User error tbh.JoshP wrote:
Same, system restore never seems to do anything useful for me and errors 90% of the times i use it
Xbone Stormsurgezz
User error tbh.JoshP wrote:
Same, system restore never seems to do anything useful for me and errors 90% of the times i use it
You can't blame that on the user, system restore is just:Kmarion wrote:
User error tbh.JoshP wrote:
Same, system restore never seems to do anything useful for me and errors 90% of the times i use it
Your simplicity makes my point. Errors 90% of the time .JoshP wrote:
You can't blame that on the user, system restore is just:Kmarion wrote:
User error tbh.JoshP wrote:
Same, system restore never seems to do anything useful for me and errors 90% of the times i use it
1) pick restore point in near past
2) click restore
3) wait
4) receive error message
5) repeat steps 1-4 with every other restore point on the PC
Last edited by phishman420 (2009-01-18 13:50:53)
why isn't it good enough?phishman420 wrote:
I tried Opera again.
It doesn't compare to Firefox. Nothing does.
I would rather use Chrome than Opera.
I use acronis. Works fine for meJoshP wrote:
which image software do you use? When i tried restoring my image using acronis last time i broke my OS (which also happens quite often for me ) it wouldn't restore it, it couldn't see my hard drives in it's bootable restoration mangerythingmax wrote:
When I fuck up my OS, which happens surprisingly often, I just use the stored image on my server to reimage my disk. After reinstalling windows 9 times in a single night some years ago, I learned my lesson
ff3 blows ass. It's the Windows Millennium edition of browsers. Maybe they'll fix all their issues in 3.1.. we'll see.phishman420 wrote:
I tried Opera again.
It doesn't compare to Firefox. Nothing does.
I would rather use Chrome than Opera.
yeah i had one where all the results looked like go.google?something=something, but it always redirected back to bogus anti software sites, it was a bitch to removeJoshP wrote:
not reallyWar Man wrote:
No, just you used bf2s which could mean a million things
@ OP it's probably a funky virus by the sounds of it
I don't have any issues besides maybe a crash a week. I use the internet way too fucking much, too.Kmarion wrote:
ff3 blows ass. It's the Windows Millennium edition of browsers. Maybe they'll fix all their issues in 3.1.. we'll see.
What issues do you have with ff3? I haven't had any.Kmarion wrote:
ff3 blows ass. It's the Windows Millennium edition of browsers. Maybe they'll fix all their issues in 3.1.. we'll see.phishman420 wrote:
I tried Opera again.
It doesn't compare to Firefox. Nothing does.
I would rather use Chrome than Opera.
@josh
http://i39.tinypic.com/91j8np.jpg
http://my.opera.com/community/customize … o/?id=8391
Mostly load times are slower. There was also major security issues when they released it.. some holes are still out there. I guess it comes with the territory now that FF is the popular browser.ghettoperson wrote:
What issues do you have with ff3? I haven't had any.Kmarion wrote:
ff3 blows ass. It's the Windows Millennium edition of browsers. Maybe they'll fix all their issues in 3.1.. we'll see.phishman420 wrote:
I tried Opera again.
It doesn't compare to Firefox. Nothing does.
I would rather use Chrome than Opera.
@josh
http://i39.tinypic.com/91j8np.jpg
http://my.opera.com/community/customize … o/?id=8391
The initial load time is slower, but it is fast after that. Also, doing the things in Kyle's thread helps quite a bit.Kmarion wrote:
Mostly load times are slower. There was also major security issues when they released it.. some holes are still out there. I guess it comes with the territory now that FF is the popular browser.ghettoperson wrote:
What issues do you have with ff3? I haven't had any.Kmarion wrote:
ff3 blows ass. It's the Windows Millennium edition of browsers. Maybe they'll fix all their issues in 3.1.. we'll see.
@josh
http://i39.tinypic.com/91j8np.jpg
http://my.opera.com/community/customize … o/?id=8391
What other browsers are you using?
Last edited by phishman420 (2009-01-18 14:32:25)