Who would win in a all out war

2008-11-17 11:59:16

#51

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6604|Vancouver | Canada

phishman420 wrote:
DefCon-17 wrote:
phishman420 wrote:
I don't see how some of you can say that Bond is a pussy in Casino Royale.
Because he was.

He was like a grade 9 student or something.
..except for the Parkour scene. That was pretty bad-ass.
Good argument.

I don't need a good argument.

I think Casino Royale was aimed at the same crowd who thinks 300 is an amazing movie.

2008-11-17 12:08:58

#52

SgtHeihn: Should have ducked; +394|6934|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

No, it was Bond at the beginning. They even say in the movie how he was the youngest 007. He hasn't learned how to be the suave player yet.

300 was a great movie visually and slash fest. Historically, it sucked.

That's why I can't watch too many military movies anymore because I sit their and pick them apart. Sometimes you have to dumb down your mind to appreciate a movie.

2008-11-17 12:09:41

#53

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6901|The Twilight Zone

Heihn sums it all up

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-11-17 12:09:54

#54

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|7203|Scotland

DefCon-17 wrote:
phishman420 wrote:
DefCon-17 wrote:

Because he was.

He was like a grade 9 student or something.
..except for the Parkour scene. That was pretty bad-ass.
Good argument.
I don't need a good argument.

I think Casino Royale was aimed at the same crowd who thinks 300 is an amazing movie.

lol. No, I don't think so.

300 was utter shit. Casino Royale was an acceptable and fun Bond movie. Although I will never watch it again. Twice is quite enough.

2008-11-17 12:15:37

#55

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|7068|London, England

Bond cared too much about that bitch though, that's the only thing, and it went onto fucking 2 movies. Fuck that, get over her Bond, I thought you just were in it for the pussy. That bit pissed me off. Bond falling in love, fuck that.

2008-11-17 12:16:18

#56

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6604|Vancouver | Canada

Zimmer wrote:
DefCon-17 wrote:
phishman420 wrote:

Good argument.
I don't need a good argument.

I think Casino Royale was aimed at the same crowd who thinks 300 is an amazing movie.
lol. No, I don't think so.

300 was utter shit. Casino Royale was an acceptable and fun Bond movie. Although I will never watch it again. Twice is quite enough.

It was an acceptable movie. Not an acceptable Bond movie.
If you approach it without considering it a Bond movie, it's pretty good.

Same goes for...some other movie. I forgot which.

Whenever I don't like a movie based on something, I try to look at is as being something completely different.

2008-11-17 12:22:03

#57

phishman420: Banned; +821|6129

Mekstizzle wrote:
Bond cared too much about that bitch though, that's the only thing, and it went onto fucking 2 movies. Fuck that, get over her Bond, I thought you just were in it for the pussy. That bit pissed me off. Bond falling in love, fuck that.

It was the beginning of Bond. Love failed him, and after that, he only cared about the pussy.

2008-11-17 12:37:48

#58

SgtHeihn: Should have ducked; +394|6934|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

phishman420 wrote:
Mekstizzle wrote:
Bond cared too much about that bitch though, that's the only thing, and it went onto fucking 2 movies. Fuck that, get over her Bond, I thought you just were in it for the pussy. That bit pissed me off. Bond falling in love, fuck that.
It was the beginning of Bond. Love failed him, and after that, he only cared about the pussy.

Its just like the original Bond movie, he falls in love and gets married and the bride is killed right after the wedding, after that Bond gives his heart to no women.

2008-11-17 13:01:46

#59

Jrdeacs: Member; +22|6346

bond

2008-11-17 13:21:56

#60

Hope_is_lost117: Psy squad; +49|6444|Belgium

Bond ... For sure

2008-11-17 13:26:35

#61

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|7186|Toronto | Canada

Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Jack Bauer

But really, Bond

2008-11-17 14:20:45

#62

Mint Sauce: Frighteningly average; +780|6734|eng

Peter Griffin

#rekt

2008-11-17 14:28:22

#63

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6985|Long Island, New York

Bond/Craig. He'd rip out Bourne's skull and spine and use it as a ladle.

I mean...Matt Damon? Come on.

2008-11-17 14:41:24

#64

SgtHeihn: Should have ducked; +394|6934|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

Poseidon wrote:
Bond/Craig. He'd rip out Bourne's skull and spine and use it as a ladle.

I mean...Matt Damon? Come on.

Matt actually did a ok job in the first one. The 2nd and 3rd movies killed it.

Thats the beauty of Jason Bourne, he is a highly trained assassin that looks like your everyday joe.

2008-11-17 14:48:32

#65

DesertFox-: The very model of a modern major general; +796|7132|United States of America

Bourne, definately. He is the more resourceful of the two and seems to be your run-of-the-mill assassin, but he's the best. What does Bond do anymore besides blow stuff up and make quips---Bond is your Hollywood spy.
_{Disclaimer: I like both characters but am actually comparing the two}

2008-11-17 14:55:58

#66

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6901|The Twilight Zone

Bond is real, Bourne is not lol

2008-11-17 14:56:46

#67

CammRobb: Banned; +1,510|6578|Carnoustie MASSIF

Is it wise you two being in the same thread again?

2008-11-17 15:31:52

#68

justice: OctoPoster; +978|7188|OctoLand

Bourne, without a doubt.

I know fucking karate

2008-11-17 15:33:12

#69

{B-T}<babacanosh>: Member; +31|7050

BOURNE
wow its 50-50 right now

2008-11-17 15:35:20

#70

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|7075|UK

Zimmer wrote:
Actually, they are characters from a book.

Yeah, but the thread was "Damon" and "Craig".

Jason would win, imho.

2008-11-17 15:51:12

#71

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6901|The Twilight Zone

liquidat0r wrote:
Zimmer wrote:
Actually, they are characters from a book.
Yeah, but the thread was "Damon" and "Craig".

Jason would win, imho.

But Jason doesn't have any gadgets.

2008-11-17 15:53:31

#72

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|7075|UK

.Sup wrote:
liquidat0r wrote:
Zimmer wrote:
Actually, they are characters from a book.
Yeah, but the thread was "Damon" and "Craig".

Jason would win, imho.
But Jason doesn't have any gadgets.

He doesn't need them.

2008-11-17 15:55:52

#73

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6901|The Twilight Zone

liquidat0r wrote:
.Sup wrote:
liquidat0r wrote:

Yeah, but the thread was "Damon" and "Craig".

Jason would win, imho.
But Jason doesn't have any gadgets.
He doesn't need them.

kung-fu?

2008-11-17 15:59:45

#74

Bell: Frosties > Cornflakes; +362|6997|UK

Bond.

And fuck you if u disagree.

2008-11-17 16:00:01

#75

{B-T}<babacanosh>: Member; +31|7050

.Sup wrote:
liquidat0r wrote:
Zimmer wrote:
Actually, they are characters from a book.
Yeah, but the thread was "Damon" and "Craig".

Jason would win, imho.
But Jason doesn't have any gadgets.

lol that guy is pretty funny

Bourne	53%	53% - 66
Bond	46%	46% - 57
Total: 123

BF2S Forums Who would win in a all out war

Poll

phishman420 wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

.Sup wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

.Sup wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

.Sup wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

Board footer