I think everything happens for a reason. Hence, I don't believe in coincidence. Do you?
Poll
I don't believe in coincidence. Do you?
Yes | 70% | 70% - 81 | ||||
No | 17% | 17% - 20 | ||||
Unsure | 12% | 12% - 14 | ||||
Total: 115 |
I'd like to think everything happens for a reason but really I know that; shit just happens.
Opposite here, I don't believe in fate, everything in the universe is a coincidence
Everything is a coincidence - you just notice the more convenient ones and as such they're at the front of your mind.
Coincidence
Remember Me As A Time Of Day
I believe in a higher conspiracy. I mean the times when I always say "hey, that's a coincidence" is usually when I have gone out and purchased a DVD, then a couple of days later the movie appears on TV. I think they are pumping out subliminal messages everywhere!
It happens so yes.
Coincidence. I don't believe there is a higher power or 'everything happens for a reason'
"There are no big coincidences or small coincidences, just concidences!!!"
Heh, good ol Seinfeld. Anyway, yes, I believe in coincidence. I don't give into that Philosophical mumbo-jumbo. If everything happened for a reason, then whoever is planning all this out has one hell of a sense of humor.
Heh, good ol Seinfeld. Anyway, yes, I believe in coincidence. I don't give into that Philosophical mumbo-jumbo. If everything happened for a reason, then whoever is planning all this out has one hell of a sense of humor.
Of course everything happens for a reason...but not necessarily an "almighty reason". I believe in Newton's third law...everything that happens is because something was done to cause it...
...
Yes I do. No matter how much I'd want to, I don't believe anything made the newspaper see my ad and lemme take their old UPSes 20 minutes before they were leaving for recycling. I just happened to put an ad in the right newspaper.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Take a course in statistics and I guarantee you'll believe in coincidence by the time you're done.
Occam's Razor applies.
Studied a year of mechanics and statistics.Havok wrote:
Take a course in statistics and I guarantee you'll believe in coincidence by the time you're done.
coincidences are for little girls and alcoholics.
I'm unsure. Sometimes i think something, like, i haven't seen someone on msn in days, then they sign in a few seconds, and i think nothing of it.
But, i believe if i keep a habit going, something that happened the day before will happen again. I don't believe that is a coincidence.
But, i believe if i keep a habit going, something that happened the day before will happen again. I don't believe that is a coincidence.
What a coincidence - I was going to start a thread on this.
Or an alternative - things happen, period. What reasoning (or lack of) you apply to an event is really of no consequence.
Or an alternative - things happen, period. What reasoning (or lack of) you apply to an event is really of no consequence.
Everything is a government conspiracy.
This may be a bit complex to understand at first, but bear with me.
Everything we do technically is not out of choice. Nothing we do is random and everything that happens has been pre-generated.
Take this image : If we had a very very smart person back at the Big Bang, who knew all the current laws of science we know now and all the knowledge of particles and quantum physics, he would have, clearly, predicted that Earth was to be created, and thus, eventually predicted that you would ask this question, or kiss some girl at a party. This is correct, as back then, he could have accurately predicted the location and state of every particle in the universe ( just like we can for the future - technically ).
Thus, from this, we can deduce that these facts are fixed and so you are currently sitting at your computer doing something. I am not denying that it is your CHOICE, but the facts are still there, you were going to do it if you believed it to be choice or not. As you cannot randomly do something without it being able to be predicted.
So technically, there is no reason, there is no real choice and there is no coincidence.
Now, you can argue all you want that there is some "randomness" about the universe, but then again, that may be at a quantum level ( quarks ), and although quarks may be random in their movement and speeds, the particles they create can be predicted. Just like a person cannot be predicted in a crowd, but the crowd can.
Everything we do technically is not out of choice. Nothing we do is random and everything that happens has been pre-generated.
Take this image : If we had a very very smart person back at the Big Bang, who knew all the current laws of science we know now and all the knowledge of particles and quantum physics, he would have, clearly, predicted that Earth was to be created, and thus, eventually predicted that you would ask this question, or kiss some girl at a party. This is correct, as back then, he could have accurately predicted the location and state of every particle in the universe ( just like we can for the future - technically ).
