FFLink13 wrote:
DeathUnlimited wrote:
FFLink13 wrote:
You're an idiot.
In fact he is right, not idiot. Just look at what score the Acer G24 has at
http://www.testfreaks.com/monitors/ . Good price point, but the quality of image really is not among the best.
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/reviews/inde … wid=103521That's the only review for it. Most other monitors on that site have many reviews. This has one.
You have to be an idiot to state a whole company's products are shit because you don't like one, or you've had a bad experience with one of a completely different model. I've seen Freezer do it so many times it's laughable.
I've dealt with many, many Acer monitors.
For instance, when we got a shipment (18) of new monitors for the computer lab,
2 were DOA and one had half a broken panel. 5 of the others had at least one locked or dead pixel. The picture quality of them is absolutely horrible, with contrast ratios of "5000:1", they can't even match my lappy, which is supposedly 600:1.
Acer makes ok monitors if you're just looking for a basic monitor, but, as with all computer hardware, you get what you pay for. And you don't pay a lot for an Acer monitor.
EDIT: And no LCD monitor, especially TN, has 50000:1 contrast. That's just what they
might achieve using dynamic contrast, which is not desirable when doing anything but watching movies.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-11-13 06:57:50)