Swope
Member
+55|6434|Germany
Which one is better?
Morpheus
This shit still going?
+508|6264|The Mitten

wikipedia wrote:

A Network card, Network Adapter, NIC (network interface card) or LAN Adapter is a piece of computer hardware designed to allow computers to communicate over a computer network
Same thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_card
EE (hats
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6718|The Twilight Zone
He prolly means KillerNIC. It has be proven Killer NIC not being beneficial at all
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
JoshP
Banned
+176|5954|Notts, UK
or maybe he means is it better to have a PCI network card, or to use the onboard LAN
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6646|the land of bourbon
if the speeds are the same, it doesn't matter.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
phishman420
Banned
+821|5946

JoshP wrote:

or maybe he means is it better to have a PCI network card, or to use the onboard LAN
This. I have no clue, but I doubt there is that much difference between the 2.
mikkel
Member
+383|6866
As with any other component, it depends on the quality and the features. There are good onboard network chips, and there are good dedicated network cards. Typically, the chips you'll find onboard on most motherboards are really spartan, containing small buffers, simple circuitry, and very few features. Buying a dedicated card when you already have an onboard chip is something you wouldn't normally do unless you needed large buffers, hardware switching between bridged interfaces, CoS/QoS, 802.1q, 802.3ad, multilayer protocol offloading, 802.3u/x with optical PHY, pluggable tranceiver support, niche interfaces or other implementation-specific features.

If all you need is home connectivity, the onboard chip will do fine.
Swope
Member
+55|6434|Germany

JoshP wrote:

or maybe he means is it better to have a PCI network card, or to use the onboard LAN
This
Morpheus
This shit still going?
+508|6264|The Mitten

Swope wrote:

JoshP wrote:

or maybe he means is it better to have a PCI network card, or to use the onboard LAN
This

steelie34 wrote:

if the speeds are the same, it doesn't matter.
EE (hats
JoshP
Banned
+176|5954|Notts, UK

phishman420 wrote:

This. I have no clue, but I doubt there is that much difference between the 2.
this
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6462|Winland

Some of the simpler integrated ones put quite some load on the CPU when running at full speed. I have a cheap, cheap Realtek PCI 100Mb card, and some more expensive Intel ones. FTP transfer at full speed with the Realtek puts about 60% load on the CPU in my server (P3 1GHz), whilst the load with an Intel card is 15-30%.

However, using modern hardware, it doesn't really matter. Most cheap/integrated cards get good speeds, and with CPUs like Core 2 Duos, the load is perhaps 10% at most when transferring at full capacity.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard