph average
7.62x51 NATO (military rifle) = 2400-2800 fps = 1773 mph average
300 RUM (hunting rifle) = 2800-3400 fps = 2114 mph average

So, faster than a pistol bullet, sometimes..  but much slower than a rifle bullet.

But, the really interesting bit about that 'car' is that it's doing above Mach 1.0 while on the ground.
Just a little bit of turbulence left uncontrolled.. just a little bit of aerodynamic instability not calculated for = BOOM.

Chuck Yeager had a hard enough time with Mach 1.0 (768mph).  This 'car' is supposed to do Mach 1.3 (1000mph)
we can has proper units not that american old fashioned crap plzkthx?
Sure.  As soon as you manage to state your request in <cough> ENGLISH.  Y'know, being from the UK and all, one would think you spoke it or something.

1 FPS = 0.3048 MPS

And, BTW, we Americans call those old and busted archaic pain-in-the-ass units "English Units".  Not because we got them from England, but...













Edit: All the engineering calculations I've ever done have been in SI/Metric units, then converted over to standard American units as the last step.
really, we don't even like them.  Slugs, Lbm, Lbf, and a non-base-10 system make for headaches.

Last edited by rdx-fx (2008-10-23 17:48:36)

west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6840
https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
jord
Member
+2,382|7129|The North, beyond the wall.
Quit your moaning, only real men can use imperial measurements.
lxcpikiman
imbad @ bf2
+70|7046|Toronto-Canada
hmmm..ok
how many g's?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard