1. Winamp.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Because of a couple of things:Dauntless wrote:
Why no iPods?
1. iTunes. Just no.
2. Sound. Compared a nano to my phone, and there is hardly any difference.
3. Apple. I'm not that gay.
And so on.
2. True
3. Very True
2. True
3. Very True
after learning about AIMP2, Winamp has almost recieved "OH GOD NO" status in my book.Miggle wrote:
1. Winamp.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Because of a couple of things:Dauntless wrote:
Why no iPods?
1. iTunes. Just no.
2. Sound. Compared a nano to my phone, and there is hardly any difference.
3. Apple. I'm not that gay.
And so on.
2. True
3. Very True
By the way, I ordered a D2 the other day. 16GB version and a 16GB SD card with it. Grand total: 249 euros. I must say I got surprised over how cheap they are.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I have Creative players, Apple players but Sonys are the best when it comes to audio quality.
Last edited by .Sup (2008-12-25 03:52:51)