Thus, from this, we can deduce that these facts are fixed and so you are currently sitting at your computer doing something. I am not denying that it is your CHOICE, but the facts are still there, you were going to do it if you believed it to be choice or not. As you cannot randomly do something without it being able to be predicted.
So technically, there is no reason, there is no real choice and there is no coincidence.
Now, you can argue all you want that there is some "randomness" about the universe, but then again, that may be at a quantum level ( quarks ), and although quarks may be random in their movement and speeds, the particles they create can be predicted. Just like a person cannot be predicted in a crowd, but the crowd can.
That sounds like you reworded this:Zimmer wrote:
This may be a bit complex to understand at first, but bear with me.
Everything we do technically is not out of choice. Nothing we do is random and everything that happens has been pre-generated.
Take this image : If we had a very very smart person back at the Big Bang, who knew all the current laws of science we know now and all the knowledge of particles and quantum physics, he would have, clearly, predicted that Earth was to be created, and thus, eventually predicted that you would ask this question, or kiss some girl at a party. This is correct, as back then, he could have accurately predicted the location and state of every particle in the universe ( just like we can for the future - technically ).
Thus, from this, we can deduce that these facts are fixed and so you are currently sitting at your computer doing something. I am not denying that it is your CHOICE, but the facts are still there, you were going to do it if you believed it to be choice or not. As you cannot randomly do something without it being able to be predicted.
So technically, there is no reason, there is no real choice and there is no coincidence.
Now, you can argue all you want that there is some "randomness" about the universe, but then again, that may be at a quantum level ( quarks ), and although quarks may be random in their movement and speeds, the particles they create can be predicted. Just like a person cannot be predicted in a crowd, but the crowd can.
Suppose that Fred existed shortly after the Big Bang. He had unlimited intelligence and memory, and knew all the scientific laws governing the universe and all the properties of every particle that then existed. Thus equipped, billions of years ago, he could have worked out that, eventually, planet Earth would come to exist, that you would too, and that right now you would be reading this article.
After all, even back then he could have worked out all the facts about the location and state of every particle that now exists.
And once those facts are fixed, so is the fact that you are now reading this article. No one's denying you chose to read this. But your choice had causes (certain events in your brain, for example), which in turn had causes, and so on right back to the Big Bang. So your reading this was predictable by Fred long before you existed. Once you came along, it was already far too late for you to do anything about it.
Now, of course, Fred didn't really exist, so he didn't really predict your every move. But the point is: he could have. You might object that modern physics tells us that there is a certain amount of fundamental randomness in the universe, and that this would have upset Fred's predictions. But is this reassuring? Notice that, in ordinary life, it is precisely when people act unpredictably that we sometimes question whether they have acted freely and responsibly. So freewill begins to look incompatible both with causal determination and with randomness. None of us, then, ever do anything freely and responsibly."
And you are who? A nitpicker? I explained it in my own words because I wanted it to be related to the actual post.
Nice one on finding the BBC article and showing how my post has the same concepts and explanation as it does.
Nice one on finding the BBC article and showing how my post has the same concepts and explanation as it does.
I made a simple observation - I did not ascribe any characteristics to your post or the one I quoted. Of course, your explanation is - we do not do anything by choice - then you qualify it with a "what if".Zimmer wrote:
And you are who? A nitpicker? I explained it in my own words because I wanted it to be related to the actual post.
Nice one on finding the BBC article and showing how my post has the same concepts and explanation as it does.
What if aliens actually control our brains? Then we do not do anything by choice, and it doesn't take a lengthy psuedo-philosophical diatribe to understand.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-11-21 13:36:06)
There's a difference between providing an insightful analogy and rephrasing someone elses work whilst passing it off as your own, with no reference or credit given to the original author/source
Fate is a ridiculously irrational idea so I guess by deduction that I fall more firmly into the coincidence camp, if you're going to polarize the two choices in such a way. But really I'm not in great support of either mindsets... shit just happens, in wonderful chaotic spontaneity.
Fate is a ridiculously irrational idea so I guess by deduction that I fall more firmly into the coincidence camp, if you're going to polarize the two choices in such a way. But really I'm not in great support of either mindsets... shit just happens, in wonderful chaotic spontaneity.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Wouldn't it be considered fate?