BF2s 3DMark06 Scores

2008-11-04 07:08:16

#101

CrazeD: Member; +368|6934|Maine

DeathUnlimited wrote:
CrazeD wrote:
DeathUnlimited wrote:

Clock that GPU
Runnin stock cooler, it gets toasty.

I OC'ed it a little bit, but it was running hot so I didn't want to go any higher. Maybe when a get a better cooler...

Anyway, I made it to 9947 @ 649/1010, she was runnin 70*C at idle so I figured I'd stop there...

http://service.futuremark.com/resultAna … ultType=14
4850?

It can do it fine at 90 tbh. BUST THAT 10K GO

Besides you can manually set the fan speed to 100 and then it shouldn't get to 70C even.

Fan speed is 100% 24/7.

My case sucks, tbh.

2008-11-04 09:49:11

#102

Negerkungen: I could not care less; +541|7003|Topside

phishman420 wrote:
Negerkungen wrote:
phishman420 wrote:

He didn't add my score, so GL.
I know I wont get it added
Photoshopping 3DMark scores FTW.

I don't even know how to use photoshop.
If you don't have anything useful to say,just STFU mkay.

2008-11-04 10:04:03

#103

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6458|Winland

Negerkungen wrote:
phishman420 wrote:
Negerkungen wrote:

I know I wont get it added
Photoshopping 3DMark scores FTW.
I don't even know how to use photoshop.
If you don't have anything useful to say,just STFU mkay.

He's just butthurt from the SPI thread drama.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-11-04 10:39:08

#104

phishman420: Banned; +821|5942

Serious business TBH.

2008-11-04 10:40:21

#105

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6724|cuntshitlake

Don't bring SPI thread here. It's not like this would be any serious but there must be some rules that everyone must obey to keep this one organized and clear.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2009-01-13 04:43:35

#106

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6675|Finland

O say hi to EVGA GTX 295 at stock!

score = 22k note that 3dmark detects the CPU frequenzy wrong...

http://service.futuremark.com/resultCom … ultType=14

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2009-01-31 07:59:17

#107

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6458|Winland

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9839070

16736, GTX260 @ 730/1458/1215 and E7400 @ 4GHz

Gotta clock the CPU up a bit more some day. Easily another 1k in that.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-02-02 12:08:11

#108

Naturn: Deeds, not words.; +311|6866|Greenwood, IN

https://www.digital-sickness.net/Uploader/files/1/3DMark/3dmarkv_8800gt.jpg

CPU: AMD 5000 @ 2.8GHz
GPU: 8800GT 512MB
Ram: 4GBs DDR800 4-4-4-12-16-T2
OS: Windows 7

I decided to run a 3DMark Vantage since 3DMark06 will not work on Windows 7 for me.

Last edited by Naturn (2009-02-02 12:11:42)

2009-02-02 12:21:15

#109

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7089

With BFG9800gtoc
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9845477

2009-02-05 01:02:11

#110

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6828|NYC / Hamburg

Yoink!

24579 points

I guess I could do some extra optimization but meh

i7 @ 190x21, 2x GTX295 @ 660/1420/1000

Last edited by max (2009-02-05 01:03:16)

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2009-04-21 17:30:56

#111

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7089

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10719918

2009-04-21 17:43:43

#112

Scorpion0x17: can detect anyone's visible post count...; +691|7027|Cambridge (UK)

I hate you all.

2009-04-21 18:43:29

#113

The_Sniper_NM: Official EVGA Fanboy; +94|6375|SC | USA |

http://service.futuremark.com/resultCom … ultType=14

E8400 @ ~4.05Ghz, x2 8800GTS 512s @ 750/1873/1000

Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2009-04-21 18:46:05)

2009-04-22 03:01:02

#114

Little BaBy JESUS: m8; +394|6410|'straya

CC-Marley wrote:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10719918

Isnt that alittle low? only a few hundred more than my E8400 and HD4870
or is 3dmark very CPU frequency based? or just a crap program lol

Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2009-04-22 03:01:51)

