Islam....lol. Bunch of cowards. Can't fight a conventional battle so you prey on kids intentionally and hide behind civilians. All of yours on a battle field versus all of ours and you fucking maggots will see your virgins once and for all.Beduin wrote:
Take Islam as enemey, and you WILL fail. Gurantee..
You most welcome, anytime m8...lowing wrote:
Newsflash, I didn't take Islam as an enemy. Islam took the west as an enemy, but thanks for proving my point as to where loyalties lie in regards to Muslims all over the world.Beduin wrote:
No.. Fuck youVax wrote:
FUCK SHARIA LAWTake Islam as enemey, and you WILL fail. Gurantee.lowing wrote:
This is going to get worse for everyone until all of you PC, peace at any price apologists realize that Islam is the enemy. Stop with your bullshit, "awwwwww it is just a few". Muslims, in the end, will follow Islam, and Islam is not sympathetic to the west.
You and what you stand for FAILED big time. Just pack your stuff before you get into shit you cant come out of.
ya ....none of them can fight like men.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Islam....lol. Bunch of cowards. Can't fight a conventional battle so you prey on kids intentionally and hide behind civilians. All of yours on a battle field versus all of ours and you fucking maggots will see your virgins once and for all.Beduin wrote:
Take Islam as enemey, and you WILL fail. Gurantee..
no i mean blowing up markets and targeting civies on purpose. then i mean hiding behind women and children. see, you can pull out a few bad apple examples and that is fine. but all muslims do is fight like pussies. /factm3thod wrote:
you mean like shooting people in the back?
And there's something courageous and noble in dropping thousands of pounds of explosives on civilians from several thousand feet in the air?usmarine wrote:
no i mean blowing up markets and targeting civies on purpose. then i mean hiding behind women and children. see, you can pull out a few bad apple examples and that is fine. but all muslims do is fight like pussies. /factm3thod wrote:
you mean like shooting people in the back?
no, its called smart. we dont feel like dieing for allah. go ahead and defend them dude. idk. i have been on the battlefield and see how they fight and how they try and bait you into killing civies. nevermind the sniper shooting at you from his own house with his kids behind him but, you should know since you went to college lulzUzique wrote:
And there's something courageous and noble in dropping thousands of pounds of explosives on civilians from several thousand feet in the air?usmarine wrote:
no i mean blowing up markets and targeting civies on purpose. then i mean hiding behind women and children. see, you can pull out a few bad apple examples and that is fine. but all muslims do is fight like pussies. /factm3thod wrote:
you mean like shooting people in the back?
It's not 'pussy' to call in an precision airstrike against a "pussy" Muslim sniper because he has your boys held down with a superior position?
Shakespeare advice, I'll come to you. Not how to fight and win a battle though. You said it yourself actually: Precision airstrike. We will call in a precision airstrike to eliminate one or two enemies. Now if those enemies are on a rooftop filled with innocent people then they are fucking their own kind. They on the other hand will blow up a cafe or a market place filled with hundreds of innocent bystanders just to acquire one target. Besides, these people have been using this tactic for hundreds of years (using their own to sheild them). It wasn't until a decde ago we could guide missiles via gps. Our special forces used to have to manually position a lasing device to the target. Sneaking onto a rooftop filled with enemy insurgents in the middle of the night is somewhat ballzy.Uzique wrote:
And there's something courageous and noble in dropping thousands of pounds of explosives on civilians from several thousand feet in the air?usmarine wrote:
no i mean blowing up markets and targeting civies on purpose. then i mean hiding behind women and children. see, you can pull out a few bad apple examples and that is fine. but all muslims do is fight like pussies. /factm3thod wrote:
you mean like shooting people in the back?
It's not 'pussy' to call in an precision airstrike against a "pussy" Muslim sniper because he has your boys held down with a superior position?
What's oxymoronic about that?m3th wrote:
Todays oxymoron: Precision Airstrike
Last edited by Uzique (2008-12-30 08:54:55)
Bit broad brush there Deez. Apparently The Taliban, from stone age Afghanistan = 1.3bn muslims now...deeznutz1245 wrote:
Islam....lol. Bunch of cowards. Can't fight a conventional battle so you prey on kids intentionally and hide behind civilians. All of yours on a battle field versus all of ours and you fucking maggots will see your virgins once and for all.Beduin wrote:
Take Islam as enemey, and you WILL fail. Gurantee..
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-12-30 08:59:02)
A decade ago is when I served. Anyways, the whole point of having infantry in this war is to kick in doors and clear houses. To engage in close quarters combat with insurgents and not the civilians. If we wanted to we could sure level an entire city with some air to surface munitions, but we would rather keep the civies out of it. No matter how advanced your weaponry is, and how far you can strike from you will never, ever, ever win a war without well trained infantry. Fact.Uzique wrote:
Haha, both of you retort with personal comments, whilst ironically being condescending because I'm a "college kid". Riiight .
