A new system like that means new incompability. Like Vista wasn't enough already.
If it really is a "real" new system, which I somewhat doubt. MS should move on from the NT kernel, it may be nice, but it's still nothing but a pimped piece of 90's tech. We don't want any more "If the Vista drivers won't run, try the XP ones. If they won't run, try the 2000 ones, if they don't work, try the NT4 ones."
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Yes, I actually had an NT4 driver run in Vista a little while ago, for an old parallel SCSI extension card.
I really hope the driver and hardware management will improve over Vista. The driver reset function is still far from good, and the hardware limitations are just retarded.
And Link, it looks bulky because that shot is from something like a 640x480 screen
@bad-man: Vista is the new XP, which is the new 2000, which was the new NT4 (or Win9k/ME, you can say, 2k was the first user-oriented NT OS).
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. -
Rod Elliot, ESP