2009-04-22 03:09:08

#115

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6828|NYC / Hamburg

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
CC-Marley wrote:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10719918
Isnt that alittle low? only a few hundred more than my E8400 and HD4870
or is 3dmark very CPU frequency based? or just a crap program lol

ATI hardware performs vastly better than nVidia hardware on 3D06. Even my dual GTX295s hardly outperform a 4870X2. On 3DVantage it's the complete opposite. nV hardware performs much better than ATI. These synthetic benchmarks are a terrible measure of performance

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2009-04-22 03:44:46

#116

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6675|Finland

there is a lot of potential for much higher score.

24887

https://img25.imageshack.us/img25/9569/14996422.png

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2009-04-22 04:32:40

#117

Little BaBy JESUS: m8; +394|6410|'straya

max wrote:
Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
CC-Marley wrote:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10719918
Isnt that alittle low? only a few hundred more than my E8400 and HD4870
or is 3dmark very CPU frequency based? or just a crap program lol
ATI hardware performs vastly better than nVidia hardware on 3D06. Even my dual GTX295s hardly outperform a 4870X2. On 3DVantage it's the complete opposite. nV hardware performs much better than ATI. These synthetic benchmarks are a terrible measure of performance

But we both have intel CPUs and ATi graphics cards. yet the 4870X2 and i7 got only a marginally better score than E8400 and 4870... or am i missing something?

2009-04-22 06:19:38

#118

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6828|NYC / Hamburg

ah shit. I thought you were referring to the post above yours. Nm then

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2009-04-22 18:16:04

#119

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7089

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
max wrote:
Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Isnt that alittle low? only a few hundred more than my E8400 and HD4870
or is 3dmark very CPU frequency based? or just a crap program lol
ATI hardware performs vastly better than nVidia hardware on 3D06. Even my dual GTX295s hardly outperform a 4870X2. On 3DVantage it's the complete opposite. nV hardware performs much better than ATI. These synthetic benchmarks are a terrible measure of performance
But we both have intel CPUs and ATi graphics cards. yet the 4870X2 and i7 got only a marginally better score than E8400 and 4870... or am i missing something?

Don't know. My results are for stock set up. Your e8400 is oc'd, no? doing a Vista reinstall and will post again after I OC the i7 920.

2009-04-22 18:54:37

#120

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6828|NYC / Hamburg

With HT enabled you can get some crazy variations. Disable it for 3Dmark benching

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2009-08-11 11:59:36

#121

Jussimies: Finnish commander whore; +76|6845|Finland

Time for a bumb...

i7 920 @ 4,2GHz, 2x Evga GTX 260 (55nm) SSC @ 695/1496/1195 and 25975 points.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11681781

https://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa281/Jussimies/Benchmarks/th_nimetn.jpg

I gues it is the fastest around here, atleast for now. I could have pushed the processor around 50MHz more to get over 26000 but my goal was to get over 25000 so i didn't bother.

2009-08-11 12:41:09

#122

chuyskywalker: Admin; +2,439|7109|"Frisco"

Wow. I'm not registering to put it up, I don't care about being in the list. But WOW I need to upgrade. 8,754

2009-08-11 12:43:12

#123

chuyskywalker: Admin; +2,439|7109|"Frisco"

Also, if you want to the score WITHOUT registering:

"Save As" at the results screen.
Rename the file to have ".zip" at the end.
Extract file.
Open "Results.xml".
Search for "Score".

You'll find it easy enough.

2009-08-11 13:46:41

#124

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6458|Winland

It should give you the score on their website even if you don't register. It's merely for the linkage and list that you should do it.

Also, hi chuy. Haven't seen you in a good while.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-08-11 13:47:20)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-08-11 15:03:08

#125

Silverberg: Member; +2|6941|England, UK

https://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4008/3dmark4870i7x2.jpg

BF2S Forums BF2s 3DMark06 Scores

DeathUnlimited wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

Negerkungen wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

Negerkungen wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

Negerkungen wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

max wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

max wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Board footer