My only point is that hardly anyone fights with proper decorum nowadays, what's with the "pussy" argument? The extremists are low-down dirty motherfuckers and I would never defend them, but you can hardly proclaim yourselves as the knights templar of awesomeness when you're winning the war on mostly technological fronts. Air, naval and ground superiority in every sense fighting against some crazed Mosleems with AK's and improvised explosives. So yes, ok Deez maybe a decade ago you had to put yourself in some hairy position to call in your big guns, but nowadays I don't think a war has ever been easier won on the technology front- such a huge difference.What's oxymoronic about that?m3th wrote:
Todays oxymoron: Precision Airstrike
Today's moron: m3th.
Airstrike are devastating. Whats so fucing precise about a devastating weapon? It's just more retarded terminology like negative patient output and shock and awe.Uzique wrote:
Haha, both of you retort with personal comments, whilst ironically being condescending because I'm a "college kid". Riiight .
My only point is that hardly anyone fights with proper decorum nowadays, what's with the "pussy" argument? The extremists are low-down dirty motherfuckers and I would never defend them, but you can hardly proclaim yourselves as the knights templar of awesomeness when you're winning the war on mostly technological fronts. Air, naval and ground superiority in every sense fighting against some crazed Mosleems with AK's and improvised explosives. So yes, ok Deez maybe a decade ago you had to put yourself in some hairy position to call in your big guns, but nowadays I don't think a war has ever been easier won on the technology front- such a huge difference.What's oxymoronic about that?m3th wrote:
Todays oxymoron: Precision Airstrike
Today's moron: m3th.
bed said islam Cam. so apparenlty its anyone who follows islam. and thats a lot.CameronPoe wrote:
Bit broad brush there Deez. Apparently The Taliban, from stone age Afghanistan = 1.3bn muslims now...deeznutz1245 wrote:
Islam....lol. Bunch of cowards. Can't fight a conventional battle so you prey on kids intentionally and hide behind civilians. All of yours on a battle field versus all of ours and you fucking maggots will see your virgins once and for all.Beduin wrote:
Take Islam as enemey, and you WILL fail. Gurantee..
Yeah I was a little overboard there.CameronPoe wrote:
Bit broad brush there Deez. Apparently The Taliban, from stone age Afghanistan = 1.3bn muslims now...deeznutz1245 wrote:
Islam....lol. Bunch of cowards. Can't fight a conventional battle so you prey on kids intentionally and hide behind civilians. All of yours on a battle field versus all of ours and you fucking maggots will see your virgins once and for all.Beduin wrote:
Take Islam as enemey, and you WILL fail. Gurantee..
Last edited by deeznutz1245 (2008-12-30 09:00:48)
who said nuke? we would just flatten the fucking place, then clear it out. but oh no, we have rules. you see, there is a HUGE difference.Uzique wrote:
I don't follow, sorry. What, like the American fundamentalist-Christian counterparts would simply drop a nuke on Afghanistan/Iraq? You already hold them under an iron fist of superior firepower and military resource, I don't even thinking nuking a few key cities/areas would end the war in a week. If you're not referring to nukes or any other 'quick' solution then sorry, you're a bit vague.
Precision is just an adjective epithet describing the technology and the concept of the ballistic, don't get all semantic-argument on me... boring. I don't really see how "shock and awe" is retarded terminology, it does what it says on the tin. Sure an air-delivered missile is 'devastating' but the point of precision airstrikes is that the devastation is focused and aimed for maximum effectivity. I don't really see how it's oxymoronic. It's hardly saying 'precision carpet bombing'...m3thod wrote:
Airstrike are devastating. Whats so fucing precise about a devastating weapon? It's just more retarded terminology like negative patient output and shock and awe.Uzique wrote:
Haha, both of you retort with personal comments, whilst ironically being condescending because I'm a "college kid". Riiight .
My only point is that hardly anyone fights with proper decorum nowadays, what's with the "pussy" argument? The extremists are low-down dirty motherfuckers and I would never defend them, but you can hardly proclaim yourselves as the knights templar of awesomeness when you're winning the war on mostly technological fronts. Air, naval and ground superiority in every sense fighting against some crazed Mosleems with AK's and improvised explosives. So yes, ok Deez maybe a decade ago you had to put yourself in some hairy position to call in your big guns, but nowadays I don't think a war has ever been easier won on the technology front- such a huge difference.What's oxymoronic about that?m3th wrote:
Todays oxymoron: Precision Airstrike
Today's moron: m3th.
Yeah, love you too.
No one explicitly said "nuke", I said you were being vague... jeesh. You have rules and there's a huge difference? They have religious rules and codes too, as amoral as they may seem to us- I'm sure they have all the spiritual and perverse moral justification they need before they blow themselves into hundreds of tiny pieces for those 100 50-year old virgins in the sky or whatever fetish they look forward to in the afterlife. I really don't know what to think of what you're saying... is it better to pulverize a country in a week or remain there for several years doing prolonged damage to the infrastructure and people? Could be argued either way, they're both messy but necessary I guess.usmarine wrote:
who said nuke? we would just flatten the fucking place, then clear it out. but oh no, we have rules. you see, there is a HUGE difference.
Last edited by Uzique (2008-12-30 09:05:45)
i dunno. i pulled something on the treadmill this morning.m3thod wrote:
i feel your pain marine
