_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7164|Riva, MD
This is all Maryland law

http://www.associatedcontent.com/articl … tml?cat=17

That's one thing, not allowed to defend yourself at all outside your house. (The story was kinda funny though)

Here have another:

http://smokinbarrel.blogspot.com/2006/0 … -nope.html

Self defense in-home

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_self-defense

You can't use deadly force unless you believe the opposer is going to use or is using deadly force.  Even in your OWN GOD DAMN HOUSE

It's a lose-lose situation.

FUCKING RETARDED

Last edited by _j5689_ (2008-11-23 09:11:40)

The_Sniper_NM
Official EVGA Fanboy
+94|6561|SC | USA |
lol if some fucker even hints at trying to break into your house you can gun him down in sc XD
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7164|Riva, MD
Damn, Jersey has it almost even worse:

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/art … 0003.shtml

It only allows people to buy guns that don't exist yet.
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|7012|Area 51
fail laws are fail
millmax
Wanna fly over Oslo? PM me!
+18|6986|Norway
You should move to Norway.  No one is shot.  The cops are un-armed (they only carry pepper-spray).  No self-defence shootouts anywhere.
Luigi
Sniper Whore
+97|6626|Wisconsin

RDMC wrote:

fail laws are fail
SplinterStrike
Roamer
+250|6858|Eskimo land. AKA Canada.

_j5689_ wrote:

Damn, Jersey has it almost even worse:

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/art … 0003.shtml

It only allows people to buy guns that don't exist yet.
It does refer to handguns only

Could still use your rifle
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7164|Riva, MD
There's hope yet it would seem:

http://mlis.state.md.us/2008rs/billfile/hb1060.htm


House Bill 1060

Synopsis:

Providing that a person is not liable for damages for a personal injury or death of an individual who enters the person's dwelling or place of business with the intent to commit specified crimes under specified circumstances; etc.
JoshP
Banned
+176|6136|Notts, UK
silly americans.
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7164|Riva, MD

JoshP wrote:

silly americans.
I was waiting for such a comment from a Brit.

Last edited by _j5689_ (2008-11-23 09:38:24)

JoshP
Banned
+176|6136|Notts, UK
Well, I'll expand my point. Look at the gun crime rates in america, and the rates in the rest of the world...

The correlation is obvious- easier availability of guns leads to a far higher rate of gun crime.

Which is silly.
Bevo
Nah
+718|6968|Austin, Texas
Pretty sure if you step on my property I can shoot you in the face.

Not quite sure though.
JakAttaK
csanva<3
+492|6773|England

MadKatter wrote:

Pretty sure if you step on my property I can shoot you in the face.

Not quite sure though.
Haha! ^^
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7164|Riva, MD

MadKatter wrote:

Pretty sure if you step on my property I can shoot you in the face.

Not quite sure though.
Well yeah, I'd imagine Texas would be pretty liberal about guns.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6841|The Gem Saloon

MadKatter wrote:

Pretty sure if you step on my property I can shoot you in the face.

Not quite sure though.
in texas, you can.



i never understood those laws, but then again, i cant fathom taking a life over my DVD player or couch.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7068|London, England

JoshP wrote:

silly americans.
Actually it's like that here too, if not worse
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6940|Connecticut

JoshP wrote:

Well, I'll expand my point. Look at the gun crime rates in america, and the rates in the rest of the world...

The correlation is obvious- easier availability of guns leads to a far higher rate of gun crime.

Which is silly.
Lets take a step back here. Pussy liberals and their pussy legislature create leniancy on asswipe criminals. The gun doesn't become associated as a crime tool until it is used by a criminal. Typical Euro bullshit, take away from all because of those who fuck it up. Lets try steep punishments for unlawful gun use instead before we punish law abiding citizens who take their right to bear arms with responsibility.
Malloy must go
Bevo
Nah
+718|6968|Austin, Texas

Parker wrote:

MadKatter wrote:

Pretty sure if you step on my property I can shoot you in the face.

Not quite sure though.
in texas, you can.



i never understood those laws, but then again, i cant fathom taking a life over my DVD player or couch.
The assurance that I can is comforting though.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6841|The Gem Saloon

MadKatter wrote:

Parker wrote:

MadKatter wrote:

Pretty sure if you step on my property I can shoot you in the face.

