Edit: This version has the NF200 Chip.
Quad Sli GTX295
X-Fi +3 GTX 285 + 9800GT Physx Card = Sex
GTX 295s are up on newegg:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductLi … 0GTX%20295
TBMFH
Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2009-01-08 00:16:09)
Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2009-01-08 00:16:09)
And 1.21 Jiggawatts.haffeysucks wrote:
the tri-SLI setup just cries for air.
and modestyCheez wrote:
And 1.21 Jiggawatts.haffeysucks wrote:
the tri-SLI setup just cries for air.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-01-08 05:14:25)
see above link?GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
So anyone looking for tri-sli on i7 skip all boards with NF200, just get the normal X58. There is review on HardOCP about NF200 + X58 vs X58 and NF200 flopped badly.
o shit... I was blinded by those funky gfx cardshaffeysucks wrote:
see above link?GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
So anyone looking for tri-sli on i7 skip all boards with NF200, just get the normal X58. There is review on HardOCP about NF200 + X58 vs X58 and NF200 flopped badly.
it's a shame really, you'd think that x16+x16+x6 would be better than x16+x8+x8 but whatever.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-01-08 05:34:50)
Not really, because it's PCIe 2.0. So, x8 == x16 PCIe 1.1.haffeysucks wrote:
it's a shame really, you'd think that x16+x16+x6 would be better than x16+x8+x8 but whatever.
I came.
doesn't matter, because more bandwidth SHOULD help regardless of if that bandwidth is being used.CrazeD wrote:
Not really, because it's PCIe 2.0. So, x8 == x16 PCIe 1.1.haffeysucks wrote:
it's a shame really, you'd think that x16+x16+x6 would be better than x16+x8+x8 but whatever.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-01-08 12:08:57)