Not quite sure though.
in texas, you can.



i never understood those laws, but then again, i cant fathom taking a life over my DVD player or couch.
The assurance that I can is comforting though.
indeed...taking life over property is very comforting
JoshP
Banned
+176|6136|Notts, UK

deeznutz1245 wrote:

JoshP wrote:

Well, I'll expand my point. Look at the gun crime rates in america, and the rates in the rest of the world...

The correlation is obvious- easier availability of guns leads to a far higher rate of gun crime.

Which is silly.
Lets take a step back here. Pussy liberals and their pussy legislature create leniancy on asswipe criminals. The gun doesn't become associated as a crime tool until it is used by a criminal. Typical Euro bullshit, take away from all because of those who fuck it up. Lets try steep punishments for unlawful gun use instead before we punish law abiding citizens who take their right to bear arms with responsibility.
oh lawds
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6940|Connecticut

JoshP wrote:

deeznutz1245 wrote:

JoshP wrote:

Well, I'll expand my point. Look at the gun crime rates in america, and the rates in the rest of the world...

The correlation is obvious- easier availability of guns leads to a far higher rate of gun crime.

Which is silly.
Lets take a step back here. Pussy liberals and their pussy legislature create leniancy on asswipe criminals. The gun doesn't become associated as a crime tool until it is used by a criminal. Typical Euro bullshit, take away from all because of those who fuck it up. Lets try steep punishments for unlawful gun use instead before we punish law abiding citizens who take their right to bear arms with responsibility.
oh lawds
Im glad you disagree. Stay in England.
Malloy must go
Peter
Super Awesome Member
+494|6849|dm_maidenhead

deeznutz1245 wrote:

JoshP wrote:

Well, I'll expand my point. Look at the gun crime rates in america, and the rates in the rest of the world...

The correlation is obvious- easier availability of guns leads to a far higher rate of gun crime.

Which is silly.
Lets take a step back here. Pussy liberals and their pussy legislature create leniancy on asswipe criminals. The gun doesn't become associated as a crime tool until it is used by a criminal. Typical Euro bullshit, take away from all because of those who fuck it up. Lets try steep punishments for unlawful gun use instead before we punish law abiding citizens who take their right to bear arms with responsibility.
The point is if the USA didn't have a "right to bear arms" in its constitution the matter of life and death for many people wouldn't depend on if the person who took that 'right' was responsible.


Also (couldn't find another video of it. Starts at 10 seconds)

Last edited by Peter (2008-11-23 10:15:53)

Bevo
Nah
+718|6968|Austin, Texas

Parker wrote:

indeed...taking life over property is very comforting
Don't get your panties in a bunch. I don't plan on killing anyone over a DVD player. Knowing that I could though makes sure that if something more serious were to happen, IE someone coming with a gun or appearance of a gun, harm to one's life etc, that I couldn't be out-lawyer-ed.

Let me put it this way. Someone comes into your house with what you think is a weapon, with harmful intent. You're picking up your gun to protect yourself... but if you have any doubts of pulling the trigger, it could endanger your family, self, or loved ones. If you know that you can shoot regardless, you won't have any second thoughts about shooting the bastard in the shoulder, arm, or wherever you deem appropriate for the situation.

That said, do you think that petty theft rates in Texas are lower than in say, Maryland?
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|7079

Peter wrote:

deeznutz1245 wrote:

JoshP wrote:

Well, I'll expand my point. Look at the gun crime rates in america, and the rates in the rest of the world...

The correlation is obvious- easier availability of guns leads to a far higher rate of gun crime.

Which is silly.
Lets take a step back here. Pussy liberals and their pussy legislature create leniancy on asswipe criminals. The gun doesn't become associated as a crime tool until it is used by a criminal. Typical Euro bullshit, take away from all because of those who fuck it up. Lets try steep punishments for unlawful gun use instead before we punish law abiding citizens who take their right to bear arms with responsibility.
The point is if the USA didn't have a "right to bear arms" in its constitution the matter of life and death for many people wouldn't depend on if the person who took that 'right' was responsible.


Also
[youtube]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FUf-v8fluiU[/youtube]


Fix'd 4 u
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6841|The Gem Saloon

MadKatter wrote:

Let me put it this way.
thank you so much for taking the time to explain that to me.



ill be sure to mention that to the people that pay me for concealed carry/self defense lessons

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard